Did the Warriors really need to sign Chris Webber??

raptor21_85 · Post #1 » by **raptor21_85** » Tue Feb 12, 2008 3:59 am

...because I don't see that much improvement, actually I wonder how could he fit in Nelly's type of game (run and gun)

:roll:

MagicFan3 · Post #2 » by **MagicFan3** » Tue Feb 12, 2008 4:01 am

No, but it was better them get him than the Pistons. He'd actually help them. This way, Webber is off the market, but no one benefits from it.

NapoleonII · Post #3 » by **NapoleonII** » Tue Feb 12, 2008 4:02 am

Did the pistons even want him? Honestly, if you can't play defense you don't belong on that team.

Mik317 · Post #4 » by **Mik317** » Tue Feb 12, 2008 4:03 am

EVERYBODY can use a little C-Webb. I mean those flat 18 foot jumpers..........man those are awesome. Just what they need a old slow bigman who can play defense to save his life, with a crappy jumpshot that he uses regularly.........but hey he can pass.

I hate Chris Webber.

MagicFan3 · Post #5 » by **MagicFan3** » Tue Feb 12, 2008 4:08 am

I love Chris Webber. Back in the day he helped us get Penny Hardaway. :nod:

Post #6 » by **dockingsched** » Tue Feb 12, 2008 4:08 am

they needed someone to start over beans. how else were they going to lower beans' asking price?

SacTown Kings · Post #7 » by **SacTown Kings** » Tue Feb 12, 2008 4:10 am

MagicFan3 wrote:No, but it was better them get him than the Pistons. He'd actually help them. This way, Webber is off the market, but no one benefits from it.

That is how I feel. I was all for the Warriors getting Webber, even as a Kings fan. I felt like there was more of a chance that Webber hurts the Warriors than makes them better. It is still early, I am not going to say I was right just yet.

Webber was a pretty good #1 option in his prime. He is nothing more than a 4th or 5th option now and worse than ever at defense. The main problem is that Chris doesn't know he is a 4th option, he still thinks he is good. Webber never learned how to be a role player.

Texas Longhorns · Post #8 » by **Texas Longhorns** » Tue Feb 12, 2008 4:11 am

Chris Webber would have been better with the Rockets, IMO. He knows Adelman and had the best years of his career with him. Best of all, he knows the offense better than anyone and he is the perfect predicate the Rockets need as a passer for a smooth offense.

MagicFan3 · Post #9 » by **MagicFan3** » Tue Feb 12, 2008 4:12 am

SacTown Kings wrote:-= original quote snipped =-

That is how I feel. I was all for the Warriors getting Webber, even as a Kings fan. I felt like there was more of a chance that Webber hurts the Warriors than makes them better. It is still early, I am not going to say I was right just yet.

Webber was a pretty good #1 option in his prime. He is nothing more than a 4th or 5th option now and worse than ever at defense. The main problem is that Chris doesn't know he is a 4th option, he still thinks he is good. Webber never learned how to be a role player.

He never learned how to be a role player because it kind of happened overnight. One day he was the star on the Kings, and the next day he was on a plane to Philly to play second wheel. And from there it only got worse.

Scrub Sura · Post #10 » by **Scrub Sura** » Tue Feb 12, 2008 4:19 am

NapoleonII wrote:Did the pistons even want him?

Nope

But Dumars kept the door open just in case something drastic happened.

Post #11 » by **King Roosk** » Tue Feb 12, 2008 4:47 am

As a Rockets fan, I'm very happy that GS decided to pick him up.

Sting3r · Post #12 » by **Sting3r** » Tue Feb 12, 2008 5:14 am

If the Warriors had not picked up Webber, then the Lakers would of probably gotten him meaning no Gasol.

So thanks Warriors. :bowdown:

YiYaoYue · Post #13 » by **YiYaoYue** » Tue Feb 12, 2008 7:41 am

to be honest i think a lot of teams didnt want him.. they wanted room to use that for someone who might get bought out like sam cassell and previous damon stoudamire... and i dont blame them.. webber is so out of shape from not playing on top of his age.

CupcakeNoFillin · Post #14 » by **CupcakeNoFillin** » Tue Feb 12, 2008 8:49 am

Sting3r wrote:If the Warriors had not picked up Webber, then the Lakers would of probably gotten him meaning no Gasol.

So thanks Warriors.

Actually that would have meant no DJ MBENGA.

Lakers fans these days. :lol:

CupcakeNoFillin · Post #15 » by **CupcakeNoFillin** » Tue Feb 12, 2008 8:51 am

raptor21_85 wrote:...because I don't see that much improvement, actually I wonder how could he fit in Nelly's type of game (run and gun)

Answer this: Are centers needed to RUN a fastbreak? Have you ever seen a 5-on-1 fastbreak before?

CupcakeNoFillin · Post #16 » by **CupcakeNoFillin** » Tue Feb 12, 2008 8:53 am

NapoleonII wrote:Did the pistons even want him? Honestly, if you can't play defense you don't belong on that team.

Yeahp. That's why the Warriors have the best record in the Western Conference ever since the return of Stephen Jackson. Warriors suck they can't play defense they don't win games.

b-ball forever · Post #17 » by **b-ball forever** » Tue Feb 12, 2008 10:51 am

Of course they don't *need* him, but he def won't hurt em and will give em depth at the froncourt were they used 2 be paper thin depth-wise.

He shudn't be startin over Biedrins tho, that's kinda dumb

leevii · Post #18 » by **leevii** » Tue Feb 12, 2008 12:15 pm

CupcakeNoFillin wrote:-= original quote snipped =-

Yeahp. That's why the Warriors have the best record in the Western Conference ever since the return of Stephen Jackson. Warriors suck they can't play defense they don't win games.

most out of context reply ever?

CupcakeNoFillin · Post #19 » by **CupcakeNoFillin** » Tue Feb 12, 2008 3:14 pm

Low risk, high reward.

What happens if Chris Webber doesn't work out? Nothing, we didn't lose any key players to get him did we?

crzy · Post #20 » by **crzy** » Tue Feb 12, 2008 3:33 pm

Prorated League Minimum :nod:

Who cares if he doesn't pan out. He costs nothing.