ImageImageImageImageImage

AI?

Moderators: Rich Rane, NyCeEvO

EFF
Junior
Posts: 391
And1: 0
Joined: Feb 01, 2008

AI? 

Post#1 » by EFF » Mon Feb 11, 2008 9:21 pm

what would everybody say to a Kidd for AI swap? (more or less)
User avatar
jeff1624
RealGM
Posts: 25,127
And1: 1,076
Joined: Jan 19, 2005
Location: NYC
Contact:
   

 

Post#2 » by jeff1624 » Mon Feb 11, 2008 9:36 pm

AI has more value and has been playing out of his mind this season so I doubt Denver does this...
Dat Leadership
User avatar
bigballa3jj
Bench Warmer
Posts: 1,336
And1: 183
Joined: Jun 04, 2007
Location: Louisville, KY

 

Post#3 » by bigballa3jj » Mon Feb 11, 2008 10:25 pm

no way in hell denver does this trade, theyd want kidd next to AI so he can play at SG the whole game
NetsForce
Banned User
Posts: 20,711
And1: 29
Joined: Dec 27, 2006

 

Post#4 » by NetsForce » Mon Feb 11, 2008 10:41 pm

I wouldn't want this deal anyway... I've never been a big fan of AI, the guy is a Grade A Chuckstar.

He's toned things down a bit this season but still he failed in Philly and I just have a feeling he would fail here.
User avatar
Rich Rane
Senior Mod - Nets
Senior Mod - Nets
Posts: 36,950
And1: 15,619
Joined: Jun 29, 2005
       

 

Post#5 » by Rich Rane » Tue Feb 12, 2008 12:08 am

Trading a guy that has asked to be traded for a guy that has done the same. Not to mention I think Iverson's the worst volume scorer in the history of the NBA. No thanks.

On something related to a Kidd trade, I love Jeff Schwartz (Kidd's agent) threatening to tell future clients not to come to NJ. First off, he should've never went public as it just makes things harder with a President like Thorn. Secondly, it's not like we've had the best signings for Free Agents. As much a fan I am of Kidd, I'd rather Thorn send him to Memphis or Minnesota if there's a better deal there than somewhere in LA, Dallas, San Antonio, or any other contender. The article may not be true (It is the Daily News), but I had to get that out there.
User avatar
Da big3
Starter
Posts: 2,405
And1: 2
Joined: Nov 29, 2007
Location: #hellobrooklyn

 

Post#6 » by Da big3 » Tue Feb 12, 2008 1:11 am

na, iverson is troubled, although not recently, id stick with Kidd, Kidd has stamped his leadership in the lockers plus good rebounder, somethin we lack
aussienet
Senior
Posts: 517
And1: 0
Joined: Jan 03, 2007
Location: In the classy posters hall of Fame!

 

Post#7 » by aussienet » Tue Feb 12, 2008 1:40 am

What if he/she meant the other AI?
User avatar
Serpo
Veteran
Posts: 2,964
And1: 0
Joined: Jan 15, 2008

 

Post#8 » by Serpo » Tue Feb 12, 2008 2:03 am

That'll make even less sence , since we already have RJ at SF who doesn't need to get paid at the end of the season .
EFF
Junior
Posts: 391
And1: 0
Joined: Feb 01, 2008

 

Post#9 » by EFF » Tue Feb 12, 2008 7:10 pm

Yeah i meant Iverson. I don't see denver making the move either considering he accounts for 25+ points a game. But Kidd would account for those points i think in other ways because he changes the game and creates plays especially since he'll be reunited with K-Mart. it would be pretty nasty having wings of Melo and JR with Kmart trailing.

For the nets it would give a scorer who can force points up on the board, and that's important because our offense tends to stall out. His passing is decent and he wouldn't be afriad to throw lobs to Sean.

Return to Brooklyn Nets