Would you take Manu Ginobili over Paul Pierce?

Moderators: Clyde Frazier, Doctor MJ, trex_8063, penbeast0, PaulieWal

Post Reply

Manu Ginobili vs Paul Pierce, which player would you rather have?

Manu Ginobili
46
58%
Paul Pierce
33
42%
 
Total votes: 79
The_Believer
Pro Prospect
Posts: 810
And1: 0
Joined: May 20, 2007
Location: The Bay

 

Post#61 » by The_Believer » Fri Mar 7, 2008 7:42 pm

Pierce is the only player who is elite at slashing, mid-range shooting, and 3 ball shooting. If I were my team (the Warriors) I'd rather have Truth than Manu.
Top
Hard2dhole
Rookie
Posts: 1,226
And1: 0
Joined: Jun 19, 2007

 

Post#62 » by Hard2dhole » Sat Mar 8, 2008 2:41 am

miller31time wrote:If I need a 1st option, I take Pierce. If I need a 2nd option player, I take Ginobili.

+1 too bad i had to read 4 pages to find it.
Top
big123
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,892
And1: 0
Joined: Feb 03, 2008
Contact:
Contact big123

 

Post#63 » by big123 » Sat Mar 8, 2008 12:37 pm

I can see it being close, but when I see that Manu is an overwhelming favorite, it's not realistic and becomes a joke to me.
Top
DarkAzcura
General Manager
Posts: 8,876
And1: 7,337
Joined: Apr 21, 2006

 

Post#64 » by DarkAzcura » Sat Mar 8, 2008 5:39 pm

farzi wrote:-= original quote snipped =-



He carried them to the second worst record int he league last year...


20-27 with Pierce (43% winning percentage...this includes those 7-8 games Jefferson was benched and hurt)
4-31 without Pierce (11% winning percentage)

That team would have been a .500 team if Pierce played all year (he got hurt every time the Celtics hit a 4-5 game winning streak).
Top
Post Reply

Return to Player Comparisons

 

 

More Football News »