Celtics Vs. Lakers

Moderators: Clyde Frazier, Doctor MJ, trex_8063, penbeast0, PaulieWal

User avatar
tracey_nice
Analyst
Posts: 3,531
And1: 274
Joined: Jan 08, 2008
Location: PAUUSE

 

Post#21 » by tracey_nice » Mon Mar 3, 2008 10:14 pm

farzi wrote:-= original quote snipped =-



One line? Check
No argument for or against? Check
Siding with the Lakers? Check

Classic Hermes? Check

LOL
User avatar
Ortho Stice
Veteran
Posts: 2,889
And1: 76
Joined: Mar 11, 2003

 

Post#22 » by Ortho Stice » Mon Mar 3, 2008 10:25 pm

Celtics in four. They already beat them pretty easily twice this season. Also, if Bynum/Gasol/Odom all start together, Garnett would be able to score at will on Gasol and Pierce would score at will on Odom. It would have to be the Lakers bench that would win it for them but the Celtics' bench is pretty solid now and plus the the rotations would be tightened.
User avatar
farzi
RealGM
Posts: 12,485
And1: 5
Joined: Dec 20, 2007

 

Post#23 » by farzi » Mon Mar 3, 2008 10:28 pm

idrinkrootbeer wrote:Celtics in four. They already beat them pretty easily twice this season. Also, if Bynum/Gasol/Odom all start together, Garnett would be able to score at will on Gasol and Pierce would score at will on Odom. It would have to be the Lakers bench that would win it for them but the Celtics' bench is pretty solid now and plus the the rotations would be tightened.


I wouldn't take it that far. The Lakers are legit, much to my chagrin. I still think Boston would win, but It'd be in 6

Return to Player Comparisons