Nice to have a win!!
Gold: EO50
Worked hard, protected the rim and came up big when we needed him to. Great from the ft line.
Silver: Felts
Played in control for much of the game and made pretty good decisions for most of it.
Bronze: Dude
Vintage (although we are only 4 years old!!!) Bobcats hustle from the kid. Did it at both ends, played scrappy D and smart O.
Hammers: bobcats Vs hawks
Moderators: BigSlam, yosemiteben, fatlever, JDR720, Diop
Hammers: bobcats Vs hawks
-
BigSlam
- Forum Mod - Hornets
- Posts: 51,164
- And1: 8,360
- Joined: Jul 01, 2005
Hammers: bobcats Vs hawks
B B M F 'ers
-
SteveMorrison15
- Bench Warmer
- Posts: 1,430
- And1: 60
- Joined: Dec 27, 2006
- Location: Orlando
i only caught the final 9 minutes of the 4th. so will my votes count?
1- Raymond
2- Richardson
3- Okafor
1- Raymond
2- Richardson
3- Okafor
Issues 1-5 https://www.facebook.com/SwirlyPro/
-
spectre_
- Lead Assistant
- Posts: 5,366
- And1: 15
- Joined: Feb 14, 2006
- Location: Hornets Nation
I think it could go either way for Gold, but...
Gold - Felton. He pretty much set the tone for most of the game by his penetration. If the others had made their shots (and some of them were EASY shots) he'd have had over 12 assistst.
Silver - Mek! Stellar at the FT line, strong on the boards and did all he could with being our lone defender in the paint.
Bronze - JSwish. Obviously he was playing hurt, but he was very solid at critical points. Shame that 3 pt game clincher didn't go in.
Gold - Felton. He pretty much set the tone for most of the game by his penetration. If the others had made their shots (and some of them were EASY shots) he'd have had over 12 assistst.
Silver - Mek! Stellar at the FT line, strong on the boards and did all he could with being our lone defender in the paint.
Bronze - JSwish. Obviously he was playing hurt, but he was very solid at critical points. Shame that 3 pt game clincher didn't go in.
RaptorJ wrote:they (Bobcats' fans) seem to be some of the least intelligent posters on RealGM from some of the trash they say.
Irony
-
W_HAMILTON
- RealGM
- Posts: 17,453
- And1: 16,996
- Joined: Jun 13, 2004
-
If this things gets a little too Hillary/Obama, I might have to break out my super delegate status and settle this.
22 points (on 23 shots) and 7 assists doesn't compare to 20 pts / 21 rbs / 5 blocks, especially considering Felton made at least one, possibly two, mistakes in the closing moments of the 4th.
22 points (on 23 shots) and 7 assists doesn't compare to 20 pts / 21 rbs / 5 blocks, especially considering Felton made at least one, possibly two, mistakes in the closing moments of the 4th.
Howard Mass wrote:You do not have the right to not be offended. Just because something is offensive to you does not mean that it breaks the board rules.
-
W_HAMILTON
- RealGM
- Posts: 17,453
- And1: 16,996
- Joined: Jun 13, 2004
-
No.
Unlike some of you that either want him to play 40mpg as our starting PG OR be traded so he can be "great" elsewhere, I want what's best for the team.
What's best for the team is him on it. Just not in the position you all want him to be at. Even though, I want to get a good draft pick this year, so I have advocated starting him back at PG, because I think that's a good way to get that good draft pick.
After all, when McInnis starts at PG, Jeff just wins baby!
Unlike some of you that either want him to play 40mpg as our starting PG OR be traded so he can be "great" elsewhere, I want what's best for the team.
What's best for the team is him on it. Just not in the position you all want him to be at. Even though, I want to get a good draft pick this year, so I have advocated starting him back at PG, because I think that's a good way to get that good draft pick.
After all, when McInnis starts at PG, Jeff just wins baby!
Howard Mass wrote:You do not have the right to not be offended. Just because something is offensive to you does not mean that it breaks the board rules.
-
spectre_
- Lead Assistant
- Posts: 5,366
- And1: 15
- Joined: Feb 14, 2006
- Location: Hornets Nation
W_HAMILTON wrote:What's best for the team is him on it.
Maybe, maybe not. Next year woudn't be so bad, but I have to think Felton is going to command "Jameer Nelson" type money. If he does we'd be in hock for 4 backup wing guys (Felts/Hammer/Ammo/Duds) at around 18-20 million bucks. None of those are great defensively and all are streaky...and on top of that Felton is short. I think I'd rather go after a "real" combo guard like Stuckey who's taller and has a better chance against other 2s.
I think he'd be worth more as a trade asset vs. a bench player if nothing else than to balance the roster and get rid of weaknesses...but I'm looking 2 seasons ahead; all sorts of things could change by then.
RaptorJ wrote:they (Bobcats' fans) seem to be some of the least intelligent posters on RealGM from some of the trash they say.
Irony
-
W_HAMILTON
- RealGM
- Posts: 17,453
- And1: 16,996
- Joined: Jun 13, 2004
-
I didn't, but if it's easier for you to rationalize it that way, go right ahead.
You are like the godfather of the Feltons debates, since you were the one that started it all when you said it "seemed" like Felton ran the team better than Knight way back during a Dallas game his first season, when in fact he didn't, and he had a worse +/- than Knight did that game.
And so began years worth of lies, exaggerations, and trashing of our other players, all in an attempt to make Felton seem less disappointing
You should feel honored, all the Bobcats msg boards would have about half the current post total if not for you getting the ball rolling!
You are like the godfather of the Feltons debates, since you were the one that started it all when you said it "seemed" like Felton ran the team better than Knight way back during a Dallas game his first season, when in fact he didn't, and he had a worse +/- than Knight did that game.
And so began years worth of lies, exaggerations, and trashing of our other players, all in an attempt to make Felton seem less disappointing
You should feel honored, all the Bobcats msg boards would have about half the current post total if not for you getting the ball rolling!Howard Mass wrote:You do not have the right to not be offended. Just because something is offensive to you does not mean that it breaks the board rules.
-
Walt Cronkite
- Retired Mod
- Posts: 13,883
- And1: 1,114
- Joined: Jul 02, 2006
- Location: Raleigh
-
