Jordan, Duncan and Russel Vs Bryant, Garnett and Chamberlain

Moderators: Clyde Frazier, Doctor MJ, trex_8063, penbeast0, PaulieWal

Which team will you take?

Team 1
31
78%
Team 2
9
23%
 
Total votes: 40

User avatar
EiRON
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,656
And1: 1
Joined: Nov 24, 2006
Location: Los Angeles Lakers Board
Contact:

Jordan, Duncan and Russel Vs Bryant, Garnett and Chamberlain 

Post#1 » by EiRON » Sat Mar 8, 2008 5:30 pm

Which team will you take?


Team 1

Michael Jordan
Tim Duncan
Bill Russel



VS


Team 2

Kobe Bryant
Kevin Garnett
Wilt Chamberlain
User avatar
kooldude
Lead Assistant
Posts: 4,823
And1: 78
Joined: Jul 08, 2007

 

Post#2 » by kooldude » Sat Mar 8, 2008 5:37 pm

team 2 for me
Warspite wrote:I still would take Mitch (Richmond) over just about any SG playing today. His peak is better than 2011 Kobe and with 90s rules hes better than Wade.


Jordan23Forever wrote:People are delusional.
Phil Jackson
Banned User
Posts: 1,758
And1: 8
Joined: Jul 05, 2006

 

Post#3 » by Phil Jackson » Sat Mar 8, 2008 6:16 pm

Team 2 will win
User avatar
mudyez
Analyst
Posts: 3,123
And1: 3
Joined: Mar 18, 2004
Location: parts unknown

 

Post#4 » by mudyez » Sat Mar 8, 2008 6:23 pm

just my opinion:

Bill>Wilt (I know most of you prefer Wilt, but I love Bill for his play)
Tim>KG (Tim is the best on his position all time...KG 3rd max)
MJ>Kobe (dont want to get into that again)
Image
User avatar
kooldude
Lead Assistant
Posts: 4,823
And1: 78
Joined: Jul 08, 2007

 

Post#5 » by kooldude » Sat Mar 8, 2008 7:16 pm

mudyez wrote:just my opinion:

Bill>Wilt (I know most of you prefer Wilt, but I love Bill for his play)
Tim>KG (Tim is the best on his position all time...KG 3rd max)
MJ>Kobe (dont want to get into that again)


IMO

Wilt was better than Russell at his play, when Wilt settled for Russell's role. Even Russell said so himself. And then, there's the most dominant offensive force part of Wilt that just ends that debate.

Tim is the best all time at center? That is his position.
http://www.82games.com/0708/07SAS19C.HTM

Agreed on the MJ>Kobe obviously. :)
Warspite wrote:I still would take Mitch (Richmond) over just about any SG playing today. His peak is better than 2011 Kobe and with 90s rules hes better than Wade.


Jordan23Forever wrote:People are delusional.
User avatar
mudyez
Analyst
Posts: 3,123
And1: 3
Joined: Mar 18, 2004
Location: parts unknown

 

Post#6 » by mudyez » Sat Mar 8, 2008 7:38 pm

kooldude wrote:-= original quote snipped =-



IMO

Wilt was better than Russell at his play, when Wilt settled for Russell's role. Even Russell said so himself. And then, there's the most dominant offensive force part of Wilt that just ends that debate.

Tim is the best all time at center? That is his position.
http://www.82games.com/0708/07SAS19C.HTM

Agreed on the MJ>Kobe obviously. :)


As i said, I wont argue against Wilt over Russel...Russel is just my all time favourite center.

Duncan best center?...Who said center???
Image
User avatar
mudyez
Analyst
Posts: 3,123
And1: 3
Joined: Mar 18, 2004
Location: parts unknown

 

Post#7 » by mudyez » Sat Mar 8, 2008 7:41 pm

Image
User avatar
kooldude
Lead Assistant
Posts: 4,823
And1: 78
Joined: Jul 08, 2007

 

Post#8 » by kooldude » Sat Mar 8, 2008 7:46 pm

If Duncan is listed as a PF, then surely, he would be GOAT PF but he plays the center position, no matter what's he listed on the roster list.
Warspite wrote:I still would take Mitch (Richmond) over just about any SG playing today. His peak is better than 2011 Kobe and with 90s rules hes better than Wade.


Jordan23Forever wrote:People are delusional.
User avatar
mudyez
Analyst
Posts: 3,123
And1: 3
Joined: Mar 18, 2004
Location: parts unknown

 

Post#9 » by mudyez » Sat Mar 8, 2008 7:57 pm

couldnt find him in any GOAT-Center list, whoch could meen two things:

1. he is really bad
2. he isnt a center

dont want to get to deep into that, because the thread is about something else, but if allstarballoting says so (for all years but this), if you play alongside rasho, robinson, willis or nazr, if can hit some 3pters in the shootingstarscompetition (j/k) and if you are listed in so many best-PF artciles (I only listed the ones where he was first ;)), then he should be considered a PF for career, even while I'd also say, that he plays more of a center role with the recent frontcourtpartners right now

...as a center I'd list him at 5th or 6th (bill, kareem, wilt, shaq, hakeem)
Image
penbeast0
Senior Mod - NBA Player Comparisons
Senior Mod - NBA Player Comparisons
Posts: 30,347
And1: 9,901
Joined: Aug 14, 2004
Location: South Florida
 

 

Post#10 » by penbeast0 » Sat Mar 8, 2008 8:07 pm

With all due respect, this isn't that close. Russell beat Wilt repeatedly even when Wilt had equal or superior help (2 out of the three years Wilt played with the 76ers plus again when Wilt was with the Lakers!); MJ has proven far more about his ability to win championships than Kobe, and Duncan than Garnett. The Wilt team will look more impressive, the Russell team will win the championships . . . history say so.
“Most people use statistics like a drunk man uses a lamppost; more for support than illumination,” Andrew Lang.
User avatar
kooldude
Lead Assistant
Posts: 4,823
And1: 78
Joined: Jul 08, 2007

 

Post#11 » by kooldude » Sat Mar 8, 2008 8:15 pm

mudyez wrote:couldnt find him in any GOAT-Center list, whoch could meen two things:

1. he is really bad
2. he isnt a center

dont want to get to deep into that, because the thread is about something else, but if allstarballoting says so (for all years but this), if you play alongside rasho, robinson, willis or nazr, if can hit some 3pters in the shootingstarscompetition (j/k) and if you are listed in so many best-PF artciles (I only listed the ones where he was first ;)), then he should be considered a PF for career, even while I'd also say, that he plays more of a center role with the recent frontcourtpartners right now

...as a center I'd list him at 5th or 6th (bill, kareem, wilt, shaq, hakeem)


From wiki:

Likewise, some would say that Tim Duncan, although listed throughout his career as a power forward, is actually a center, because of his size and style of play. In fact, he has been playing more minutes at the center position than the power position as of late. [1]This is because it is believed that when Duncan entered the NBA, he played power forward in order to keep San Antonio Spurs teammate David Robinson playing as center and have two dominant big men on the floor. However, Duncan has continued to be listed as a power forward even after Robinson's retirement.


Duncan didn't just played center this year, he did last year and if 82games kept their position playing time beyond last year, I'm sure it would show that Duncan played C for a long time now.

I liked the example a mod said before: if Steve Nash and Jason Kidd played on the same floor, are they not still PGs?

If Jordan was listed on a SF list, he would be #1 SF too but it doesn't mean he's a SF.
Warspite wrote:I still would take Mitch (Richmond) over just about any SG playing today. His peak is better than 2011 Kobe and with 90s rules hes better than Wade.


Jordan23Forever wrote:People are delusional.
User avatar
kooldude
Lead Assistant
Posts: 4,823
And1: 78
Joined: Jul 08, 2007

 

Post#12 » by kooldude » Sat Mar 8, 2008 8:20 pm

penbeast0 wrote:With all due respect, this isn't that close. Russell beat Wilt repeatedly even when Wilt had equal or superior help (2 out of the three years Wilt played with the 76ers plus again when Wilt was with the Lakers!); MJ has proven far more about his ability to win championships than Kobe, and Duncan than Garnett. The Wilt team will look more impressive, the Russell team will win the championships . . . history say so.


But a large part of Russell's success against Wilt was the chemistry developed with his teammates and his ability to utilize his role to the fullest. This would be a completely different team for Russell so I don't think you can apply Russell's success with one core of players to this.

I also don't believe Kobe or KG had a 2nd option has good as Pippen.
Warspite wrote:I still would take Mitch (Richmond) over just about any SG playing today. His peak is better than 2011 Kobe and with 90s rules hes better than Wade.


Jordan23Forever wrote:People are delusional.
User avatar
mudyez
Analyst
Posts: 3,123
And1: 3
Joined: Mar 18, 2004
Location: parts unknown

 

Post#13 » by mudyez » Sat Mar 8, 2008 8:35 pm

kooldude wrote:-= original quote snipped =-



But a large part of Russell's success against Wilt was the chemistry developed with his teammates and his ability to utilize his role to the fullest. This would be a completely different team for Russell so I don't think you can apply Russell's success with one core of players to this.

I also don't believe Kobe or KG had a 2nd option has good as Pippen.


thats what I love most about the russel+duncan frontline: they seem to suit whatever they get as a backcourt...I would say the same about KG but in summary Wild+KG are not as good in that regard than the other lineup

for me it was pretty easy...if you take a look at the thread about the best 15 player (3x5positions) my first team was russel-duncan-bird-jordan-magic
Image
User avatar
PDXKnight
RealGM
Posts: 26,156
And1: 3,111
Joined: May 29, 2007
Location: Portland
   

 

Post#14 » by PDXKnight » Sat Mar 8, 2008 8:47 pm

Definitely Jordan, Duncan, and Russell. That front line would be fierce on both offense and defense, and TD and Russell could score in the post while MJ would be the big outside threat. Bryant, KG, and Wilt would be INCREDIBLE, but they don't match the balance of offense-defense that MJ, TD, and BR would bring.
jzmagik
Banned User
Posts: 5,528
And1: 0
Joined: May 06, 2005
Location: NYC

 

Post#15 » by jzmagik » Sat Mar 8, 2008 9:19 pm

Team 1 has a combined 21 rings with finals mvps. How many does team 2 have?
User avatar
tracey_nice
Analyst
Posts: 3,531
And1: 274
Joined: Jan 08, 2008
Location: PAUUSE

 

Post#16 » by tracey_nice » Sat Mar 8, 2008 11:56 pm

Team 2 could go off for a 181 points any given night.
TheSheriff
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,658
And1: 3,461
Joined: Aug 04, 2007

 

Post#17 » by TheSheriff » Sun Mar 9, 2008 12:11 am

Team 1 easily, Russell could guard Wilt. Duncan v KG is a slit edge to Duncan, and Jordan is the GOAT.
User avatar
farzi
RealGM
Posts: 12,485
And1: 5
Joined: Dec 20, 2007

 

Post#18 » by farzi » Sun Mar 9, 2008 12:13 am

tracey_nice wrote:Team 2 could go off for a 181 points any given night.


Uh...
Thank you for all the memories BRoy. You were a class act and brought hope to an entire region for 5 years. You will be missed.
TheSheriff
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,658
And1: 3,461
Joined: Aug 04, 2007

 

Post#19 » by TheSheriff » Sun Mar 9, 2008 12:15 am

tracey_nice wrote:Team 2 could go off for a 181 points any given night.


not against team 1. Team 1 could hold the opponents under 60 on any given night.
Chris435
Starter
Posts: 2,469
And1: 58
Joined: Feb 24, 2008
 

 

Post#20 » by Chris435 » Sun Mar 9, 2008 12:16 am

jordan, duncan, russell... can they lose?

Return to Player Comparisons