Wiretap: Nuggets Interested In Randolph

d-train · Post #21 » by **d-train** » Fri Feb 15, 2008 10:44 pm

mojomarc wrote:I just did a lookup on the web and I think Zach would be very happy in Denver--they have a strip club with a free lunch buffet from 11-3 every day.

Wow, what do the girls look like if they have to give away free food? I wouldn't go there.

Wizenheimer · Post #22 » by **Wizenheimer** » Fri Feb 15, 2008 11:17 pm

Mr Odd wrote:-= original quote snipped =-

Yes, I am serious.

Iverson, Melo & Zach.

Yes theres only one ball but if they know
they can make the playoffs theyre going
to share. Nuggets will now have three guys
who can go off & score 35+ plus you toss
Zach in with Camby, you got two guys who
can grab a lot of rebounds.. .

LOL...that's exactly the kind of logic that Isiah Thomas used this summer and had all the Knicks fans chorteling about how Isiah had snookered kevin pritchard....

and 50 games later, most knick fans hate Zach and the knicks are doing everything they can to ship zach out...the same sentiment KP and nate had after close aquaintance with zach and his game.

3rd time's the charm I guess...the blazers were worse when zach was here and better after he left. The Knicks were better before zach arrived and absolutely suck with him. But that will all turn around because Iverson and Anthony are so selfless that when they give the ball to zach and he never gives it back, they won't care...HA!

Wizenheimer · Post #23 » by **Wizenheimer** » Fri Feb 15, 2008 11:19 pm

d-train wrote:-= original quote snipped =-

Wow, what do the girls look like if they have to give away free food? I wouldn't go there.

the 'free food' might be a little suspect as well

b_roy7 · Post #24 » by **b_roy7** » Sat Feb 16, 2008 12:30 am

Lol, and I laughed at the fact of Zach and Curry having trouble sharing the ball.

Goldbum · Post #25 » by **Goldbum** » Sat Feb 16, 2008 2:00 am

I know it's not a popular opinion, but I think Zach would be a great 6th man. I look at a guy like Trout whos just as much a chucker as Z-BO and we love him as a designated scorer off the bench. Zach's a much better rebounder and scorer, while Travis is a better defender (unless he's horribly out sized). I see this as a great deal for NY though as Curry-Lee-Kleiza-Smith-Crawford lineup could probably be a playoff team in the Leastern conference next year.

Post #26 » by **BlackMamba** » Sat Feb 16, 2008 2:50 am

i don't think zach will be a good fit for the nuggets. he wants to be #1 or 2 and he would be #3 but far far away from melo and ai.

the nuggets would destroy their depth.

and it's funny, "zach plus another knick", it sounds like "throw whoever we have".

d-train · Post #27 » by **d-train** » Sat Feb 16, 2008 3:14 am

Wizenheimer wrote:the 'free food' might be a little suspect as well

Who would eat food at a strip club? Something about that doesn't feel right. There are some things that don't go together and I can't imagine eating and enjoying naked women at the same time. That is just wrong. In the old days when I went to strip clubs, there was no food. What is the world coming to?

Post #28 » by **mojomarc** » Sat Feb 16, 2008 3:19 am

d-train wrote:-= original quote snipped =-

Who would eat food at a strip club? Something about that doesn't feel right. There are some things that don't go together and I can't imagine eating and enjoying naked women at the same time. That is just wrong. In the old days when I went to strip clubs, there was no food. What is the world coming to?

What are you talking about? The Acropolis was serving $2 t-bones back as long as I can remember.

d-train · Post #29 » by **d-train** » Sat Feb 16, 2008 3:29 am

I went to the Acropolis several times in the late 80's and early 90's. I never saw anyone eating. I know they served food because they had a kitchen and sometimes I could smell food but I never saw anyone eating. Maybe they had private eating booths where disgusting perverts could eat food in a strip bar. It wasn't something you saw people doing out in the open.

Wizenheimer · Post #30 » by **Wizenheimer** » Sat Feb 16, 2008 6:01 am

d-train wrote:I went to the Acropolis several times in the late 80's and early 90's. I never saw anyone eating. I know they served food because they had a kitchen and sometimes I could smell food but I never saw anyone eating. Maybe they had private eating booths where disgusting perverts could eat food in a strip bar. It wasn't something you saw people doing out in the open.

LOL...I'm thinking there should be a SNL or Mad TV skit on that

Post #31 » by **Mr Odd** » Sat Feb 16, 2008 6:09 am

Wizenheimer wrote:-= original quote snipped =-

LOL...that's exactly the kind of logic that Isiah Thomas used this summer and had all the Knicks fans chorteling about how Isiah had snookered kevin pritchard....

and 50 games later, most knick fans hate Zach and the knicks are doing everything they can to ship zach out...the same sentiment KP and nate had after close aquaintance with zach and his game.

3rd time's the charm I guess...the blazers were worse when zach was here and better after he left. The Knicks were better before zach arrived and absolutely suck with him. But that will all turn around because Iverson and Anthony are so selfless that when they give the ball to zach and he never gives it back, they won't care...HA!

Oh, im not saying they would win a title with those three
but they would have a better chance with those three then
just with the two. Also I would not want any of them on my
team. As for the Knicks, theyre not like the Nuggets. Atleast
I cant see it. Its true tho that Zach is a hog, but with Melo and
Iverson I think even Zach would give up the ball if it ment that
they could do damage in the playoffs. But I know talent alone
doesnt win titles. If that were the case I think the Blazers would
of won one when Trader Bob was the GM & we had a ton of talent.

Post #32 » by **mojomarc** » Sat Feb 16, 2008 6:20 am

Wizenheimer wrote:-= original quote snipped =-

LOL...I'm thinking there should be a SNL or Mad TV skit on that

It would clearly be the Blazers' board version of "more cowbell!"

Wizenheimer · Post #33 » by **Wizenheimer** » Sat Feb 16, 2008 6:29 am

Mr Odd wrote:Oh, im not saying they would win a title with those three
but they would have a better chance with those three then
just with the two. Also I would not want any of them on my
team. As for the Knicks, theyre not like the Nuggets. Atleast
I cant see it. Its true tho that Zach is a hog, but with Melo and
Iverson I think even Zach would give up the ball if it ment that
they could do damage in the playoffs. But I know talent alone
doesnt win titles. If that were the case I think the Blazers would
of won one when Trader Bob was the GM & we had a ton of talent

that may all be true. I think we just have an honest disagreement on what virtues zach actually brings to a team.

My point was twofold however: besides zach's 'impact' on denver, there was the reported 'fact' that both Kleiza and Najera were being traded. And every time I see the nuggets, those two players are integral to Denver winning, and they bring hustle and energy into the game. I believe Denver would miss them enormously, and that zach would not be able to compensate for their loss. Especially if AI and Melo remained the focus of the offense...and they would.

Post #34 » by **Mr Odd** » Sat Feb 16, 2008 6:29 am

I got a fever.. .and the only prescription.. .is more cowbell!!

d-train · Post #35 » by **d-train** » Sat Feb 16, 2008 8:37 am

I'd be doing myself a disservice here if I didn't step forward and demand some credit. If anyone here is going to get gold plated diapers, I get mine first.