ImageImageImage

New Blockbuster Kidd Trade Idea

Moderators: Dirk, HMFFL, Mavrelous

bobsquad
Rookie
Posts: 1,222
And1: 224
Joined: Jun 24, 2006
   

New Blockbuster Kidd Trade Idea 

Post#1 » by bobsquad » Fri Feb 15, 2008 1:39 am

Dallas, New Jersey, and Memphis
This trade was approved by the trade checker. I know its way too much but its still better than that stuff yesterday.

Dallas:
Outgoing - Terry, Stackhouse, Diop, Jones, Ager, Bass, Howard, Van Horn (sign and trade), 2008 1st rounder, 2010 1st rounder, 2009 2nd rounder, cash
Incoming - Kidd (NJ), Wright (NJ), draft rights to M. Gasol (MEM)

New Jersey:
Outgoing - Kidd, Magloire, Nachbar, Wright, S. Williams
Incoming - Terry (DAL), Stackhouse (DAL), Diop (DAL), Jones (DAL), Ager (DAL), Ju. Howard (DAL), Miller (MEM), Lowry (MEM), 2008 1st rounder (DAL), 2010 1st rounder (DAL), 2009 2nd rounder (DAL), cash

Memphis:
Outgoing - Miller, Lowry, draft rights to M. Gasol
Incoming - Bass (DAL), Magloire (NJ), Nachbar (NJ), S. Williams (NJ)

Then we get Stackhouse off waivers 30 days later and fill the roster with free agents. I'M BEING SERIOUS DON'T LOCK THIS THREAD.
User avatar
cmavswin
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 11,213
And1: 222
Joined: Jul 04, 2004
Contact:
       

 

Post#2 » by cmavswin » Fri Feb 15, 2008 1:48 am

IBTL! This is just the dumbest trade I have seen yet. NJ does not want Terry's or Jones' contracts.

Sources say New Jersey would balk at any attempt by Dallas to substitute George with anyone other than Van Horn. The Nets have no interest in replacing him with veteran swingman Eddie Jones and rookie Nick Fazekas or Jones and veteran forward Juwan Howard because the contracts belonging to Jones and Fazekas don't expire at season's end like George's, slicing into the long-term payroll savings New Jersey seeks as part of its post-Kidd rebuilding package.

http://sports.espn.go.com/nba/news/story?id=3246325
MavsFan40
Junior
Posts: 476
And1: 0
Joined: Oct 03, 2003

 

Post#3 » by MavsFan40 » Fri Feb 15, 2008 1:50 am

IBTL :rofl2: Are F'ING serious? :rofl:
studcrackers
Forum Mod
Forum Mod
Posts: 52,226
And1: 6,100
Joined: Oct 31, 2004
Location: Getting hit in the head
         

 

Post#4 » by studcrackers » Fri Feb 15, 2008 1:51 am

memphis kills in that deal, NJ definitely isnt giving up williams and we arent giving up bass for the same damn deal thats already on the table (we actually get less)
Jugs wrote: I saw two buttholes
User avatar
catalyst
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 13,237
And1: 41
Joined: Feb 20, 2003
Location: here

 

Post#5 » by catalyst » Fri Feb 15, 2008 1:53 am

This charming trade leaves mavs with this lineup

Kidd/Barea
Hassell/Wright
Howard/George
Dirk
Damp/Faz

Try again, and attempt to leave the mavs with some players. Give us some reasons why mavs trade 7 for 2? Why does NJ want all of those long contracts to rebuild? I will not lock for now.
User avatar
JES12
RealGM
Posts: 24,863
And1: 128
Joined: Jul 05, 2006

 

Post#6 » by JES12 » Fri Feb 15, 2008 2:00 am

I was about to go off on this trade till I found out it was Juwan, not Josh.

We keep our big 3 and add Kidd. I'm all for it!
bobsquad
Rookie
Posts: 1,222
And1: 224
Joined: Jun 24, 2006
   

 

Post#7 » by bobsquad » Fri Feb 15, 2008 2:06 am

catalyst wrote:This charming trade leaves mavs with this lineup

Kidd/Barea
Hassell/Wright
Howard/George
Dirk
Damp/Faz

Try again, and attempt to leave the mavs with some players. Give us some reasons why mavs trade 7 for 2? Why does NJ want all of those long contracts to rebuild? I will not lock for now.


You forgot Devin Harris, I kept him. Say we keep Jones. Would that kill the trade?
User avatar
JES12
RealGM
Posts: 24,863
And1: 128
Joined: Jul 05, 2006

 

Post#8 » by JES12 » Fri Feb 15, 2008 2:25 am

My main problems with the rumored trade is 1) NJ gets 10 yrs younger at PG, 2) They save about 4 mil this year (not counting the Wright deal with the AJ trade exception) 3) Diop is nothing but a "filler" to them, 4) We add cash to the deal, 5) Cuban is throwing around the draft pickas as iff that is automatic.

Now, if we were to upgrade our team by allowing salary relief, I can see the cash and the picks. But a lateral-at-best move (talent wise) should not require picks and cash...that means Harris for Kidd; no Diop or picks.

Go going back to your initial trade ideal,

If we did a deal like this, it would be much better:

Terry to Miami

Stack to Indiana

Kidd to Dallas

Bass (only talent portion), J. Williams (expiring), Daniels (1 more yr) two 1sts, rights to any of our euro players, cash to New Jersey

That saves them money, gets a good young, cash and picks that is much more palatable.

http://games.espn.go.com/nba/features/t ... &te=&cash=
dirkforpres
RealGM
Posts: 12,020
And1: 7,967
Joined: Sep 13, 2005
   

 

Post#9 » by dirkforpres » Fri Feb 15, 2008 6:12 am

So basically we give up some more players and get Marc Gasol, who has yet to play in the NBA? No.

Return to Dallas Mavericks