ImageImageImage

Which young LSU player has the most upside potential?

Moderators: bisme37, Froob, Darthlukey, Shak_Celts, Parliament10, canman1971, shackles10, snowman

User avatar
campybatman
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,100
And1: 185
Joined: Apr 19, 2007

Which young LSU player has the most upside potential? 

Post#1 » by campybatman » Sat Mar 8, 2008 12:25 am

Perhaps, Davis (he'll need to lower his weight) could start for a team eventually. It'll probably come down to which of these players will get the best opportunity down the road. Maturity might be the only thing holding Thomas back. While the other two play behind All-Star power forwards. Interestingly, with the exception of maybe Thomas, the other two are undersized for power forward. I think Thomas could be somewhat taller than them. Could affect Bass and Davis when rebounding the ball and for certain defensive assignments. But, I believe Bass and Thomas at least possess long arms but Davis doesn't. Still, for anyone of them, their intangibles might help them exceed their limitations.

Brandon Bass (second round 2005)
Tyrus Thomas (first round 2006)
Glen Davis (second round 2007)
User avatar
Bleeding Green
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 24,178
And1: 13,875
Joined: Feb 28, 2005
Location: Atlantic Champs OMG OMG OMG!

 

Post#2 » by Bleeding Green » Sat Mar 8, 2008 12:36 am

Tyrus Thomas, easily. The question is will he realize his potential or be a relative waste?
Manocad wrote:I have an engineering degree, an exceptionally high IQ, and can point to the exact location/area of any country on an unlabeled globe.
User avatar
Datruth345
Assistant Coach
Posts: 3,903
And1: 442
Joined: Nov 25, 2005
 

 

Post#3 » by Datruth345 » Sat Mar 8, 2008 1:40 am

Paul Millsap went to Louisiana Tech not LSU
"...That, Mr. James, is etched in stone.” - Bill Russell
User avatar
SonicYouth34
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,575
And1: 0
Joined: Feb 25, 2008
Contact:

 

Post#4 » by SonicYouth34 » Sat Mar 8, 2008 2:08 am

Bleeding Green wrote:Tyrus Thomas, easily. The question is will he realize his potential or be a relative waste?


I do hope BBD is better though, love that kid
humblebum
Banned User
Posts: 11,727
And1: 1,755
Joined: Jan 20, 2005

 

Post#5 » by humblebum » Sat Mar 8, 2008 2:26 am

If the question is: which LSU alumni will have the better NBA career among Tyrus Thomas, Glen Davis, and Brandon Bass than I'd have to say it's gotta be Glen Davis. He has the best mix of size, talent, character, basketball IQ, and work ethic. I could easily see Glen Davis having a David West-esque rise to All-Star status when he puts it all together. It sounds crazy now but I just feel like Davis has too many tools in the toolbox not to become a bigtime NBA player.
User avatar
TheCelticTruth
Analyst
Posts: 3,092
And1: 0
Joined: Jul 04, 2006
Location: You Can't Handle the Truth, the real city of champions, again.

 

Post#6 » by TheCelticTruth » Sat Mar 8, 2008 2:27 am

tyrus thomas easily has the most upside because of his speed and hops...i think davis and bass work harder though

and millsap...yeah not lsu
Image

Sig by twolves4ever
Boston-Syracuse-North Carolina, Screw Duke and BC
"ubuntu"
keltickings
Sophomore
Posts: 134
And1: 10
Joined: Jul 09, 2006

 

Post#7 » by keltickings » Sat Mar 8, 2008 3:27 am

Bleeding Green wrote:Tyrus Thomas, easily. The question is will he realize his potential or be a relative waste?


Couldn't have said it better.
DynastyInTheMaking
Rookie
Posts: 1,027
And1: 1
Joined: Oct 19, 2005

 

Post#8 » by DynastyInTheMaking » Sat Mar 8, 2008 10:41 am

Anthony Randolph.
I despise fans that cheer on a team from up north or one that resembles a dinosaur. oh wait...
User avatar
The_Pope
Junior
Posts: 306
And1: 3
Joined: May 20, 2007
Location: England

 

Post#9 » by The_Pope » Sat Mar 8, 2008 12:35 pm

DynastyInTheMaking wrote:Anthony Randolph.

Seen. This kid will easily be better than Davis or Thomas.
EdSkae
Senior
Posts: 558
And1: 0
Joined: Feb 18, 2006

 

Post#10 » by EdSkae » Sat Mar 8, 2008 1:58 pm

Bleeding Green wrote:Tyrus Thomas, easily. The question is will he realize his potential or be a relative waste?


Thomas is the most athletic. Davis is the more skilled basketball player.
I'll say Davis will have the better career. There is a good chance Thomas will never see the floor and understand the game the way Davis does right now.
User avatar
tlee324
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 20,009
And1: 8,571
Joined: Jun 29, 2003
Location: Celtic Nation
       

 

Post#11 » by tlee324 » Sat Mar 8, 2008 2:51 pm

I think it depends on where you feel "upside" really consists of. If you think it's about athleticism, and physical attributes like height and length, then you would likely go with Thomas, hoping the skills follow through in terms of being able to shoot the ball, find open players effectively, developing low-post moves, etc. I think the people in this situation have cornered the "upside" label because you can't teach those physical and athletic attributes, but you can learn the aspects of the game.

A player like Glen Davis may have more "BBIQ" and have better post moves or be able to find open players better, and he can definitely get better in those areas as well, giving him some respectable claim to having "upside", but he will never be able to gain the athleticism and physical attributes that a player like Tyrus Thomas has.

Based on that, I feel Thomas would be seen by more as the player with the most upside.
Image
User avatar
campybatman
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,100
And1: 185
Joined: Apr 19, 2007

 

Post#12 » by campybatman » Sat Mar 8, 2008 8:39 pm

I think players with lesser talent have to work harder and they do so to last in the league. Those having a lot of talent slack at times depending on their personality make up and overall attitude and work ethic or lack there of.

Thomas' worst case scenario is Stromile Swift or Darius Miles.

Would be something if Davis could manage his body to an ideal weight like Carlos Boozer.
User avatar
cisco
Veteran
Posts: 2,738
And1: 48
Joined: Nov 14, 2005

 

Post#13 » by cisco » Sun Mar 9, 2008 3:11 pm

bonsaiflipflops wrote:I think players with lesser talent have to work harder and they do so to last in the league. Those having a lot of talent slack at times depending on their personality make up and overall attitude and work ethic or lack there of.

Thomas' worst case scenario is Stromile Swift or Darius Miles.

Would be something if Davis could manage his body to an ideal weight like Carlos Boozer.


Or like our very own, Kendrick Perkins.
User avatar
sonny
RealGM
Posts: 17,968
And1: 271
Joined: Nov 16, 2002
Location: Chicago

 

Post#14 » by sonny » Sun Mar 9, 2008 9:44 pm

Bleeding Green wrote:Tyrus Thomas, easily. The question is will he realize his potential or be a relative waste?


Put Tyrus on a team that won't play him at a position he can't play (sf) won't name him starter on 2 occasions, have him play well and then bench him for an inferior player and he'll blossom.
User avatar
campybatman
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,100
And1: 185
Joined: Apr 19, 2007

 

Post#15 » by campybatman » Mon Mar 10, 2008 3:52 pm

Conditioning were concerns for both Jefferson and Perkins so Davis isn't alone. But, hopefully Davis can find a way to trim his weight. Fans might not have seen the best of his game yet. Losing weight tends too affect your game for the better. I hope so because I don't like his "Big Baby" nickname or hearing the tired wisecracks or comments by Heinsohn or whomever about his weight. He's a young player and not an overweight veteran.

Return to Boston Celtics