ImageImageImageImageImage

Suns v Pistons game

Moderators: Kilroy, Danny Darko, TyCobb

User avatar
milesfides
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 16,012
And1: 1,449
Joined: Nov 09, 2004
Location: Brooklyn, NY

 

Post#41 » by milesfides » Mon Feb 25, 2008 1:55 am

It was a bad loss, but the Suns really lost their composure out there. Nash made some crazy turnovers, stuff I've never seen before.

It's obvious the Suns haven't worked out their offense. It looks ugly out there, and they have trouble just getting a decent shot. Against good defensive teams, they're going to struggle, and the Pistons are a great defensive team.

Now that they're not running and gunning, they look lost, and Nash looks as vulnerable as he did as a Maverick.

I'm a little surprised at how the Suns look like they're trying to play with Shaq on the fly. Did they really think they can just run up and down like usual? Or did they think that Shaq will dominate the halfcourt?
“OH! Caruso parachutes in! You cannot stop him - you can only hope to contain him!” -Kevin Harlan, LAL-GSW 4/4/19
User avatar
Sofa King
RealGM
Posts: 19,352
And1: 3,044
Joined: Jul 27, 2003
Contact:
 

 

Post#42 » by Sofa King » Mon Feb 25, 2008 1:59 am

milesfides wrote:Now that they're not running and gunning, they look lost, and Nash looks as vulnerable as he did as a Maverick.


QFT
User avatar
TommyTheCat
Head Coach
Posts: 6,311
And1: 8
Joined: Jun 07, 2005
Location: oregon

 

Post#43 » by TommyTheCat » Mon Feb 25, 2008 2:47 am

milesfides wrote:I'm a little surprised at how the Suns look like they're trying to play with Shaq on the fly. Did they really think they can just run up and down like usual? Or did they think that Shaq will dominate the halfcourt?


i think that's why everyone was like 'wtf' when the trade went down. shaq doesn't fit what the suns did best and now it's going to take some time to figure out what works..........if they do. the suns offense looks completely disjointed. still time but i'm hoping the suns shot themselves in the foot with the deal
User avatar
snaquille oatmeal
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 16,815
And1: 4,819
Joined: Nov 15, 2005
Location: San Diego
   

 

Post#44 » by snaquille oatmeal » Mon Feb 25, 2008 4:09 am

dcash4 wrote:i'm not exactly sure how the suns looked bad on the offensive end against the lakers scoring 124 points.
is not so much that they were effective enough to score 124, they did not look like themselves doing it. they didn't run and gun.

they played half court with a few fast breaks and that is not the Suns game.

they may have scored that many simply because they were charged up with adrenaline because it was Shaqs first game.

once they settle down and start to play on the road we will see a better picture of what they will be like in the playoffs, but todays game didn't help their cause.
Forum permissions
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot trade for basketball reasons in this forum
You cannot but I can...five rings!
Sedale Threatt
RealGM
Posts: 50,816
And1: 44,828
Joined: Feb 06, 2007
Location: Clearing space in the trophy case.

 

Post#45 » by Sedale Threatt » Mon Feb 25, 2008 4:35 am

Most of the supporters of the trade theorized that Shaq would rebound, outlet and the Suns would just run without him. After all, they argued, you don't need the entire team to run the break.

OK, I guess that's plausible, even though Shaq's never been a particularly skilled outlet passer.

But the even bigger issue was the fact that they traded one of their best finishers/slashers in the process. Outside of Marion, who else do the Suns have that's going to get out and run with Nash besides Stoudemire and Barbosa? The cupboard suddenly looks pretty bare in that department, not to mention the fact that they also lost a capable 3-point shooter as well.

I'm going to need a lot more than three games to make any definitive decisions. But I gave this trade about a 2-1 chance of failing, and I haven't yet seen anything in this brief window to convince me otherwise.
Liqourish
RealGM
Posts: 14,912
And1: 2,245
Joined: Oct 03, 2005
       

 

Post#46 » by Liqourish » Mon Feb 25, 2008 12:34 pm

Iceburg Slim wrote:Funny how the best team Shaq has ever played for is a number 2 seed...:rofl:


Actually with the loss to the Pistons, the suns moved down to the 5th seed. :P
Kilroy
Forum Mod - Lakers
Forum Mod - Lakers
Posts: 21,601
And1: 12,312
Joined: Jul 10, 2006
Location: The Motel 9 in Vegas
       

 

Post#47 » by Kilroy » Mon Feb 25, 2008 4:20 pm

While I hate the Suns, I think it's important to avoid pinning their innefectiveness on offense entirely on the Shaq trade...

You can't take ANYTHING away from the D the Pistons are capable of playing. On any given night they seem capable of playing D at a level or 2 higher than just about any team in the league. Make no mistake, we won't be scoring 130pts on them any time soon.

They also have the abillity to pour on points with the best of them too.

Their only weekness is that they are getting a little used to being on top of the east and sometimes don't seem to bring the intensity every night. But when it's there, they're a very, very hard team to beat.

In fact, if we don't learn how to play some defense before the playoffs, I don't think we have a very good chance against any of the Easts top seeds right now.

Return to Los Angeles Lakers