ImageImageImageImageImage

Yes Ben Gordon is being shopped! Perfect timing!

Moderators: Rich Rane, NyCeEvO

User avatar
RJ 24
Senior
Posts: 510
And1: 10
Joined: May 19, 2007
Location: NJ

Yes Ben Gordon is being shopped! Perfect timing! 

Post#1 » by RJ 24 » Tue Feb 19, 2008 10:01 pm

According to the Wiretap he is being shopped. The kid is young and he is already very good. He has started only 1/2 of the games he has played and hes averaging 20 ppg. He is shooting at 92% from the line, 42 from the field, and 39 from deep. If we package our newly acquired picks, we could definatly land him if the rumours are true. Then sign him to a big extension.
Harris
Gordon
RJ
Nenad
Boone

RUN N GUN
Image
KB24VC15
Banned User
Posts: 160
And1: 0
Joined: Dec 22, 2007

 

Post#2 » by KB24VC15 » Tue Feb 19, 2008 10:05 pm

isnt it up to frank whether we run n gun??

MOTION OFFENSE FOR THE WIN

even with a pg like kidd this guy did not want to run
he loves his MOTION OFFENSE
S.I.C. GM
Veteran
Posts: 2,939
And1: 2
Joined: Jul 31, 2002

 

Post#3 » by S.I.C. GM » Tue Feb 19, 2008 10:07 pm

How about this?

VC and Swift for Gordon and Wallace.

2010 here we come.
SIC
User avatar
Netaman
Assistant Coach
Posts: 4,265
And1: 1,321
Joined: Jun 04, 2004

 

Post#4 » by Netaman » Tue Feb 19, 2008 10:14 pm

S.I.C. GM wrote:How about this?

VC and Swift for Gordon and Wallace.

2010 here we come.


2 problems

1- Swift can not be traded with any other players in his first 2 months with Nets. So in other words unless we package him with draft picks he cannot be traded.

2- Wallace's contract - no chance in hell

I like the idea of somehow snaking Gordon for VC, but I think it would have to be in a 3 team trade. I don't know if I see a straight up match.
S.I.C. GM
Veteran
Posts: 2,939
And1: 2
Joined: Jul 31, 2002

 

Post#5 » by S.I.C. GM » Tue Feb 19, 2008 10:27 pm

Netaman wrote:-= original quote snipped =-



2 problems

1- Swift can not be traded with any other players in his first 2 months with Nets. So in other words unless we package him with draft picks he cannot be traded.

2- Wallace's contract - no chance in hell

I like the idea of somehow snaking Gordon for VC, but I think it would have to be in a 3 team trade. I don't know if I see a straight up match.


Damn!! for the Swift.

Wallace's contract gets off the books the year Lebron and Wade's contract do. So I dont have a problem with taking Wallace's contract.

Dreaming: Harris, Wade, Lebron, SWill, Nenad/Boone
Bench: Gordon and all the picks we collected over the three years
SIC
User avatar
lurkingobeiscity
Assistant Coach
Posts: 4,263
And1: 0
Joined: Feb 15, 2004
Location: left field

 

Post#6 » by lurkingobeiscity » Tue Feb 19, 2008 11:16 pm

Thank god none of you are GM.
Image
Enetric wrote:Although Brook is close....despite the fact that he may be the weirdest guy in the league. Love the voice...(one time...me and Robin were in a tickle fight...and I was like...Robin...stop teasing me...)
User avatar
Krapinsky
RealGM
Posts: 20,712
And1: 1,952
Joined: May 13, 2007
Location: Los Angeles

 

Post#7 » by Krapinsky » Tue Feb 19, 2008 11:16 pm

Just guessing here, but you could still do two separate trades couldn't you?- Swift for Gordon, Carter for Wallace.
FinnTheHuman wrote: Your post is just garbage.

NewWolvesOrder wrote:Garbage post, indeed.
User avatar
RJ 24
Senior
Posts: 510
And1: 10
Joined: May 19, 2007
Location: NJ

 

Post#8 » by RJ 24 » Tue Feb 19, 2008 11:21 pm

Dr.Krapinsky wrote:Just guessing here, but you could still do two separate trades couldn't you?- Swift for Gordon, Carter for Wallace.

Yep that would work. We get our cap relief when Bron, Melo, & Wade are FAs and we get a great young SG to come start until then, becoming the recipient to the 6th man award again!

:pray:
Image
chanchan85
Senior
Posts: 546
And1: 1
Joined: Feb 15, 2005
     

 

Post#9 » by chanchan85 » Tue Feb 19, 2008 11:23 pm

I still think my idea(which ive posted in the trade board before) is ideal for all teams involved.


NJ Nets get: Malik Rose, Q Rich, Ben Gordon

Chicago get: Vince Carter, Jamal Magloire

NY Knicks get: Ben Wallace

My idea definitely beats the rumored Carter for J O'neil which makes no sense.
User avatar
Rollydog
Lead Assistant
Posts: 4,665
And1: 7
Joined: May 08, 2003

 

Post#10 » by Rollydog » Tue Feb 19, 2008 11:23 pm

The problem is Ben Gordon needs to be resigned. I wager he'll be getting at least 6 years 50 million. Couple that with Wallace's contract, and you have some problems. Of course, Wallace has 2 years left, VC has 3 with a team option on the 4th, so you never know. Maybe something more realistic would be VC + Boone for Joe Smith (1 year left), Gordon, and Griffin. In that scenario you have a lot of the money going to Chicago, so they might pass.

One other thing is I'd be down for trading RJ just as much as Vince, maybe more since his value is high right now, while Vince's is low.
User avatar
RJ 24
Senior
Posts: 510
And1: 10
Joined: May 19, 2007
Location: NJ

 

Post#11 » by RJ 24 » Tue Feb 19, 2008 11:27 pm

I would also do Marcus Williams, Jamal Magloire, and our (from Dallas) 2008 first round draft pick for Ben Gordon. Then sign him up long term.

Harris/DA
VC/Gordon/Ager
RJ/Boki/Hassell/Van Horn
Nenad/SWAT/Swift
Boone/Diop

In Thorn We Trust.

Chicago would definatly do this deal. I would even throw in a future pick.
Image
User avatar
Pugsley_2491
Bench Warmer
Posts: 1,253
And1: 3
Joined: Aug 29, 2007

 

Post#12 » by Pugsley_2491 » Tue Feb 19, 2008 11:36 pm

idk about gordon...
HitMan52
Starter
Posts: 2,071
And1: 33
Joined: Jun 26, 2006
Location: 7th Banner to Chicago

 

Post#13 » by HitMan52 » Tue Feb 19, 2008 11:47 pm

RJ 24 wrote:I would also do Marcus Williams, Jamal Magloire, and our (from Dallas) 2008 first round draft pick for Ben Gordon. Then sign him up long term.

Harris/DA
VC/Gordon/Ager
RJ/Boki/Hassell/Van Horn
Nenad/SWAT/Swift
Boone/Diop

In Thorn We Trust.

Chicago would definatly do this deal. I would even throw in a future pick.


Actually, I would rather keep Gordon. I dont think Nets and Bulls are good trading partners unless you guys want Wallace in a salary dump move for us.
User avatar
Birth of the Cool
Analyst
Posts: 3,150
And1: 1,560
Joined: Dec 23, 2005

 

Post#14 » by Birth of the Cool » Tue Feb 19, 2008 11:55 pm

The only real benefit I see with Ben Gordon over VC is age (6 year difference) and if that's the way the Nets are going then it might be of interest for both parties.

Other than that I don't see the reasoning.

Ben Gordon just turned down a 50 million / 5 year contract offer with the Bulls and VC is getting paid 61.8 / 4 years. What is Ben Gordon looking for ?

Here are their career stats:

Ben
FG: 43%
3pt: 41%
FT: 86%
Rebounds: 3
Assists: 3
PPG: 18

Vince
FG: 45%
3pt: 37%
FT: 79%
Rebounds: 6
Assists: 4
PPG: 24

Both Ben and VC are not up to par this year and neither are their respective teams.

This year alone Ben's defense vs SG is 19.4 per
while Vince's defense vs SG is 12.5 per
as a gauge Paul Pierce's defense vs SG is 10.9

you do have to consider Ben is a tweener so he has played PG for the Bulls but with Harris & Marcus here Ben would be the Nets SG.

and if guys don't like VC jumpshooting consider this year on a knobby ankle 71% of his attempts are jumpshots while 83% of Ben Gordon's shots are jumpshots.

finally look at positive impact on their teams. VC for all his criticism has the most positive impact on his team (incl. when Kidd was here) at a roland rating of +6.9, while Gordon is the 6th most positive impact player on his team (3 guys ahead of him I ignored since they didn't play significant minutes) at -1.9.
Using Pierce again as a gauge he has a +10.5 roland rating, which is only behind KG. However roland ratings are only a reflection of impact within a team and can't use these #'s as a comparison but it's an indication on what type of positive impact each player provides to their respective teams.

I'd pass unless the Nets are looking to go total youth movement and even then I think Thorn could look around for a 'lesser' name with just as much upside but less $$ than Gordon.

My thinking is see if VC has a better 2nd half (which he usually does) and then if you want to go youth hopefully a better 2nd half will increase interest in him in the off-season where you trade him, but if you want to retool & his 2nd half was good he can still be a good piece for the Nets going forward.
User avatar
NjNeTs1029
Starter
Posts: 2,408
And1: 98
Joined: Jan 28, 2007
   

 

Post#15 » by NjNeTs1029 » Tue Feb 19, 2008 11:57 pm

I like Gordon but no way in hell i want the nets to have to take ben wallaces contract also
SLIMM07
Rookie
Posts: 1,095
And1: 0
Joined: Jan 11, 2005

 

Post#16 » by SLIMM07 » Wed Feb 20, 2008 12:36 am

lurkingobeiscity wrote:Thank god none of you are GM.


Agreed some of these trades being thrown around are just crazy , Nets don't need JO that's like the worst one being thrown around
User avatar
Serpo
Veteran
Posts: 2,964
And1: 0
Joined: Jan 15, 2008

 

Post#17 » by Serpo » Wed Feb 20, 2008 1:04 am

Gordon wants to much $$$ this summer , wouldn't pick him up .
User avatar
superemxguy
Senior
Posts: 709
And1: 0
Joined: Dec 31, 2004

 

Post#18 » by superemxguy » Wed Feb 20, 2008 1:21 am

I think a deal with Houston Rockets makes more sense.

They are lacking scoring punch and Vince Carter provides that.

They got young talents like Luther Head, Aaron Brooke, Bonzi , Steve Francis, Mike James , Karl Landry that we could get back.
SIC Wrote "If VC takes over and leads the Nets to the second round, I will man up and say I was WRONG." ---I would like to apologize for saying that with VC we can't advance to the second round. So to all the VC supporters you guys were right.
User avatar
NotYoAvgNBAFan
Junior
Posts: 393
And1: 1
Joined: Feb 18, 2008

 

Post#19 » by NotYoAvgNBAFan » Wed Feb 20, 2008 1:24 am

What the hell you need Ben Gordon for?

:crazy: You need to focus on a Mike Miller with some size perhaps not Gordon. :nod:

Return to Brooklyn Nets