Jamal Magloire

Post #1 » by **Spin Move** » Fri Feb 22, 2008 10:43 pm

So not even close compared with pollard he would be a great fit, just relased sign him danny then cassell

theGreatRC · Post #2 » by **theGreatRC** » Fri Feb 22, 2008 10:45 pm

How did this guy become an all-star again?

StephenASmith · Post #3 » by **StephenASmith** » Fri Feb 22, 2008 10:48 pm

The east was horrible for centers the year he made it ^^^.

enzino · Post #4 » by **enzino** » Fri Feb 22, 2008 10:49 pm

he can be the man

Post #5 » by **Spin Move** » Fri Feb 22, 2008 10:50 pm

We need a real backup center if we play the magic or spurs in the playoffs, Magloire is not coming in to start he is coming in to fill a role

Al n' Perk No Layups! · Post #6 » by **Al n' Perk No Layups!** » Fri Feb 22, 2008 10:51 pm

I'm highly in favor of this move. He brings size and bulk. Exactly what we need.

nasbahceltic · Post #7 » by **nasbahceltic** » Fri Feb 22, 2008 10:51 pm

I wish they would've waived Diop instead

Relative Autonomy · Post #8 » by **Relative Autonomy** » Fri Feb 22, 2008 10:59 pm

diop is too young and with too much potential to get traded. i hope DA can snag him this is the quality big man everyone was talking about. nothing amazing but SOLID

ubernathan · Post #9 » by **ubernathan** » Fri Feb 22, 2008 11:03 pm

nasbahceltic wrote:I wish they would've waived Diop instead

I wish they would have waived Ricardo Taversbury instead.

Post #10 » by **canman1971** » Fri Feb 22, 2008 11:03 pm

I think he'd be ok to fill some minutes at the backup C position. Probably as good as you will get.

Prue · Post #11 » by **Prue** » Fri Feb 22, 2008 11:09 pm

StephenASmith wrote:The east was horrible for centers the year he made it ^^^.

He actually played reall well that game... I remember watching it.

Oh and ya let atleast bring him in for a work out...

Rocky5000 · Post #12 » by **Rocky5000** » Fri Feb 22, 2008 11:18 pm

I'd rather have Justin Williams, Magloire is toast.

TheCelticTruth · Post #13 » by **TheCelticTruth** » Fri Feb 22, 2008 11:24 pm

magloire is ok but not great. the problem is he went from being an underpaid overachiever to an overpaid underachiever once he hit the all star season, but before that he was rather impressive for a back up. wasnt he averaging like 2.6 points per shot for two or three years? i think so

ubernathan · Post #14 » by **ubernathan** » Fri Feb 22, 2008 11:25 pm

He'd be an okay pickup if all you want is a big body, sort of a second Pollard.

aboubata · Post #15 » by **aboubata** » Fri Feb 22, 2008 11:36 pm

ubernathan wrote:He'd be an okay pickup if all you want is a big body, sort of a second Pollard.

he is just healthier and we can't take a chance on pollard health when the playoffs are here.

GreenGrizz · Post #16 » by **GreenGrizz** » Fri Feb 22, 2008 11:51 pm

He is what we are looking for. He and Cassell are good enough to help us win the championship.

bceltic55 · Post #17 » by **bceltic55** » Sat Feb 23, 2008 12:20 am

He would be perfect for us. Besides Pollard is always hurt. I am sure that after his experience in NJ he will want to prove his worth.

Datruth345 · Post #18 » by **Datruth345** » Sat Feb 23, 2008 12:56 am

sign me up

GoGoCeltics · Post #19 » by **GoGoCeltics** » Sat Feb 23, 2008 1:09 am

Perfect. Let's get 'im.

bceltic55 · Post #20 » by **bceltic55** » Sat Feb 23, 2008 1:15 am

Not to beat a dead horse but, if you look at career stats vs Perk:
Magloire has better stats in PPG 8.7 vs 4.6, Rebounds 7.3 vs 4.8.

This is not to say I want him instead of Perk, but I would like to see the both of them on the C'c.