Do we have any interest in Zach Randolph?

realfung · Post #21 » by **realfung** » Tue Feb 12, 2008 9:48 pm

I think his salary is too much to risk for...

sec-106 · Post #22 » by **sec-106** » Tue Feb 12, 2008 11:25 pm

tk76 wrote:Right player, wrong man- so no.

Amen.

barkley34 · Post #23 » by **barkley34** » Wed Feb 13, 2008 12:22 am

I would be surprised if the Knicks can trade him.

If the Sixers traded for him I would start an Ed must go website. :lol:

Post #24 » by **dbodner** » Wed Feb 13, 2008 12:35 am

I don't think there's a 20 ppg scorer that's a worse passer. no thanks.

Dedicated_76ers_fan · Post #25 » by **Dedicated_76ers_fan** » Wed Feb 13, 2008 1:00 am

Take what you can get. A low post option is a low post option

UptownPhilly · Post #26 » by **UptownPhilly** » Wed Feb 13, 2008 1:29 am

He would be worth the risk if we received the Knicks 08 first rounder in return, and didn't have to give up any assets.

I didn't mind Randolph a while ago, but now that the Knicks want him gone, something is awfully wrong.

If we gave up say...Green, Evans, Ollie, Carney + 08 First for Randolph, Collins + 08 First Rounder I wouldn't be upset

The Knicks 1st rounder is likely to be a top 3 pick before/after the trade.

We could take Rose or Gordon with this pick.

Miller/Collins
Gordon/Williams
Iguodala/Young
Randolph/Smith
Dalembert/Booth

or

Rose/Miller
Williams/Collins
Iguodala/Young
Randolph/Smith
Dalembert/Booth

GreenWithEnvy · Post #27 » by **GreenWithEnvy** » Wed Feb 13, 2008 3:47 am

we run now so no hes not a good choice.

Post #28 » by **The Guilty Party** » Wed Feb 13, 2008 4:43 am

The more I think about that contract... the more I cringe. I'll be shocked if Thomas can find a taker for Zach. Consider what Portland took in return for Zach. I mean, they were willing to pay Steve Francis $40MIL not to play a single game for them in order to get rid of Zach. Channing Frye is a nice role player but he's not that nice. I can't imagine Zach's trade value is any greater now than it was this summer.