Dream Pairing
Moderators: Clyde Frazier, Doctor MJ, trex_8063, penbeast0, PaulieWal
- WadeKnicks2010
- Lead Assistant
- Posts: 4,871
- And1: 2
- Joined: Jan 14, 2008
- Location: NYC
LBJ and Kobe combined are better talentwise but MJ and Pippen is the winning team. Pippen is a better complementary player than LeBron ever will be. LeBron is better, but he needs to be a first option to be at his most effective. MJ and Pippen. Go with the guys who won rings with Luc Longley at center.
- kooldude
- Lead Assistant
- Posts: 4,823
- And1: 78
- Joined: Jul 08, 2007
WadeKnicks2010 wrote:LBJ and Kobe combined are better talentwise but MJ and Pippen is the winning team. Pippen is a better complementary player than LeBron ever will be. LeBron is better, but he needs to be a first option to be at his most effective. MJ and Pippen. Go with the guys who won rings with Luc Longley at center.
Why should Lebron be the 2nd option? Like you said, Lebron is best effective as the 1st option and Kobe has proven to be tremendous 2nd option.
Warspite wrote:I still would take Mitch (Richmond) over just about any SG playing today. His peak is better than 2011 Kobe and with 90s rules hes better than Wade.
Jordan23Forever wrote:People are delusional.
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 60,467
- And1: 5,348
- Joined: Jul 12, 2006
- Location: HCA (Homecourt Advantage)
kooldude wrote:-= original quote snipped =-
Why should Lebron be the 2nd option? Like you said, Lebron is best effective as the 1st option and Kobe has proven to be tremendous 2nd option.
I think Lebron needs to be the first option. The guy with the higher PER as the superstar should be the guy who gets the most shots.

"Talent wins games, but teamwork and intelligence wins championships."
- Michael Jordan
- kooldude
- Lead Assistant
- Posts: 4,823
- And1: 78
- Joined: Jul 08, 2007
zaRdsAndZeRos wrote:that would be the most entertaining 2 v 2 EVER. id have money on jordan and pippen. dont forget how good pippens d was.
do you really think Pippen could guard Lebron? Scottie never faced a guy like Lebron before.
Warspite wrote:I still would take Mitch (Richmond) over just about any SG playing today. His peak is better than 2011 Kobe and with 90s rules hes better than Wade.
Jordan23Forever wrote:People are delusional.
- kooldude
- Lead Assistant
- Posts: 4,823
- And1: 78
- Joined: Jul 08, 2007
zaRdsAndZeRos wrote:-= original quote snipped =-
no of course not but pippen would be able to contain him better then anyone else has.
I agree but in 2on2, Lebron would abuse Pippen
Warspite wrote:I still would take Mitch (Richmond) over just about any SG playing today. His peak is better than 2011 Kobe and with 90s rules hes better than Wade.
Jordan23Forever wrote:People are delusional.
-
- Banned User
- Posts: 1,758
- And1: 8
- Joined: Jul 05, 2006
- Cigamodnalro
- RealGM
- Posts: 12,371
- And1: 66
- Joined: Apr 10, 2006
- Location: Political Asylum
Chris Paul and Dwight Howard
https://twitter.com/cigamodnalro
“A house pulled down is half rebuilt” - Ancient Proverb
"There's beauty in the breakdown" - Frou Frou
"We're going to turn this team around 360 degrees" - Jason Kidd
“A house pulled down is half rebuilt” - Ancient Proverb
"There's beauty in the breakdown" - Frou Frou
"We're going to turn this team around 360 degrees" - Jason Kidd
-
- Lead Assistant
- Posts: 4,744
- And1: 1,206
- Joined: Jan 17, 2005
Phil Jackson wrote:I would pick Kobe Bryant and LeBronze James over those other guys even when they were still young.
I think you're just too young.
Kobe's talent does not compare to Jordan's. Jordan was simply unguardable on offense. He would stop Kobe on defense. LeBron would be able to beat Pippen on both ends. But the gap between Jordan and Kobe is a lot wider.