ImageImage

Outlaw's Start @ SF

Moderators: DeBlazerRiddem, Moonbeam

Butter
General Manager
Posts: 8,728
And1: 384
Joined: Aug 14, 2002
Location: Youth movement, here we come
 

Outlaw's Start @ SF 

Post#1 » by Butter » Wed Feb 27, 2008 5:08 pm

I watched most of that game yesterday, and I thought Travis did a pretty good job at SF. I'd still really like to see him dramatically improve his ball handling, but I thought he looked effective.

The biggest knock on Travis @ the 3 has been his ability to guard smaller, quicker players, but last night I thought he did a decent job on Kobe.
User avatar
b_roy7
Veteran
Posts: 2,908
And1: 0
Joined: May 11, 2007
Contact:

 

Post#2 » by b_roy7 » Wed Feb 27, 2008 5:19 pm

I agree, him being as athletic as he is helped. If he continues playing well there, I could really see him staying there and Martell going to the bench.
Goldbum
Analyst
Posts: 3,302
And1: 651
Joined: Jul 12, 2001
Location: Salt Lake City, Utah
     

 

Post#3 » by Goldbum » Wed Feb 27, 2008 5:47 pm

I agree If Outlaw is our starting SF, then Channing will see alot more of our PF minutes. Webster will see more minutes at SG and maybe we won't be outsized all the time.
From Portland to Reno to Vegas to LA to SLC and on to HotLanta. Winning at life. Too Blessed to be Stressed
ebott
Head Coach
Posts: 6,902
And1: 150
Joined: Jun 26, 2001
Location: Portland, Oregon
 

 

Post#4 » by ebott » Wed Feb 27, 2008 5:47 pm

I concur. I was very happy with Outlaw at the 3. I see the future. It's a front line of Oden, Aldridge and Outlaw and it is beautiful.
Green Apple wrote:Portland fans are and have been some of the great citizens of basketball, they are a sea of basketball knowledge and passion.
User avatar
swede
Assistant Coach
Posts: 3,771
And1: 6
Joined: Oct 18, 2005
Location: Z-Bo: Cuz the NBA aint got Roger Goodell.

 

Post#5 » by swede » Wed Feb 27, 2008 5:48 pm

If he learns to pass more then no problem from me..
Cyborg21 wrote:Screw you Batum, throwing us under the bus, I hope we destroy these scum next year.
Wizenheimer
RealGM
Posts: 36,215
And1: 7,978
Joined: May 28, 2007

 

Post#6 » by Wizenheimer » Wed Feb 27, 2008 5:53 pm

I think Outlaw can play SF, and his ball-handling ability brings a dimension that Webster and Jones don't have.

Travis still needs to work on his passing and not jacking up so many difficult shots. he also needs to work on just catching and shooting, instead of a tendency to dribble.

Perhaps, if portland decides he is the best bet at SF, a summer of working him in that position will help him a lot.
Billy
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 12,623
And1: 161
Joined: Aug 14, 2001
 

 

Post#7 » by Billy » Wed Feb 27, 2008 6:54 pm

I agree with everything that's been said. Outlaw looked great. I think it's the only start in my memory (other than the throw away games at the end of the past two years) that he's excelled in. His ability to create his own shot may only be matched by Roy on this team.

That said, if Portland goes with Outlaw at SF I don't see a future for Martell here. Unlike Outlaw, I don't see Martell ever being capable of the energizer roll that Travis has played off the bench. I still would want to see one more full season of Webster though before passing judgment.
Wizenheimer
RealGM
Posts: 36,215
And1: 7,978
Joined: May 28, 2007

 

Post#8 » by Wizenheimer » Wed Feb 27, 2008 7:21 pm

Billy wrote:I agree with everything that's been said. Outlaw looked great. I think it's the only start in my memory (other than the throw away games at the end of the past two years) that he's excelled in. His ability to create his own shot may only be matched by Roy on this team.

That said, if Portland goes with Outlaw at SF I don't see a future for Martell here. Unlike Outlaw, I don't see Martell ever being capable of the energizer roll that Travis has played off the bench. I still would want to see one more full season of Webster though before passing judgment.


remember...if martell doesn't have his contract extended this summer, his cap-hold entering the 2009 off-season will be 300% of his salary...about 11.3 million dollars.

puts a big crimp on any cap-space plans
Billy
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 12,623
And1: 161
Joined: Aug 14, 2001
 

 

Post#9 » by Billy » Wed Feb 27, 2008 7:25 pm

Wizenheimer wrote:-= original quote snipped =-



remember...if martell doesn't have his contract extended this summer, his cap-hold entering the 2009 off-season will be 300% of his salary...about 11.3 million dollars.

puts a big crimp on any cap-space plans


Interesting. Although, couldn't Portland choose to resign him in the summer and thus adjust his cap number depending upon those numbers? Also I suppose Portland could deal him.

That certainly does change things.
User avatar
Mr Odd
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 12,081
And1: 8
Joined: Jul 08, 2003

 

Post#10 » by Mr Odd » Wed Feb 27, 2008 7:28 pm

swede wrote:If he learns to pass more then no problem from me..


Pass to whom?? Other then LMA theres
really no other scorer playing right now.
Image
bing'o-bang'o-bong'o-baby!!
Wizenheimer
RealGM
Posts: 36,215
And1: 7,978
Joined: May 28, 2007

 

Post#11 » by Wizenheimer » Wed Feb 27, 2008 9:46 pm

Billy wrote:-= original quote snipped =-



Interesting. Although, couldn't Portland choose to resign him in the summer and thus adjust his cap number depending upon those numbers? Also I suppose Portland could deal him.

That certainly does change things.


technically, I don't think the blazers are supposed to 'negotiate' till after the free agent signing period begins sometime in mid-july. They are required to offer the QO by June 30, otherwise Martell becomes UFA instead of RFA. He'd still count against the cap though, unless portland renounced the bird rights to him.

So if portland is confident they can ink him to a new contract immediately after the signing period begins, then I suppose they could take that risk.

But there is nothing compelling martell to sign right away. He may want to test the FA market to try and gauge what his value is. And teams will tend to go after the UFA's first and the RFA's afterwards. So Martell's FA status could last the majority of the summer, holding any cap-space options portland was planning on hostage.
Tim Lehrbach
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 26,055
And1: 4,313
Joined: Jul 29, 2001
   

 

Post#12 » by Tim Lehrbach » Wed Feb 27, 2008 10:13 pm

Martell would be renounced if the Blazers wanted to sign somebody better. Or, if he's too good to lose for nothing (unlikely), then who cares about cap space?
Clipsz 4 Life
January 20, 2002-May 17, 2006
Saxon
February 20, 2001-August 9, 2007
User avatar
SoHo
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,570
And1: 0
Joined: May 28, 2007

 

Post#13 » by SoHo » Wed Feb 27, 2008 10:46 pm

Travis still needs to work on his passing and not jacking up so many difficult shots. he also needs to work on just catching and shooting, instead of a tendency to dribble.

Perhaps, if portland decides he is the best bet at SF, a summer of working him in that position will help him a lot.


I wholeheartedly agree. I think his biggest problem is really fitting into the offense which is a blessing and a curse. He's capable of taking his man and elevating to get a shot off so I feel like he settles for doing that rather than making an extra pass.

Training camp/the beginning of next season will tell a lot. Oden will change how we play and Outlaw will have to fit into that new system, a system which probably benefits Martell more than Travis.
Spykes
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 25,738
And1: 16
Joined: Mar 15, 2004
Location: Paddy's Pub

 

Post#14 » by Spykes » Wed Feb 27, 2008 10:53 pm

Outlaw's passing is what really stood out to me from last night. I was throughly impressed with some of the passes he made when he'd get doubled. There were times when he'd drive to the hoop and get stuck in between a few defenders and he was able to kick it out to the open man behind the arch. It wasn't the most crisp pass ever, but it got to who he intended, that alone was impressive for Outlaw imo.

I definitely hope Nate keeps Travis at SF for a few more games, even after Roy gets back.
Wizenheimer
RealGM
Posts: 36,215
And1: 7,978
Joined: May 28, 2007

 

Post#15 » by Wizenheimer » Wed Feb 27, 2008 11:11 pm

Tim Lehrbach wrote:Martell would be renounced if the Blazers wanted to sign somebody better. Or, if he's too good to lose for nothing (unlikely), then who cares about cap space?


I'm not a big fan of the cap-space thingy...

however, if it could be determined by the end of this season that Martell wasn't part of portland's future, then Martell could at the least be traded this summer for something...like moving up 2 or 3 places in the draft order

that would seem to be a better alternative to just letting him walk a year later.
User avatar
Pattycakes
General Manager
Posts: 8,546
And1: 2,149
Joined: Nov 01, 2005
Contact:
     

 

Post#16 » by Pattycakes » Thu Feb 28, 2008 2:10 am

Mr Odd wrote:-= original quote snipped =-



Pass to whom?? Other then LMA theres
really no other scorer playing right now.


QFT.
User avatar
mojomarc
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 16,838
And1: 999
Joined: Jun 01, 2004
Location: Funkytown

 

Post#17 » by mojomarc » Thu Feb 28, 2008 4:17 am

Mr Odd wrote:-= original quote snipped =-



Pass to whom?? Other then LMA theres
really no other scorer playing right now.


That's the excuse we used for Randolph last year, and it turned out to be nothing but an excuse and not a real reason.

Return to Portland Trail Blazers