LL Cool Scott wrote:#2 - If the constant criticism of Knight by fans and writers and tv and radio hosts gets him canned, I'm all for it.
(1) It doesn't seem to be getting him canned.
(2) When the owners speak publicly, they seem either ignorant or derisive of the fans/writers complaints.
So for you to say that this constant stream of vitriol is worth it is fallacious, in the fact that it is not working. It hasn't worked for 3.5 years. If he (and Woodson) is released at the end of his contract (since that would seem to be what is likely to happen, just as they did with Stotts), it will not be because of anything any of us have or will say.
So if it isn't working, then how is it worth it?
And if being a Hawks fan, to you, is like being kicked in the nuts, then why don't you stop being a Hawks fan, and go find some other team that needs ultra-negative fans to "support" it? (You know, I lived in Philly for a time, and am still a Phillies and Eagles fan, and still find these Hawks fans to be some of the most negative around.)