Marvin Williams vs Josh Chilldress

Moderators: Clyde Frazier, Doctor MJ, trex_8063, penbeast0, PaulieWal

Pick One

Marvin Williams
13
93%
Josh Chilldress
1
7%
 
Total votes: 14

Hood President
Senior
Posts: 504
And1: 19
Joined: Oct 01, 2007

Marvin Williams vs Josh Chilldress 

Post#1 » by Hood President » Mon Feb 18, 2008 7:53 pm

Who ya got
Twitter.com/Hood_President Follow Me!!!!!
KnicksH20
Rookie
Posts: 1,056
And1: 41
Joined: Jul 27, 2006
Location: NYC
 

 

Post#2 » by KnicksH20 » Mon Feb 18, 2008 7:58 pm

Definately Marvin. Upside is tremendous.

Childress meanwhile has an ugly jumpshot and isn't as young as Marvin (21!)
User avatar
hermes
RealGM
Posts: 96,560
And1: 25,528
Joined: Aug 27, 2007
Location: the restaurant at the end of the universe
 

 

Post#3 » by hermes » Mon Feb 18, 2008 10:02 pm

marvin

:spam:
risktaker91
Banned User
Posts: 2,487
And1: 0
Joined: Apr 18, 2007

 

Post#4 » by risktaker91 » Mon Feb 18, 2008 11:47 pm

I'll go with Marvin. I think he will be a 20/5/5 player, or close to that, in a few years. Childress is a great role player, but nothing more.
User avatar
BigSlam
Forum Mod - Hornets
Forum Mod - Hornets
Posts: 51,164
And1: 8,360
Joined: Jul 01, 2005

 

Post#5 » by BigSlam » Tue Feb 19, 2008 1:22 am

I like Chil.

Plays both ends. Can play the 1,2 and 3. VERY efficient.

Reminds me a lot of a Pippen lite.
B B M F 'ers
User avatar
High 5
RealGM
Posts: 15,663
And1: 2,191
Joined: Apr 21, 2006

 

Post#6 » by High 5 » Tue Feb 19, 2008 2:10 am

Chill is an efficient scorer, great finisher and remarkable offensive rebounder, but he's pretty bad defensively. Chill has been playing better than Marvin since Marvin's shot stopped falling, but Marvin has the potential to be 10x better than Chill.
User avatar
BigSlam
Forum Mod - Hornets
Forum Mod - Hornets
Posts: 51,164
And1: 8,360
Joined: Jul 01, 2005

 

Post#7 » by BigSlam » Tue Feb 19, 2008 4:30 am

High 5 wrote:Chill is an efficient scorer, great finisher and remarkable offensive rebounder, but he's pretty bad defensively. Chill has been playing better than Marvin since Marvin's shot stopped falling, but Marvin has the potential to be 10x better than Chill.


Didn't Chil average something like 24, 6 and 6 starting for the stretch of time that Johnson was out late last season?
B B M F 'ers
User avatar
High 5
RealGM
Posts: 15,663
And1: 2,191
Joined: Apr 21, 2006

 

Post#8 » by High 5 » Tue Feb 19, 2008 7:07 am

BigSlam wrote:-= original quote snipped =-



Didn't Chil average something like 24, 6 and 6 starting for the stretch of time that Johnson was out late last season?


Chill had some really good games, but he never averaged 24/6/6 over any stretch. He only broke 20 points three times while Joe was out. Only hit 6 assists once.

Don't get me wrong, I love Chill. He has won a lot of games with his clutch rebounding and great finishes around the basket. He just isn't as good as Marvin offensively or defensively. Better rebounder though. Which hopefully will change.
conleyorbust
Lead Assistant
Posts: 4,837
And1: 0
Joined: May 24, 2007

 

Post#9 » by conleyorbust » Tue Feb 19, 2008 4:00 pm

Chil has been good for us but he doesn't really ever create his own shot and because he scores off the attention given to other players, it doesn't really make him a factor as a playmaker. I think Chil is one of the best in the league at moving to an open space under the basket and finishing though.

Marv has a lot of potential, I'm not as high on him as some are. I don't seen him ever being much of a factor as a playmaker either. He needs to improve his rebounding too. He could be a great scorer if he could hit from 3, right now he takes a lot of deep 2s.

Return to Player Comparisons