why didnt utah go after garnett?

Moderators: bwgood77, zimpy27, infinite11285, Clav, Domejandro, ken6199, bisme37, Dirk, KingDavid, cupcakesnake

thaAteam
Banned User
Posts: 2,027
And1: 2
Joined: Feb 21, 2007

why didnt utah go after garnett? 

Post#1 » by thaAteam » Thu Feb 28, 2008 2:27 am

I watch the utah team play and they are a very solid team except very weak interior defense will okur and boozer, i think they could have given up booer and fillers for kg and could have been a contender every year, him and okur compliment eachother great
User avatar
Vindicater
General Manager
Posts: 7,948
And1: 423
Joined: Apr 11, 2004

 

Post#2 » by Vindicater » Thu Feb 28, 2008 2:34 am

The Wolves would have demanded Williams.
"That's why the last two years weren't guaranteed," Walsh said. "Either way, he knew it could have happened either way."
User avatar
High 5
RealGM
Posts: 15,657
And1: 2,185
Joined: Apr 21, 2006

 

Post#3 » by High 5 » Thu Feb 28, 2008 2:37 am

Celtics gave Minnesota the best trade they were going to get.
Taiwan Killa
Banned User
Posts: 1,027
And1: 0
Joined: Jul 31, 2007

 

Post#4 » by Taiwan Killa » Thu Feb 28, 2008 2:49 am

High 5 wrote:Celtics gave Minnesota the best trade they were going to get.

Nope Lakers were giving up

Bynum
Odom
Farmar
Kwame's 9 mil expiring
Picks.
User avatar
High 5
RealGM
Posts: 15,657
And1: 2,185
Joined: Apr 21, 2006

 

Post#5 » by High 5 » Thu Feb 28, 2008 2:50 am

Taiwan Killa wrote:-= original quote snipped =-


Nope Lakers were giving up

Bynum
Odom
Farmar
Kwame's 9 mil expiring
Picks.


Where did you read that? That trade is (Please Use More Appropriate Word) for the Lakers. I seriously doubt they would have ever done that.
User avatar
KB20
Head Coach
Posts: 6,196
And1: 9
Joined: Nov 27, 2004
       

 

Post#6 » by KB20 » Thu Feb 28, 2008 2:56 am

High 5 wrote:-= original quote snipped =-



Where did you read that? That trade is (Please Use More Appropriate Word) for the Lakers. I seriously doubt they would have ever done that.


At the time that was the offer and most Laker fans supported it, looking back, everything worked for the best. Bynum and Farmar broke out, Kwame and the picks were swapped for Pau, and Lamar found a perfect role on the team.
Image
GreenWithEnvy
Analyst
Posts: 3,529
And1: 163
Joined: Aug 18, 2004
Location: Philly via Cali

 

Post#7 » by GreenWithEnvy » Thu Feb 28, 2008 3:02 am

Im pretty sure the deal was Lamar, Kwame and picks which ISN"T the best deal. I dunno where ur gettin this Bynum, Kwame, Lamar, Farmar and picks ****. Some people on REALGM posted Bynum, Kwame and Lamar but thats as far as it went. Boston gave Minny THE BEST deal.
Willie Green Is The Man!
User avatar
Heat3
RealGM
Posts: 20,396
And1: 16,169
Joined: May 26, 2006
Location: Where all the children are above average.
Contact:
   

 

Post#8 » by Heat3 » Thu Feb 28, 2008 3:28 am

McHale never played for the Jazz did he?
Pat Riley wrote:There are only two options regarding commitment. You're either IN or you're OUT. There is no such thing as life in-between.

James Johnson wrote:The culture is REAL.

Image
User avatar
greenbeans
RealGM
Posts: 60,140
And1: 14,166
Joined: Sep 14, 2007
     

 

Post#9 » by greenbeans » Thu Feb 28, 2008 3:31 am

the Wolves wanted no part of Odoms contract, they ARE trying to rebuild after all. and Big Al>Bynum, sorry lala fans
That Nicka
Banned User
Posts: 15,350
And1: 34
Joined: Jun 28, 2005
Location: USC

 

Post#10 » by That Nicka » Thu Feb 28, 2008 3:42 am

Taiwan Killa wrote:-= original quote snipped =-


Nope Lakers were giving up

Bynum
Odom
Farmar
Kwame's 9 mil expiring
Picks.


bs

greenbeans wrote:the Wolves wanted no part of Odoms contract, they ARE trying to rebuild after all. and Big Al>Bynum, sorry lala fans


fact
User avatar
Flash3
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 52,635
And1: 403
Joined: Oct 21, 2004
Location: L-I-M-R

 

Post#11 » by Flash3 » Thu Feb 28, 2008 3:46 am

Do we really need these sort of threads?
Mars wrote:You can't stop the asterisk... you can only hope to contain it.

Return to The General Board