ImageImageImageImageImage

2008 and 2010 Dallas Firsts...

Moderators: Rich Rane, NyCeEvO

User avatar
Pugsley_2491
Bench Warmer
Posts: 1,253
And1: 3
Joined: Aug 29, 2007

2008 and 2010 Dallas Firsts... 

Post#1 » by Pugsley_2491 » Mon Feb 18, 2008 7:24 pm

Are there any protections on them? I hope they're both unprotected.

Edit: Also, who do you think we can get with this years first. I forgot where I read it but it said we could package that with our own pick (assuming we stay on the cusp of a playoff spot) and end up with a top 10 pick :clap:
User avatar
GenericUsername
Assistant Coach
Posts: 4,243
And1: 5
Joined: Feb 17, 2006

 

Post#2 » by GenericUsername » Mon Feb 18, 2008 8:46 pm

This year's first probably light protection, top 5-top 10. For sure the 2010 pick is lottery protected.

When Cuban traded for DAmpier and Nash, he was worried he didn't have protection on the pick that went to GS, so I don't think he'll make that mistake again.
User avatar
Da big3
Starter
Posts: 2,405
And1: 2
Joined: Nov 29, 2007
Location: #hellobrooklyn

 

Post#3 » by Da big3 » Mon Feb 18, 2008 9:50 pm

can some explain to me what unprotected and protected draft picks mean?
User avatar
GenericUsername
Assistant Coach
Posts: 4,243
And1: 5
Joined: Feb 17, 2006

 

Post#4 » by GenericUsername » Mon Feb 18, 2008 11:05 pm

For instance, in 2010 if the Mavs are pretty bad and end up in the lottery, and the pick is lottery protected then Mavs keep the pick, and the pick is defaulted for the next year (usually the protection decreases as the years increase). Essentially, NJ would get the Mav's 2011 pick since they wouldn't have gotten the 2010 pick.

so in 2011 it might be top 10, in 2012 top 5 and sometimes it will either go unprotected, turn into a second rounder to consumate the deal, or turn into cash.

Unprotected means it doesn't matter what position the pick is at, the other team gets it.
User avatar
vincecarter4pres
RealGM
Posts: 51,064
And1: 3,840
Joined: May 30, 2005
Location: New Jeruz
Contact:
     

 

Post#5 » by vincecarter4pres » Mon Feb 18, 2008 11:24 pm

I don't think we are done making moves after the Kidd deal.

On top of this, I'm sure with Harris and Kidd's bad attitude out of the locker room, and Curly, Boone and SWat's constant improvement we are not even close to out of the playoffs.

If we get Mike Miller we get even better.

That said, if we do miss the playoffs, and trade Wright for a 2nd rounder we could honestly move up to a top 5 pick easily with the combo of the 2 Dallas picks, our lotto pick and both 2nd rounders.

I mean if we wind up lotto, unless wee get extremely lucky we could wind up between 10-14.
That combined with 2 more 1st rounders, one from this year, one of the better 2nd rounders and another 2nd rounder, maybe combined with a guy like Marcus Williams could easily net us a t0p 5 pick if someone we loved was still available.

We could also package all these picks with RJ and filler for a legit big, although highly doubtful.
Image
Rich Rane wrote:I think we're all missing the point here. vc4pres needs to stop watching games.
User avatar
lurkingobeiscity
Assistant Coach
Posts: 4,263
And1: 0
Joined: Feb 15, 2004
Location: left field

 

Post#6 » by lurkingobeiscity » Tue Feb 19, 2008 3:45 am

Usually when a team trades multiple picks, the first one is always unprotected (not that it matters anyway). The second one might be protected but I doubt it. It wouldn't make sense for Dallas to push their owed picks further back into what will likely be a rebuilding period.
Image
Enetric wrote:Although Brook is close....despite the fact that he may be the weirdest guy in the league. Love the voice...(one time...me and Robin were in a tickle fight...and I was like...Robin...stop teasing me...)
jzmagik
Banned User
Posts: 5,528
And1: 0
Joined: May 06, 2005
Location: NYC

 

Post#7 » by jzmagik » Tue Feb 19, 2008 5:47 am

Wouldn't they announce whether the picks were protected or not? As far as my knowledge goes, neither of the picks are protected.
User avatar
Rich Rane
Senior Mod - Nets
Senior Mod - Nets
Posts: 36,951
And1: 15,620
Joined: Jun 29, 2005
       

 

Post#8 » by Rich Rane » Tue Feb 19, 2008 1:20 pm

I hope they're protected. They become less and less protected with each year if I'm correct.
jzmagik
Banned User
Posts: 5,528
And1: 0
Joined: May 06, 2005
Location: NYC

 

Post#9 » by jzmagik » Tue Feb 19, 2008 9:47 pm

ESPN reported 2008 is lotto protected, 2010 has no restrictions.
User avatar
Serpo
Veteran
Posts: 2,964
And1: 0
Joined: Jan 15, 2008

 

Post#10 » by Serpo » Tue Feb 19, 2008 10:13 pm

thats the best combination 2010's will be the better one if Dallas isn't collapsing this season .
User avatar
crackjack
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 21,825
And1: 7
Joined: Sep 30, 2002
Contact:

 

Post#11 » by crackjack » Tue Feb 19, 2008 10:20 pm

Wonder why the 2008 one would be lottery protected. Dallas isn't likely to be in the lottery this summer.
User avatar
ranger001
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 26,938
And1: 3,752
Joined: Feb 23, 2001
   

 

Post#12 » by ranger001 » Wed Feb 20, 2008 6:00 pm

jzmagik wrote:ESPN reported 2008 is lotto protected, 2010 has no restrictions.

That cant be right. Suppose some catastrophe happens to Dallas and they end up in the lottery. That would mean they could end up giving away first rounders in 2 consecutive years, 2009 and 2010 which would violate the Ted Stepien rule.
User avatar
Pugsley_2491
Bench Warmer
Posts: 1,253
And1: 3
Joined: Aug 29, 2007

 

Post#13 » by Pugsley_2491 » Wed Feb 20, 2008 6:01 pm

no the 2010 one would just be bumped up to 2011

Return to Brooklyn Nets