Chicago-Memphis-Phoenix-Portland

Moderators: Texas Chuck, BullyKing, Andre Roberstan, loserX, Trader_Joe, Mamba4Goat, pacers33granger, MoneyTalks41890, HartfordWhalers

Village Idiot
General Manager
Posts: 9,505
And1: 2,214
Joined: Jan 23, 2005
Location: Madrid, Spain
   

Chicago-Memphis-Phoenix-Portland 

Post#1 » by Village Idiot » Sun Feb 17, 2008 9:34 pm

Chicago trades:

Ben Gordon
Salary: $4,881,669 Years Remaining: 1
PTS: 20.0 REB: 3.4 AST: 2.8 PER: 15.92

Chris Duhon
Salary: $3,248,000 Years Remaining: 1
PTS: 6.0 REB: 1.9 AST: 4.2 PER: 10.01

2010 1st to Memphis-lottery protect in perpetuity


Chicago receives:

Mike Miller
Salary: $8,376,194 Years Remaining: 3
PTS: 16.9 REB: 6.6 AST: 3.6 PER: 16.04

Jarrett Jack
Salary: $1,217,400 Years Remaining: 2
PTS: 9.4 REB: 2.8 AST: 3.7 PER: 12.40

The Bulls finally get a bigger SG in Mike Miller who is a solid all-around player. He also under contract. Jarrett Jack is a competent back-up combo guard.


Memphis trades:

Mike Miller
Salary: $8,376,194 Years Remaining: 3
PTS: 16.9 REB: 6.6 AST: 3.6 PER: 16.04

Brian Cardinal
Salary: $5,850,000 Years Remaining: 3
PTS: 2.8 REB: 1.9 AST: 0.6 PER: 5.87

Memphis receives:

Eric Piatkowski
6-6 SG / SF from Nebraska
2.1 ppg, 0.7 rpg, 0.5 apg in 6.6 minutes

Raef LaFrentz
Salary: $12,440,787 Years Remaining: 2
PTS: 1.9 REB: 1.7 AST: 0.2 PER: 12.04

$3 million from Portland

2009 1st from Portland- top 10 protected

2010 1st from Chicago-lottery protect in perpetuity

The Grizzlies are looking to start from scratch. They offload their worst contract in the form of Brian Cardinal. LaFrentz expires next season, Pike this season. They also get two probable mid 1st round picks.


Phoenix trades:

Boris Diaw
6-8 SF / PF from France (Foreign)
8.1 ppg, 4.5 rpg, 4.0 apg in 28.7 minutes

Eric Piatkowski
6-6 SG / SF from Nebraska
2.1 ppg, 0.7 rpg, 0.5 apg in 6.6 minutes

2008 1st from Atlanta

Phoenix receives:

Steve Blake
6-3 PG from Maryland
7.8 ppg, 2.5 rpg, 4.7 apg in 28.5 minutes

Channing Frye
6-11 C from Arizona
6.7 ppg, 4.5 rpg, 0.8 apg in 17.9 minutes

2008 2nd from Memphis via Portland

2009 2nd from Portland. The highest of their picks.


Phoenix gets a mobile, young big who can play the pick-and-roll and shoot from 18 ft in Frye. Blake is a solid back-up, Nash lite. Solid passer, great shooter, adequate defender. The Memphis 2nd rounder is better than a late 1st for them since it isn't guaranteed. They also get a 2nd rounder next year.


Portland trades:

Channing Frye
Salary: $2,487,240 Years Remaining: 2
PTS: 6.6 REB: 4.5 AST: 0.8 PER: 13.58

Jarrett Jack
Salary: $1,217,400 Years Remaining: 2
PTS: 9.4 REB: 2.8 AST: 3.7 PER: 12.40

Raef LaFrentz
Salary: $12,440,787 Years Remaining: 2
PTS: 1.9 REB: 1.7 AST: 0.2 PER: 12.04

$3 million to Memphis

2009 1st to Memphis- top 10 protected

2008 2nd from Memphis to Phoenix via Portland

2009 2nd to Phoenix. The highest of their picks.


Portland receives:

Ben Gordon
Salary: $4,881,669 Years Remaining: 1
PTS: 20.0 REB: 3.4 AST: 2.8 PER: 15.92

Boris Diaw
6-8 SF / PF from France (Foreign)
8.1 ppg, 4.5 rpg, 4.0 apg in 28.7 minutes

Chris Duhon
6-1 PG from Duke
6.0 ppg, 1.9 rpg, 4.2 apg in 24.6 minutes

Brian Cardinal
Salary: $5,850,000 Years Remaining: 3
PTS: 2.8 REB: 1.9 AST: 0.6 PER: 5.87

2008 1st from Atlanta via Phoenix

Portland is looking to pare it's roster and upgrade the PG position. Ben Gordon fits in perfectly next to Roy.

Portland get's another mid 1st round pick which they can package with their own to get to move up in the draft or they can get two solid players mid-first round.

Diaw is a solid team player who would do well in Portland's system. Cardinal would be bought out. Taking on his contract is not such a big deal since all the holes on the roster would be filled. Additonally it looks increasingly likely that Miles will take medical retirement and free up a lot of salary cap space before 09. Duhon has an ending contract.
"There are no right answers to wrong questions." - Ursula K. Le Guin
NBAMAN2006
Assistant Coach
Posts: 4,007
And1: 2
Joined: Sep 23, 2005

 

Post#2 » by NBAMAN2006 » Mon Feb 18, 2008 12:01 am

This is really 2 trades combined. One between Portland/Memphis/Chicago and one between Portland/Phoenix.

Overall, I think it is too good for Portland to be realistic.

Make it 2 trades.

1) Portland/Memphis/Chicago

Portland Trades
-Raef LaFrentz to Memphis
-Jarrett Jack to Chicago
-Rights of Joel Freeland to Memphis
-2009 top 10 protected 1st round pick to Memphis
-Memphis's 2008 2nd round pick back to Memphis
-Chicago's 2008 2nd round pick back to Chicago

Portland Recieves
-Ben Gordon from Chicago
-Brian Cardinal from Memphis



Memphis Trades
-Mike Miller to Chicago
-Brian Cardinal to Portland
-Kyle Lowry to Chicago

Memphis Recieves
-Raef LaFrentz from Portland
-Rights to Joel Freeland from Portland
-2009 top 10 protected 1st round pick from Portland
-2010 top 20 protected 1st round pick from Chicago
-Own 2008 2nd round pick back from Portland



Chicago Trades
-Ben Gordon
-2010 top 20 protected 1st round pick to Memphis

Chicago Recieves
-Mike Miller from Memphis
-Kyle Lowry from Memphis
-Jarrett Jack from Portland
-Own 2008 2nd round pick back from Portland



2) Portland/Phoenix

Portland Trades
-Channing Frye to Phoenix
-Steve Blake to Phoenix
-2008 NYK 2nd round pick to Phoenix
-2009 Portland 2nd round pick to Phoenix

Phoenix Trades
-Boris Diaw to Portland
-Eric Piatkowski to Portland
-2008 Atlanta 1st round pick to Portland



Not huge changes, but I think they balance it out a bit.
ecuhus1981
RealGM
Posts: 16,916
And1: 1,583
Joined: Jun 19, 2007
       

 

Post#3 » by ecuhus1981 » Mon Feb 18, 2008 12:21 am

The 6'8 Miller has quite a bit more value than the 6'3 Gordon, and Jack is more valuable than Duhon as well. This deal is not an outrageously protected 1st away; it's either Noah or Thomas away.

MEM can get expirings for Miller/Cardinal, I believe.

PHX gets almost as good a deal as CHI, especially in light of the Bibby deal.

Aside from overpaying, Portland's side is fundamentally flawed. They are not going to scrap their '09 cap flexibility plan for Ben Gordon.
Some people really have a way with words. Other people... not... have... way.
-- Steve Martin
clydestudent1276
Rookie
Posts: 1,180
And1: 5
Joined: Aug 07, 2006
Location: Ontario, Canada
         

 

Post#4 » by clydestudent1276 » Mon Feb 18, 2008 12:26 am

I think it has to be one big trade for salary reasons. And Chicago does really well in this deal.
Man, we talkin' bout practice
User avatar
grizzleGM
Analyst
Posts: 3,279
And1: 0
Joined: Feb 04, 2005

 

Post#5 » by grizzleGM » Mon Feb 18, 2008 2:20 am

If Memphis can't get expirings this year for MMiller and Cardinal, then I think they will wait until draft night to move them.
LakerFanMan
Lead Assistant
Posts: 4,658
And1: 16
Joined: Dec 22, 2006

 

Post#6 » by LakerFanMan » Mon Feb 18, 2008 3:21 am

The suns don't have much incentive to do this. They give up Diaw and the Atlanta 1st and get back not much of anything that does much for them. Blake helps a little off the bench but enough for Diaq and a 1st? Not too sure.
Wizenheimer
RealGM
Posts: 36,335
And1: 8,050
Joined: May 28, 2007

 

Post#7 » by Wizenheimer » Mon Feb 18, 2008 5:45 am

this leaves portland with a backcourt of Roy, Gordon, Duhon, and Rodriguez. Far too small and far to thin to compete now or in the future.

Furthermore, portland trades frye and lafrentz...which cuts deeply into their C/PF depth, for the purposes of adding a 4th SF in Diaw.

and to achieve this poorly balanced roster, portland also gets to give away a 1st round pick, a pair of 2nd round picks, and 3 million dollars. They also take on the practically useles brian cardinal and his absurd contract.

there is no reason to include Phoenix in this trade. Basically, you have portland sending them blake, frye, and 2 draft picks for boris diaw...yuck!
Outlaw, Webster, and Jones all play Diaw's postition, and play it better. It makes no sense.
User avatar
treis
RealGM
Posts: 16,668
And1: 60
Joined: Mar 01, 2005

 

Post#8 » by treis » Mon Feb 18, 2008 6:13 am

Wizenheimer wrote:this leaves portland with a backcourt of Roy, Gordon, Duhon, and Rodriguez. Far too small and far to thin to compete now or in the future.


This is a really odd way to look at this trade. Portland trades two guards (Jack and Blake), for two better guards (Duhon+Gordon). The Blazer's back court gets much better from this trade, not worse.
Image
NBAMAN2006
Assistant Coach
Posts: 4,007
And1: 2
Joined: Sep 23, 2005

 

Post#9 » by NBAMAN2006 » Mon Feb 18, 2008 6:26 am

Duhon isnt better than Jack or Blake. Dude blows.

But I do agree, the Blazers guard rotation would be absolutley fine. Gordon/Roy/Fernandez/Rodriguez/Duhon with Martell and Jones playing spot SG minutes. Absolutley great depth.
Wizenheimer
RealGM
Posts: 36,335
And1: 8,050
Joined: May 28, 2007

 

Post#10 » by Wizenheimer » Mon Feb 18, 2008 6:29 am

treis wrote:-= original quote snipped =-



This is a really odd way to look at this trade. Portland trades two guards (Jack and Blake), for two better guards (Duhon+Gordon). The Blazer's back court gets much better from this trade, not worse.


gordon is the best, but blake and jack are better then duhon. They are also both bigger then either gordon or duhon. Your assertion that Portland's backcourt would be "much better" is a view I don't share, but then I've seen Blake's value to portland over the course of 50+ games.

and again...even though you seem inclined to ignore it...Gordon's contract status reduces his trade value and duhon's reduces his, especially for portland. There's no way around that. Duhon would be a UFA this summer and Gordon will be RFA. So essentially, it could be...and almost certainly would be...blake + Jack for gordon, and gordon may decide to play for the QO and bolt portland after a little more then a season. And of course, Gordon is injured right now isn't he. Is it the wrist on his shooting hand?...how does that affect his value?
User avatar
coldfish
Forum Mod - Bulls
Forum Mod - Bulls
Posts: 60,582
And1: 37,859
Joined: Jun 11, 2004
Location: Right in the middle
   

 

Post#11 » by coldfish » Mon Feb 18, 2008 6:35 am

Miller is a big source of disagreement on the Bulls board.

.....

My take is that he is a two year rental. No way he gets extended. That leaves the team in 2010 with nothing to show for this, other than still owing a first round pick.

The Bulls are not in win now mode and aren't really close. If this was the best the Bulls could get for Gordon, I would play hardball with him. Maybe you get him cheap and maybe you lose him for nothing. Even if he walks, the team is still better off because they retain their pick.

Last note, Miller and Jack combine to make $11M. That starts making it hard to retain Luol Deng. If Gordon took a 6 year $60M deal, it would start at 7.7M, or 3.3M less. Bulls would have $62M against the cap, allowing on 5 to 8 million to sign Deng.

For Bulls fans who understand the situation, this is a HORRIBLE trade.
Wizenheimer
RealGM
Posts: 36,335
And1: 8,050
Joined: May 28, 2007

 

Post#12 » by Wizenheimer » Mon Feb 18, 2008 6:44 am

NBAMAN2006 wrote:Duhon isnt better than Jack or Blake. Dude blows.

But I do agree, the Blazers guard rotation would be absolutley fine. Gordon/Roy/Fernandez/Rodriguez/Duhon with Martell and Jones playing spot SG minutes. Absolutley great depth.


duhon will be a free agent and he won't be resigned so you can cross him off of next year's depth chart.

Gordon's right wrist is injured...the wrist of his shooting hand, so you may have to cross him off this year's depth chart.

Jones could miss 5 weeks with a chronic knee problem so you can cross him off this year's depth chart as well.

Fernandez is still under contract to another team and could end up making 3 million a year more to stay in Europe, so it is quite premature to add him to next year's dept chart yet.

Rodriguez is not close to being dependable yet...if ever...so adding him as an integral part of either year's depth chart is in substantial fashion, wishful thinking.

Webster has yet to demonstrate the ball-handling ability to be a SG in anything but brief situational (or desperate) circumstances.

So I'd say your
Absolutley great depth
is hypothetical at best and fictitious if not.

and of course, gordon's contract mean's any trade for him carries a lot of risk for the team that receives him.
User avatar
treis
RealGM
Posts: 16,668
And1: 60
Joined: Mar 01, 2005

 

Post#13 » by treis » Mon Feb 18, 2008 6:59 am

Wizenheimer wrote:-= original quote snipped =-



gordon is the best, but blake and jack are better then duhon. They are also both bigger then either gordon or duhon. Your assertion that Portland's backcourt would be "much better" is a view I don't share, but then I've seen Blake's value to portland over the course of 50+ games.


Yeah, ok. I'm not even going to bother arguing this because everyone and their brother knows that Gordon+Duhon is a lot better than Jack+Blake.

Wizenheimer wrote:and again...even though you seem inclined to ignore it...Gordon's contract status reduces his trade value and duhon's reduces his, especially for portland. There's no way around that. Duhon would be a UFA this summer and Gordon will be RFA. So essentially, it could be...and almost certainly would be...blake + Jack for gordon, and gordon may decide to play for the QO and bolt portland after a little more then a season. And of course, Gordon is injured right now isn't he. Is it the wrist on his shooting hand?...how does that affect his value?


It really doesn't reduce his trade value. Gordon didn't ask for an exorbitant amount. The only reason he wasn't extended is because the Bulls are really cheap. He won't take the QO, and he will be signed to a contract commensurate with his abilities this off-season.
Image
ecuhus1981
RealGM
Posts: 16,916
And1: 1,583
Joined: Jun 19, 2007
       

 

Post#14 » by ecuhus1981 » Mon Feb 18, 2008 4:25 pm

You're wrong, treis, and Wizenheimer provided a myriad of reasons this trade is too nice for CHI.
Some people really have a way with words. Other people... not... have... way.
-- Steve Martin

Return to Trades and Transactions