Kwame Brown or Darko Milicic?

DarkoMilicic · Post #1 » by **DarkoMilicic** » Sun Mar 2, 2008 5:19 am

Pick...

Hunter · Post #2 » by **Hunter** » Sun Mar 2, 2008 10:34 am

DarkoMilicic wrote:Pick...

Do I have to?

Darko, unlike Kwame, has actually shown some talent. I'm just not sure if that is a positive or a negative. If he actually gave a crap he'd be a damn solid starter.

BruceO · Post #3 » by **BruceO** » Sun Mar 2, 2008 1:34 pm

more importantly who would win in a fight, wolverine or spiderman

actually truth be told, Darko would be my pick. Kwame has already proved he cant be the man, where Darko still has to prove that he cant be the man. Both are good post defenders, I'd give darko a few years and he can be a good defensive center

stash · Post #4 » by **stash** » Sun Mar 2, 2008 6:08 pm

Gotta go with Darko, just based on the fact that he is 3 years younger. Kwame has been around longer, therefor its unlikely now that he will all of a sudden figure it out, Darko still has a chance, especially because he spent the first three years of his career glued to the bench in Detroit.

Post #5 » by **dockingsched** » Sun Mar 2, 2008 6:40 pm

mentioning potential when it comes to these two is a bad way for choosing. at this point, they are what they are, make a choice off of that.

tracey_nice · Post #6 » by **tracey_nice** » Sun Mar 2, 2008 7:17 pm

Kwame Brown or an elementary student

That Nicka · Post #7 » by **That Nicka** » Sun Mar 2, 2008 7:29 pm

Or

risktaker91 · Post #8 » by **risktaker91** » Sun Mar 2, 2008 9:48 pm

Darko. I can't stand Cua-May Brown.

PaKwAn · Post #9 » by **PaKwAn** » Mon Mar 3, 2008 12:01 am

wow this is a tough question......

tracey_nice · Post #10 » by **tracey_nice** » Mon Mar 3, 2008 12:15 am

To settle this I decided to answer the general question
Kwame Brown Vs X. Kwame Brown is an asymptote of bad and you can only approach it, you can not exceed it. Therefore, the question Kwame Brown Vs X will result in X. No matter how bad X is the badness is only approaching the standard that Kwame Brown has set. So whomever is inserted as X; Kwame Brown will always be the superior worst player.

Cigamodnalro · Post #11 » by **Cigamodnalro** » Mon Mar 3, 2008 12:20 am

tracey_nice wrote:To settle this I decided to answer the general question
Kwame Brown Vs X. Kwame Brown is an asymptote of bad and you can only approach it, you can not exceed it. Therefore, the question Kwame Brown Vs X will result in X. No matter how bad X is the badness is only approaching the standard that Kwame Brown has set. So whomever is inserted as X; Kwame Brown will always be the superior worst player.

GhostsOfGil · Post #12 » by **GhostsOfGil** » Mon Mar 3, 2008 12:20 am

good comparison. both serious busts with limited offense and slightly above defense

tranjSAIC · Post #13 » by **tranjSAIC** » Mon Mar 3, 2008 3:12 am

zaRdsAndZeRos wrote:good comparison. both serious busts with limited offense and slightly above defense

I've watched Darko EVERY game he was with the Magic, I gotta disagree with the no offense thing. I think he has alot of moves and skills on the offensive end, I think his problem is he just can't do it in a game consistently.

Jemini80 · Post #14 » by **Jemini80** » Mon Mar 3, 2008 3:22 am

Darko will eventually average 10 and 10 in one of the next 7 years, Kwame has no chance at that. I pick Darko.