Would you guys trade Bynum for Al Jeff

Post #81 » by **semi-sentient** » Thu Feb 14, 2008 1:57 am

With the way our team is structured, I'd rather have Bynum.

Al is nice though.

Sofa King · Post #82 » by **Sofa King** » Thu Feb 14, 2008 2:05 am

semi-sentient wrote:With the way our team is structured, I'd rather have Bynum.

Al is nice though.

He has impressed me in the Laker game right now.

Post #83 » by **dockingsched** » Thu Feb 14, 2008 2:19 am

he's a complete non factor on the defensive end. i wouldn't want to build around that.

EHL · Post #84 » by **EHL** » Thu Feb 14, 2008 2:26 am

klomp44 wrote:Both sides would say no.

No, Minny would jump on that quicker than white on rice.

Post #85 » by **Klomp** » Thu Feb 14, 2008 2:28 am

EHL wrote:-= original quote snipped =-

No, Minny would jump on that quicker than white on rice.

Umm, no we wouldn't. I'm a Wolves poster, I would know.

KB20 · Post #86 » by **KB20** » Thu Feb 14, 2008 2:35 am

klomp44 wrote:Both sides would say no.

EHL · Post #87 » by **EHL** » Thu Feb 14, 2008 2:41 am

klomp44 wrote:-= original quote snipped =-

Umm, no we wouldn't. I'm a Wolves poster, I would know.

The fact that you are a Twolves poster means nothing to the Twolves front office.

Post #88 » by **Klomp** » Thu Feb 14, 2008 2:48 am

EHL wrote:-= original quote snipped =-

The fact that you are a Twolves poster means nothing to the Twolves front office.

No, but the fact that the TWolves front office chose to trade Garnett for Al, not Andrew, shows that they think more of Al. That means they probably wouldn't trade him for Bynum. If we wanted Bynum, we would've just traded Garnett for him.

Post #89 » by **LLcoleJ** » Thu Feb 14, 2008 2:48 am

" Its okay, I am a limo driver!"

EHL · Post #90 » by **EHL** » Thu Feb 14, 2008 2:53 am

klomp44 wrote:-= original quote snipped =-

No, but the fact that the TWolves front office chose to trade Garnett for Al, not Andrew, shows that they think more of Al. That means they probably wouldn't trade him for Bynum. If we wanted Bynum, we would've just traded Garnett for him.

Andrew Bynum is a completely different player looked at in a completely different light than last season. The Nets wanted him for Kidd last February. This February the Nets wouldn't even bother asking the Lakers for Bynum. A year makes a big difference. This is not hard to understand.

Post #91 » by **LLcoleJ** » Thu Feb 14, 2008 3:01 am

klomp44 wrote:-= original quote snipped =-

No, but the fact that the TWolves front office chose to trade Garnett for Al, not Andrew, shows that they think more of Al. That means they probably wouldn't trade him for Bynum. If we wanted Bynum, we would've just traded Garnett for him.

Bynum broke out this season.

Post #92 » by **Klomp** » Thu Feb 14, 2008 3:12 am

And McHale has said Al is better than the FO thought he was when they made the trade.

Gerald3Wallace · Post #93 » by **Gerald3Wallace** » Thu Feb 14, 2008 3:13 am

klomp44 wrote:-= original quote snipped =-

No, but the fact that the TWolves front office chose to trade Garnett for Al, not Andrew, shows that they think more of Al. That means they probably wouldn't trade him for Bynum. If we wanted Bynum, we would've just traded Garnett for him.

actually the wolves wanted bynum...they contacted lakers first for bynum just to let u know...but the lakers declined...that should tell u something

Post #94 » by **LLcoleJ** » Thu Feb 14, 2008 3:23 am

klomp44 wrote:And McHale has said Al is better than the FO thought he was when they made the trade.

oh well if Mchale says so....

I would be even more worried for the wolves and you if you thik what Mchale says/does is correct...because the fact of the matter is any other GM in the league would pick Bynum of Jefferson in a minute.

TommyTheCat · Post #95 » by **TommyTheCat** » Thu Feb 14, 2008 3:46 am

Phil_2.0 wrote:-= original quote snipped =-

oh well if Mchale says so....

I would be even more worried for the wolves and you if you thik what Mchale says/does is correct...because the fact of the matter is any other GM in the league would pick Bynum of Jefferson in a minute.

and wasn't mchale the guy that had kg from the get go through his prime and couldn't get a ring? pretty scary example of incompetence from a gm.

EHL · Post #96 » by **EHL** » Thu Feb 14, 2008 3:52 am

klomp44 wrote:And McHale has said Al is better than the FO thought he was when they made the trade.

Boy, the point just keeps flying over your head.

exkonvict · Post #97 » by **exkonvict** » Thu Feb 14, 2008 4:04 am

Hell no. Al is good but he's more of a PF. Pau handled him tonight &

Bynum >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Pau.

Jajwanda · Post #98 » by **Jajwanda** » Thu Feb 14, 2008 4:24 am

Every damn possession the ball was forced to Jefferson. You do that with Bynum he'll put up some gaudy numbers at a much higher FG% with more blocked shots and FAR better defense. Jefferson is a very good player, but it's definitely in Bynum's favor. One's a true center, one just isn't...

That Nicka · Post #99 » by **That Nicka** » Thu Feb 14, 2008 5:05 am

Why would you trade a Center with All Star potential for a PF with All Star potential?

Sofa King · Post #100 » by **Sofa King** » Thu Feb 14, 2008 5:34 am

exkonvict wrote:Hell no. Al is good but he's more of a PF. Pau handled him tonight &

Bynum >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Pau.

Even if Bynum comes back, Pau is still the 2nd option if you ask me. :nod: