ImageImageImageImage

The Superman Dunk was not a dunk.

Moderators: UCFJayBird, UCF, Knightro, Def Swami, Howard Mass, ChosenSavior

TheMadMagician
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,991
And1: 0
Joined: Jun 12, 2006
Location: Poinciana, FL
 

 

Post#21 » by TheMadMagician » Sun Feb 17, 2008 3:43 pm

Superman wrote:I AM Superman, and I say it was a dunk!


LOL
TheMadMagician
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,991
And1: 0
Joined: Jun 12, 2006
Location: Poinciana, FL
 

 

Post#22 » by TheMadMagician » Sun Feb 17, 2008 3:46 pm

jamlando wrote:Considering the fact that they had officials replaying the dunks & even the TNT guys slowed it down & watched and no one said it wasn't a dunk. I think I'd go with the opinions of the guys who actually can play ball & those who can dunk rather than a homer watching it on TV.

GO DWIGHT!


HE DIDNT GRAB THE F****** RIM! that's a lay up. Kenny Smith said he threw it through. Any high jumper can do that crap.
User avatar
leventuysal
Rookie
Posts: 1,128
And1: 64
Joined: Oct 17, 2003
Location: istanbul

 

Post#23 » by leventuysal » Sun Feb 17, 2008 3:52 pm

OK. FYI, you stupid ****, grabbing the rim is for the player's (and other players') protection only. It ensures a safe landing. That's why it's allowed.

But in the late '80s and early '90s players began to put on shows with the rim, e.g. pul-up, swings etc. And the NBA actually prohibited excessive hanging on to the rim.

So grabbing the rim is not a must for the dunk.
even beethoven had his critics. name three of them.
TheMadMagician
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,991
And1: 0
Joined: Jun 12, 2006
Location: Poinciana, FL
 

 

Post#24 » by TheMadMagician » Sun Feb 17, 2008 3:57 pm

leventuysal wrote:OK. FYI, you stupid ****, grabbing the rim is for the player's (and other players') protection only. It ensures a safe landing. That's why it's allowed.

But in the late '80s and early '90s players began to put on shows with the rim, e.g. pul-up, swings etc. And the NBA actually prohibited excessive hanging on to the rim.

So grabbing the rim is not a must for the dunk.


FYI you stupid bitch, It would have been WAY more spectacular if he would have got the rim with his hand. Im tired of all **** gaining up on me. He THREW IT THROUGH FROM TWO FEET AWAY!
maginno
Banned User
Posts: 4,730
And1: 1
Joined: Jul 06, 2007

 

Post#25 » by maginno » Sun Feb 17, 2008 3:59 pm

To deal with the influx of Morons and haters. For your reading

Mirriam Webster - Definition of Dunk
http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/dunk

3 : to throw (a basketball) into the basket from above the rim

Oxford dictionary
http://www.askoxford.com/concise_oed/slamdunk?view=uk

TheMadMagician
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,991
And1: 0
Joined: Jun 12, 2006
Location: Poinciana, FL
 

 

Post#26 » by TheMadMagician » Sun Feb 17, 2008 4:02 pm

maginno wrote:To deal with the influx of haters. For your reading

Mirriam Webster - Definition of Dunk
http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/dunk

3 : to throw (a basketball) into the basket from above the rim

Oxford dictionary
http://www.askoxford.com/concise_oed/slamdunk?view=uk

User avatar
UCFJayBird
Forum Mod - Magic
Forum Mod - Magic
Posts: 27,255
And1: 3,665
Joined: Jul 26, 2003
Location: Orlando, FL
Contact:
     

 

Post#27 » by UCFJayBird » Sun Feb 17, 2008 4:05 pm

yea dude wtf is your problem? Your definition of the word is just WRONG. You're so used to seeing dunks being players hanging on the rim or contacting the rim, but it doesn't have to be for it to be a dunk. He dunked the ball, by the definition of a dunk itself it was dunk.

So grow up, learn to realize when you're wrong. I respect your opinion that you think it would've been better if he had grabbed the rim, but most people feel it's more impressive that he threw it through, because quite frankly that's MUCH harder to do. It also gives it more flare because in real time it looked so much better.

edit: here's the perfect analogy for you to make it easier to understand. When you're eating oreos with milk, do you have to touch the rim of the glass to dunk your oreo into the milk? no.
User avatar
MagicalMan
Analyst
Posts: 3,503
And1: 9
Joined: Jun 12, 2004
Location: Minneapolis, MN

 

Post#28 » by MagicalMan » Sun Feb 17, 2008 4:08 pm

themadmagician wrote:-= original quote snipped =-



I'm not hating, I thougt it was creative and funny, but he did'nt imo, execute it properly. You should all these other dudes to grow up, they're calling me names jut beause they don't agree with what I say.



while the name part is unnecessary, when everyone disagrees with you, that should tell you something. Like you're possibly wrong?
User avatar
Hairy Midget
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,338
And1: 1
Joined: Dec 17, 2005
Location: Orlando
Contact:

 

Post#29 » by Hairy Midget » Sun Feb 17, 2008 4:09 pm

STFU and GTFO

Seriously, this is ridiculous.
Image
User avatar
minimoe
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,931
And1: 0
Joined: Dec 06, 2004

 

Post#30 » by minimoe » Sun Feb 17, 2008 4:16 pm

themadmagician wrote:-= original quote snipped =-



FYI you stupid bitch, It would have been WAY more spectacular if he would have got the rim with his hand. Im tired of all **** gaining up on me. He THREW IT THROUGH FROM TWO FEET AWAY!

They are calling YOU names? lol

Dude just let it go.. I feel like giving you a tissue
There will be life after Dwight.

Image
User avatar
Nothingface
Assistant Coach
Posts: 4,322
And1: 8
Joined: Jan 06, 2006
Location: Spinward Marches

 

Post#31 » by Nothingface » Sun Feb 17, 2008 4:17 pm

Maginno:

Two of the definitions you posted actually counter your argument.

The second two definitions both use the word "thrust".

http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/thrust

thrust /θrʌst/ Pronunciation Key - Show Spelled Pronunciation[thruhst] Pronunciation Key - Show IPA Pronunciation, verb, thrust, thrust
User avatar
The Letter J
Starter
Posts: 2,207
And1: 0
Joined: Sep 30, 2005

 

Post#32 » by The Letter J » Sun Feb 17, 2008 4:17 pm

themadmagician wrote:HE DIDNT GRAB THE F****** RIM! that's a lay up. Kenny Smith said he threw it through. Any high jumper can do that crap.

What he did fits the definition of what a dunk is and is the exact opposite of what the definition of a lay up is.
Image
User avatar
The Letter J
Starter
Posts: 2,207
And1: 0
Joined: Sep 30, 2005

 

Post#33 » by The Letter J » Sun Feb 17, 2008 4:18 pm

Nothingface wrote:To "thrust" something you must be in contact with it. Pushing it in effect.

Since he threw it, by your own definition it was not a dunk.


Who cares though - it was great nonetheless...

Wrong, because the object he is "thrusting" is the basketball which he is in contact with.
Image
User avatar
Nothingface
Assistant Coach
Posts: 4,322
And1: 8
Joined: Jan 06, 2006
Location: Spinward Marches

 

Post#34 » by Nothingface » Sun Feb 17, 2008 4:20 pm

The Letter J wrote:-= original quote snipped =-


Wrong, because the object he is "thrusting" is the basketball which he is in contact with.


He is not in contact with the ball as it goes through the rim, therefore at that point there is no thrusting.

lol, I've never used the word thrust so much :)
Optimus_Steel
RealGM
Posts: 38,310
And1: 12,228
Joined: Sep 16, 2003
Location: Winter Garden, FL
   

 

Post#35 » by Optimus_Steel » Sun Feb 17, 2008 4:22 pm

It was a dunk. And i think it was even more impressive that he threw it down thru the hoop than actually touching the rim. Close minded people.... :nonono:
aka: prorl
User avatar
minimoe
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,931
And1: 0
Joined: Dec 06, 2004

 

Post#36 » by minimoe » Sun Feb 17, 2008 4:23 pm

Nothingface you are making no sence.. To thrust something you have to be in contact with two things? lol
There will be life after Dwight.

Image
User avatar
Nothingface
Assistant Coach
Posts: 4,322
And1: 8
Joined: Jan 06, 2006
Location: Spinward Marches

 

Post#37 » by Nothingface » Sun Feb 17, 2008 4:23 pm

Happyfoosball wrote:He wasn't trying to touch the rim. Superman wouldn't touch the rim. He was high enough that had he wanted too, he could have. But that wouldn't have been dramatic as throwing it through.


Not true.

Because he was so high, there is no way he could reach the rim, unless he launched from closer to the rim.

A jumper cannot change his trajectory mid flight - it is physically impossible. If you plot the arc of a jump (based on centre of gravity) it is exactly the same going down as up. A perfect curve. There is no such thing as "hangtime".
MagicFan3
Banned User
Posts: 8,982
And1: 20
Joined: Jun 21, 2005
Location: Superman!

 

Post#38 » by MagicFan3 » Sun Feb 17, 2008 4:25 pm

Wow... and you call yourself a Magic fan.

Not only was it a dunk, but it was an amazing one. The fact that he got up so high and didn't even need to make contact with the rim made it even more amazing.
User avatar
The Letter J
Starter
Posts: 2,207
And1: 0
Joined: Sep 30, 2005

 

Post#39 » by The Letter J » Sun Feb 17, 2008 4:26 pm

Nothingface wrote:-= original quote snipped =-



He is not in contact with the ball as it goes through the rim, therefore at that point there is no thrusting.

lol, I've never used the word thrust so much :)

That doesn't defy the definition as maggino(sp?) posted it. The ball was thrust. Not dropped. Not arched. Not shot.

Dwight forcibly put the ball through the rim. He thrust the ball. I don't think at this point there is anyway you will concede because you don't want to be wrong. Dwight was in contact with the ball, thus he thrust it. The ball went threw the rim, thus the action exemplifies the definition of a slam dunk. :D
Image
jamlando
Rookie
Posts: 1,031
And1: 0
Joined: Jun 30, 2002
Location: Longwood

 

Post#40 » by jamlando » Sun Feb 17, 2008 4:26 pm

It was a throw down, plain & simple. Stop the insanity. Why would your opinion be worth more than guys who actually play the game? STFU already.

Return to Orlando Magic