ImageImageImage

The playoff rotation I want to see

Moderators: bisme37, Froob, Darthlukey, Shak_Celts, Parliament10, canman1971, shackles10, snowman

Fencer reregistered
RealGM
Posts: 41,038
And1: 27,915
Joined: Oct 25, 2006

The playoff rotation I want to see 

Post#1 » by Fencer reregistered » Sun Feb 24, 2008 9:30 am

C Perkins 24/Magloire 15/Garnett 9
PF Garnett 30/Posey 10/Davis 8
SF Pierce 38/Posey 10
SG Allen 38/Allen 10
PG Rondo 24/Cassell 24

Total

Garnett 39
Pierce 38
R. Allen 38
Rondo 24
Cassell 24
Perkins 24
Posey 20
Magloire 15
T. Allen 10
Davis 8
Powe 0 (thanks for the energy and not infrequent good play, and wait 'til next year)
House 0 (thanks for the professionalism and not infrequent good play)
Scalabrine 0 (thanks for the professionalism)
Pollard 0 (wave the M. L. Carr Memorial towel)
Pruitt 0 (wait 'til next year)

At least, that would be the rotation I'd like to see vs. teams with post scorers and slashers. Detroit might be a different matter.
User avatar
Ed Pinkney
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,077
And1: 5,236
Joined: Jun 23, 2007
Location: Australia
 

 

Post#2 » by Ed Pinkney » Sun Feb 24, 2008 10:02 am

:::



Don't think giving one of the best two shooters on the team zero minutes is the greatest idea. And Powe has been outplaying Davis recently, Davis carries on to much when he makes mistakes or gets called for fouls. Powe just gets it done without any fuss. That is a pretty good quality in a playoff series I think.
P2
Banned User
Posts: 4,759
And1: 1
Joined: Dec 18, 2006
Location: Beantown

 

Post#3 » by P2 » Sun Feb 24, 2008 10:36 am

Tony should get more minutes, probably 3 of Ray's and 3 of PP's. I also say no to Posey at PF and Garnett at C. Baby should get the remaining minutes at C, and the rest of the big man minutes should go to Powe.
theGreatRC
RealGM
Posts: 18,524
And1: 4,983
Joined: Oct 12, 2006
Location: California
 

 

Post#4 » by theGreatRC » Sun Feb 24, 2008 12:30 pm

The second unit could actually be a team in the NBA, that's how deep the C's would be if you guys signed Mags and Sam.
Dysfunctional Wolves fan
User avatar
toecutter
Assistant Coach
Posts: 3,954
And1: 1
Joined: Feb 20, 2002

 

Post#5 » by toecutter » Sun Feb 24, 2008 4:25 pm

P2 wrote:Tony should get more minutes, probably 3 of Ray's and 3 of PP's. I also say no to Posey at PF and Garnett at C. Baby should get the remaining minutes at C, and the rest of the big man minutes should go to Powe.


I say give TA minutes at PG. He's done a credible job in the past. He's a good guy to muscle up on smaller players any way.

Powe should definitely get more minutes over Davis. I love them both, but Leon has proven to be the more talented player. No one's earned PT on this team more than Leon. He went from the bottom of the chart, found an opening due to teammate injuries, and then ran with it. He seems to drop 16 and 8 every time he gets minutes. Three words: Free Leon Powe.
keltickings
Sophomore
Posts: 134
And1: 10
Joined: Jul 09, 2006

Re: The playoff rotation I want to see 

Post#6 » by keltickings » Sun Feb 24, 2008 11:13 pm

Fencer reregistered wrote:C Perkins 24/Magloire 15/Garnett 9
PF Garnett 30/Posey 10/Davis 8
SF Pierce 38/Posey 10
SG Allen 38/Allen 10
PG Rondo 24/Cassell 24

Total

Garnett 39
Pierce 38
R. Allen 38
Rondo 24
Cassell 24
Perkins 24
Posey 20
Magloire 15
T. Allen 10
Davis 8
Powe 0 (thanks for the energy and not infrequent good play, and wait 'til next year)
House 0 (thanks for the professionalism and not infrequent good play)
Scalabrine 0 (thanks for the professionalism)
Pollard 0 (wave the M. L. Carr Memorial towel)
Pruitt 0 (wait 'til next year)

At least, that would be the rotation I'd like to see vs. teams with post scorers and slashers. Detroit might be a different matter.




Garnett 36
Pierce 36
R. Allen 30
Rondo 30
Cassell 16
Perkins 20
Posey 20
Magloire 8
T. Allen 12
Davis 12

Powe 8
House 12

Scalabrine 0
Pollard 0
Pruitt 0
User avatar
ParticleMan
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 15,071
And1: 9,074
Joined: Sep 16, 2004
     

 

Post#7 » by ParticleMan » Mon Feb 25, 2008 3:20 am

Powe >>> Magloire.

Magloire absolutely sucks now. Please.

Cassell would be great, but I don't think you can relegate House to the bench that easily. House has carried our second unit offense many times.
I love heinsohn
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 4,290
And1: 0
Joined: Dec 03, 2001
Location: Green 17!
Contact:

 

Post#8 » by I love heinsohn » Mon Feb 25, 2008 4:10 am

KG will play 40+ minutes per game in the playoffs. That may be part of the reason that DA is not super-concerned about finding another big. It is DEFINITELY one of the reasons that his minutes have been limited in the regular season. If Tony keeps rounding into form, then I'd be more inclined to keep Ray and Paul at 38 minutes or less in the playoffs (keep the legs fresh), since the drop off is much less noticeable...
Fencer reregistered
RealGM
Posts: 41,038
And1: 27,915
Joined: Oct 25, 2006

 

Post#9 » by Fencer reregistered » Mon Feb 25, 2008 4:15 am

If Powe or Davis can defend Shaq or Bynum or Ilgauskas or even Dampier, great.

If not, Magloire could have a big role to play.

If it's Kurt Thomas -- yeah, Powe or Davis over Magloire is the first thought. And I'm not sure what shotblockers can do against the Spurs' guards if the big men are scoring threats away from the hoop.
Banned temporarily for, among other sins, being "Extremely Deviant".
DynastyInTheMaking
Rookie
Posts: 1,027
And1: 1
Joined: Oct 19, 2005

 

Post#10 » by DynastyInTheMaking » Mon Feb 25, 2008 4:51 am

Um Powe and particularly House will get minutes no matter what...
I despise fans that cheer on a team from up north or one that resembles a dinosaur. oh wait...
User avatar
toecutter
Assistant Coach
Posts: 3,954
And1: 1
Joined: Feb 20, 2002

 

Post#11 » by toecutter » Mon Feb 25, 2008 5:08 am

Erick Dampier is an offensive threat?

...?

And let's be honest, Shaq will be on limited minutes the rest of his career. Bynum is not all there yet. The only legitimate threat in the playoff is Z . . . who is injury prone.

Quite frankly, if Perkins/Baby/Powe can't stop them, I don't see how in the hell Magloire will.
MoBSTa
Junior
Posts: 263
And1: 0
Joined: Jul 11, 2006
Contact:

 

Post#12 » by MoBSTa » Mon Feb 25, 2008 5:28 am

toecutter wrote:Erick Dampier is an offensive threat?

...?

And let's be honest, Shaq will be on limited minutes the rest of his career. Bynum is not all there yet. The only legitimate threat in the playoff is Z . . . who is injury prone.

Quite frankly, if Perkins/Baby/Powe can't stop them, I don't see how in the hell Magloire will.


Magloire is no softy I live in Kentucky however I hated Tubby smith teams and Magloire was a beast for Tubby, Magloire I think needs a team that can play in the half court set as well as run a little.

He definatly could fit in the Boston picture and he might just be the frame that the Celtics need.

Would Magloire sign for the min. though?
However you can't have to many bigs in the finals and if we must meet Shaq it would be nice to have a extra big to foul him.
Fencer reregistered
RealGM
Posts: 41,038
And1: 27,915
Joined: Oct 25, 2006

 

Post#13 » by Fencer reregistered » Mon Feb 25, 2008 8:09 am

Perkins tonight managed to rack up 4 fouls in under 13 minutes.

Many centers have a lot of foul-heavy nights.

That's one reason you need depth at center.
Banned temporarily for, among other sins, being "Extremely Deviant".
User avatar
tombattor
General Manager
Posts: 8,662
And1: 807
Joined: Nov 11, 2003
       

Re: The playoff rotation I want to see 

Post#14 » by tombattor » Mon Feb 25, 2008 6:00 pm

Fencer reregistered wrote:C Perkins 24/Magloire 15/Garnett 9
PF Garnett 30/Posey 10/Davis 8
SF Pierce 38/Posey 10
SG Allen 38/Allen 10
PG Rondo 24/Cassell 24

Total

Garnett 39
Pierce 38
R. Allen 38
Rondo 24
Cassell 24
Perkins 24
Posey 20
Magloire 15
T. Allen 10
Davis 8
Powe 0 (thanks for the energy and not infrequent good play, and wait 'til next year)
House 0 (thanks for the professionalism and not infrequent good play)
Scalabrine 0 (thanks for the professionalism)
Pollard 0 (wave the M. L. Carr Memorial towel)
Pruitt 0 (wait 'til next year)

At least, that would be the rotation I'd like to see vs. teams with post scorers and slashers. Detroit might be a different matter.

What are you living in 2002? There is no way Cassell is playing 24 minutes (same as Rondo) and Powe, House and Pollard are not playing at all.
User avatar
rambo_ortega
Lead Assistant
Posts: 4,514
And1: 22
Joined: Jan 22, 2004

 

Post#15 » by rambo_ortega » Tue Feb 26, 2008 2:14 pm

i agree with the rotation except that i would want more minutes for tony and distribute minutes between big baby and powe too.
Image

Return to Boston Celtics