CB to be on Homer's Show

Fort Minor · Post #141 » by **Fort Minor** » Wed Feb 20, 2008 9:54 pm

Sideways wrote:-= original quote snipped =-

Because if they can debunk what Buckskin said then they can remove him as credible. Then they can ignore his support for Europa's report on the team meeting. That info makes Mo look like a tool. They already think Europa's report was bulls**t so now they can (in their own minds) remove any doubt that Mo did or said anything wrong.

It's called an agenda and it stops a lot of poster on here from considering any other possibilities.

jerrod · Post #142 » by **jerrod** » Wed Feb 20, 2008 10:04 pm

Sideways wrote:-= original quote snipped =-

Because if they can debunk what Buckskin said then they can remove him as credible. Then they can ignore his support for Europa's report on the team meeting. That info makes Mo look like a tool. They already think Europa's report was bulls**t so now they can (in their own minds) remove any doubt that Mo did or said anything wrong.

It's called an agenda and it stops a lot of poster on here from considering any other possibilities.

so i've been meaning to ask

what kind of tinfoil have you found works best for a hat?

REDDzone · Post #143 » by **REDDzone** » Wed Feb 20, 2008 10:04 pm

Sideways wrote:-= original quote snipped =-

Because if they can debunk what Buckskin said then they can remove him as credible. Then they can ignore his support for Europa's report on the team meeting. That info makes Mo look like a tool. They already think Europa's report was bulls**t so now they can (in their own minds) remove any doubt that Mo did or said anything wrong.

It's called an agenda and it stops a lot of poster on here from considering any other possibilities.

Oh snap.

Seriously though, I continue to say I'm not sure why people still question Bucksskinsfan, he has broken numerous things that noone else knew, like unreleased injuries, and lineups before games.

And some bigger things that were confirmed by the likes of GAD and xtitan, unless of course neither of those have credibility with posters questioning Bucksskinsfan either.

carmelbrownqueen · Post #144 » by **carmelbrownqueen** » Wed Feb 20, 2008 10:12 pm

BuckSkins Fan wrote:-= original quote snipped =-

First thing to get out of the way is we all know their is a serious lack of leadership on this team. Ya I know...No sh$t. No matter what anyone tells you the team Captains were picked by asskohl himself. Yes the players voted, but Bobby got 11 known votes that were read outloud, with 15 voting, how can he not have been made a Captain. Since Bobby is not a Captain, he has kept quiet about the ridiculous ongoings of this team. Until two months ago, first week of Dec, Bobby went to LK to tell him about the problems that are building. Nothing changed. Then Bobby went to LH. Nothing change. Bobby went to asskohl himself to enlighten this (Please Use More Appropriate Word) of an owner the dire mess his team is in. Nothing changed.
I cant tell you what exactly Bobby said during the meeting, but he basically "went off" on the current structure. LK, LH, and asskohl. He challenged the players, inspite of the poor rotations, the playing time, the selfish play, and the 114,000 other problems, to go out give it 110 percent each game, each half, each quater, and every possession. Then Bogut repeated what Bobby said and yes, Mo told him to shut the f up. You just on a rookie deal.

Bobby then went back at LK and his poor rotations, specifically asking why the hell does a player that is hot, and having a great quater, sit out the next entire quarter. Lk said Bobby isn't with us, he has asked for a trade. Des then stood up and said, Coach, this aint going in the right direction. This needs to end. LK said he had to gameplan for the Hornets and left. Thats when Mo chimed in with the ass kissing comments that Des has heard all year long.

Now if the Bucks read this F$uck You. If you want to know who I am, I am Larry Kryskowiaks gay lover and all the info came from Larry as he cried in my arms because of his complete failure as a head coach. Any questions.
To add something else, this sorry as organization has two seperate trades involving CV & Bobby going somewhere, but the ass hats of the front office cant agree on them.

Milwaukee Bucks, were absolutely f$ucking amazing happens.

Care to elaborate Bucksskinfan?

Sideways · Post #145 » by **Sideways** » Wed Feb 20, 2008 11:00 pm

jerrod wrote:-= original quote snipped =-

so i've been meaning to ask

what kind of tinfoil have you found works best for a hat?

The stuff your mom gives me.

rilamann · Post #146 » by **rilamann** » Wed Feb 20, 2008 11:27 pm

icat2000 wrote:-= original quote snipped =-

The saddest thing is that the Bucks brought into the Mo Show and paid him the moolah for a 6th man who is short, can't defend, make an entry pass and run an offense.

Mo Williams is laughing all the way to the bank.

The Bucks thought Mo Williams was a good ''basketball player'' because he could score 20pts on a bad team.

The Bucks used the same critera that the average 12 year old does when they judged how good of a basketball player Mo Williams is and decided to re-sign him.

''He is a cool guy because he can score 20pts a game and has a funny show called the ''the Mo Williams''show.

Who cares if he cant play defense or run an offense or has a joke of a basketball IQ,he can score 20pts a game (on a terrible team) and he is cool.

Nowak008 · Post #147 » by **Nowak008** » Wed Feb 20, 2008 11:44 pm

rilamann wrote:-= original quote snipped =-

The Bucks thought Mo Williams was a good ''basketball player'' because he could score 20pts on a bad team.

The Bucks used the same critera that the average 12 year old does when they judged how good of a basketball player Mo Williams is and decided to re-sign him.

''He is a cool guy because he can score 20pts a game and has a funny show called the ''the Mo Williams''show.

Who cares if he cant play defense or run an offense or has a joke of a basketball IQ,he can score 20pts a game (on a terrible team) and he is cool.

I never understood this. Wouldn't it be harder to score on a bad team? The opposing team can center their efforts on taking away our limited options.

icat2000 · Post #148 » by **icat2000** » Wed Feb 20, 2008 11:51 pm

That's what happens with Mo when he holds onto the ball too long the defense collapses on him. And all teams know that either Mo or Redd take the lion's share so its easy defensive assignments for the opposition.

europa · Post #149 » by **europa** » Thu Feb 21, 2008 12:16 am

Nowak008 wrote:-= original quote snipped =-

I never understood this. Wouldn't it be harder to score on a bad team? The opposing team can center their efforts on taking away our limited options.

Can I copy and paste this for the next time people start ripping on Michael Redd? I promise to give you full credit for saying it and everything.

jerrod · Post #150 » by **jerrod** » Thu Feb 21, 2008 1:09 am

Sideways wrote:-= original quote snipped =-

The stuff your mom gives me.

that's what you came up with?

seriously? yikes

i just thought your elaborate conspiracy theory was funny

raferfenix · Post #151 » by **raferfenix** » Thu Feb 21, 2008 2:35 am

europa wrote:I don't know if the Mo voting thing happened but I do know that BuckSkins has been extremely reliable when it comes to providing information about the team for us. So if he says it happened, I think the chances that it did are significantly greater than the chances that it didn't.

But even if it didn't, I believe there are enough things going on with Mo - both on and off the court - that should have this team extremely concerned about his role with the Bucks going forward. In my opinion there have always been questions about whether the Bucks could contend with Mo as their starting PG but one thing I never questioned before was his attitude. But now that's come into play in rather alarming ways in my opinion. On the surface, he strikes me as a guy who's let the money go to his head.

In any event, the last place this team should be looking for leadership in my opinion is Mo Williams. He has enough issues on the court which make me seriously question whether he's the right player for that role. But now there are also plenty of things going on off the court which should make him one of the last players on the team who should assume such a role. In my opinion.

Agreed entirely about Mo. I was a big Mo fan until I started hearing about hte lockerroom stuff going on---there's just no space for that on a team as young and with as many problems as ours already has.

The worst part of it is that I think Bogut and Yi's development is beign afftected by us having a PG who just doesn't see the court well and who has massive bouts of selfishness during games.

Nowak008 · Post #152 » by **Nowak008** » Thu Feb 21, 2008 4:11 am

europa wrote:-= original quote snipped =-

Can I copy and paste this for the next time people start ripping on Michael Redd? I promise to give you full credit for saying it and everything.

Sure. One thing I never bought in the Redd arguments.

step3profit · Post #153 » by **step3profit** » Fri Feb 22, 2008 5:07 am

Nowak008 wrote:-= original quote snipped =-

Sure. One thing I never bought in the Redd arguments.

I think it's fairly obvious that, since every time the other team gets the ball, you get it back, someone is going to score points sooner or later. so even if you have fairly terrible NBA players, someone will put it in the bucket.

who was that guy that scored 20 a game for the orlando magic in their initial season?

i can't remember his name, and chances are you can't either.