ImageImageImageImageImage

Minnesota (12-48) at Sacramento (27-34)

Moderators: KF10, codydaze

Calinks
Forum Mod - Timberwolves
Forum Mod - Timberwolves
Posts: 50,413
And1: 17,372
Joined: Mar 29, 2006
   

 

Post#61 » by Calinks » Sat Mar 8, 2008 6:51 am

Good game fellas. I really like this game thread. It's the most comprehensive game thread I have seen. K-Mart is a beast.
When luck shuts the door skill comes in through the window.
theGreatRC
RealGM
Posts: 18,531
And1: 4,994
Joined: Oct 12, 2006
Location: California
 

 

Post#62 » by theGreatRC » Sat Mar 8, 2008 7:22 am

Yeah, that a-rod dude is a beast at making game threads.
Dysfunctional Wolves fan
Ballings7
RealGM
Posts: 24,248
And1: 2,054
Joined: Jan 04, 2006

 

Post#63 » by Ballings7 » Sat Mar 8, 2008 7:54 am

I basically watched the Spurs tonight, already decided I would anyway because that was the more meaningful game coming in.

When I was watching the 1st qtr and up to the 2nd, I didn't like the way the game was going. Saw it still wasn't good when checking up on it.

So didn't get to see Kevin's 48, definitely impressive, but it means less because of the loss. Which is a shame.

Another horrible loss. I'd guess rebounding and interior defense did us in once again.
SacKingZZZ
RealGM
Posts: 24,085
And1: 1,084
Joined: Feb 19, 2005
Location: "Look at me, Dave, look. Come and touch it, Dave."

 

Post#64 » by SacKingZZZ » Sat Mar 8, 2008 8:05 am

No, not really either. The TWolves were freaking HOT from midrange. At one point every single shot seemed to be going in.
Ballings7
RealGM
Posts: 24,248
And1: 2,054
Joined: Jan 04, 2006

 

Post#65 » by Ballings7 » Sat Mar 8, 2008 8:06 am

KIE wrote:I don't think the Hawes/Williams front court duo should be judged based on how they perform at the end of this season. They need a lot more time practicing and playing together before they can be expected to be a real "duo".


SKZZZ wrote:Agree. On paper they actually make quite the complimentary duo in fact. More time is needed for sure and hopefully that will be plentiful in the coming months/years.


Agreed, guys. As well as natural improvement to their games.
The Playoffs don't care about your Analytics
Ballings7
RealGM
Posts: 24,248
And1: 2,054
Joined: Jan 04, 2006

 

Post#66 » by Ballings7 » Sat Mar 8, 2008 8:14 am

Chris Richard had a nice lil' game for himself :). He's going to be another one of those solid helper big men in this league.

SKZZZ wrote:No, not really either. The TWolves were freaking HOT from midrange. At one point every single shot seemed to be going in.


Ah, alright then.

Though Craig Smith couldn't miss with 18 pts on 8-9 FG.
The Playoffs don't care about your Analytics
Sac Fan in Clipper town
Sophomore
Posts: 150
And1: 0
Joined: Aug 31, 2006

 

Post#67 » by Sac Fan in Clipper town » Sat Mar 8, 2008 12:02 pm

Effort levels not there. Play some kids, there's nothing left to play for this season. Fans want to see the future also.
User avatar
KingInExile
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 14,416
And1: 4
Joined: May 25, 2004
Location: RIP Wayman Tisdale...You left us way too early.

 

Post#68 » by KingInExile » Sat Mar 8, 2008 4:27 pm

SacKingZZZ wrote:Theus sent a message tonight and it was well deserved. The young guys got more experience and that is what we need to be focusing on people! There is no miracle comeback this year. It's going to be a long summer and this franchise needs to get a look at all the young players it's stacked up for the last couple of years.

The only message Theus sent last night was that if you are not playing well, you won't be paying at the end of the game...simple as that. Miller was playing like crap all game while Spencer and Williams were making the most of the time they had on the floor. Simple choice to go with the guys who are working. Although Salmons played well early, he was starting to make dumb decisions towards the end. Simple decision to yank a guy who is showing signs of being a liability for someone else.

Don't read more into this coaching decision than is actually there. His decision had more to do with who was producing last night and less to do with "development opportunity". It just so happened that the young bigs were the ones producing.

On a similar note, Jerry made an excellent point during the game last night with respect to playing time distribution. A bunch of you are screaming "play the young guys, they need all the opportunity to develop". Well that conflicts with a critical need of Petrie's right now, which is to carefully evaluate the vets on the team so he can make some decisions on who will stay and who will go this summer. And since he will most likely be shopping some of those vets this summer, he needs to make sure he continues to showcase them to potential trading partners. I'm pretty sure Petrie is secure with the young guys he has; he has a good idea about their potential and he knows what the coaching staff will do to develop them. It's not so easy with the vets, though.
This space needs to be filled with a new sig...but I'm too lazy to make one.
User avatar
KingInExile
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 14,416
And1: 4
Joined: May 25, 2004
Location: RIP Wayman Tisdale...You left us way too early.

 

Post#69 » by KingInExile » Sat Mar 8, 2008 4:33 pm

KingInExile wrote:Gomes will have a monster night against us.


17pts on 8-17 shooting, 7 boards, 2 assists and a steal. Maybe not a "monster" night, but certainly one of his better performances of the last several weeks.
This space needs to be filled with a new sig...but I'm too lazy to make one.
User avatar
kandiking
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,551
And1: 1
Joined: Jul 21, 2007

 

Post#70 » by kandiking » Sat Mar 8, 2008 5:31 pm

good game, i imagine you just want to see what your young players can do, of all the teams i can see your team benefitting the most from tanking, because there's such a buildup of teams within 4 games of you in the east, and they all want to win. BTW hawes will be solid.
Vindicater wrote:KWSN-Men is by far my favourite poster on realgm. He just takes so much punishment and just keeps coming back for more.
ICMTM
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 16,347
And1: 176
Joined: Jun 20, 2004
Location: Sacramento, Ca
     

 

Post#71 » by ICMTM » Sat Mar 8, 2008 5:49 pm

joeyyowee wrote:I didn't say the Kings are better without Artest. I said Martin is better without Artest. There's a big difference between those 2 statements.


Then Martin needs to learn how to play with others.
KANGZZZZZ!
KF10
Forum Mod - Kings
Forum Mod - Kings
Posts: 25,436
And1: 5,537
Joined: Jul 28, 2006
 

 

Post#72 » by KF10 » Sat Mar 8, 2008 8:04 pm

ICMTM wrote:-= original quote snipped =-



Then Martin needs to learn how to play with others.


To be fair, Martin is starting to show promise in his playmaking skills...He shows that he could play through the flow of the offense and make other players better....Even though, it doesnt really show in the stats but it is there....
ICMTM
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 16,347
And1: 176
Joined: Jun 20, 2004
Location: Sacramento, Ca
     

 

Post#73 » by ICMTM » Sat Mar 8, 2008 10:11 pm

Define promise...
KANGZZZZZ!
User avatar
KingInExile
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 14,416
And1: 4
Joined: May 25, 2004
Location: RIP Wayman Tisdale...You left us way too early.

 

Post#74 » by KingInExile » Sat Mar 8, 2008 10:47 pm

ICMTM wrote:Define promise...

If the posts were available, I would say go back a few years and read all old post regarding Peja and his "potential" for the definition of "promise". As time goes by I see so many similarities between the two in the "potential" each have had at this stage of their career.
This space needs to be filled with a new sig...but I'm too lazy to make one.
ICMTM
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 16,347
And1: 176
Joined: Jun 20, 2004
Location: Sacramento, Ca
     

 

Post#75 » by ICMTM » Sat Mar 8, 2008 10:51 pm

As long as we recognize how it ended with Peja I buy that!
KANGZZZZZ!
KF10
Forum Mod - Kings
Forum Mod - Kings
Posts: 25,436
And1: 5,537
Joined: Jul 28, 2006
 

 

Post#76 » by KF10 » Sun Mar 9, 2008 4:57 am

ICMTM wrote:Define promise...


I truly believe that Martin will develop his playmaking skills. He is still young and eager to know...As evident, Martin has a good to great court awareness...There is no denying about that...Even his scouting report before entering the NBA it says that he has a great court awareness for a SG... Eh, either way, I will not be surprised that in his prime he averages around 4/5 assists per game...I see Martin just a level below of a superstar in his prime...That's pretty damn good... Eh, that's my view of Martin....
BMiller52
RealGM
Posts: 10,403
And1: 0
Joined: Sep 22, 2005
Location: my house

 

Post#77 » by BMiller52 » Sun Mar 9, 2008 5:13 am

KingInExile wrote:-= original quote snipped =-


If the posts were available, I would say go back a few years and read all old post regarding Peja and his "potential" for the definition of "promise". As time goes by I see so many similarities between the two in the "potential" each have had at this stage of their career.


Peja never showed the aggressiveness Kevin showed last night, and he whined a lot. Kevin doesn't whine. He's also had more clutch plays in his 2-3 years of actually playing than Peja had in his 7. I think he'll work on his ball handling this summer, and if he does IMO that could put him on the next level right below superstar. Sort of where TMac is right now IMO.
Image
sackings916
Assistant Coach
Posts: 4,266
And1: 866
Joined: Sep 07, 2002

 

Post#78 » by sackings916 » Sun Mar 9, 2008 6:37 am

kingsfan10 wrote:-= original quote snipped =-



I truly believe that Martin will develop his playmaking skills. He is still young and eager to know...As evident, Martin has a good to great court awareness...There is no denying about that...Even his scouting report before entering the NBA it says that he has a great court awareness for a SG... Eh, either way, I will not be surprised that in his prime he averages around 4/5 assists per game...I see Martin just a level below of a superstar in his prime...That's pretty damn good... Eh, that's my view of Martin....


There's some things you can't teach. You can't turn a scorer into a playmaker. I think Kmarts playmaking can get slightly better, but I think him averaging 5 assists a game is a stretch. He may not even get to Artest's level, who is putting up 4 a game.
KF10
Forum Mod - Kings
Forum Mod - Kings
Posts: 25,436
And1: 5,537
Joined: Jul 28, 2006
 

 

Post#79 » by KF10 » Sun Mar 9, 2008 6:57 am

sackings916 wrote:-= original quote snipped =-



There's some things you can't teach. You can't turn a scorer into a playmaker. I think Kmarts playmaking can get slightly better, but I think him averaging 5 assists a game is a stretch. He may not even get to Artest's level, who is putting up 4 a game.


Why makes you say that? I know he wont be a great playmaker but he is capable of putting around 4/5 assists during his prime...Artest is averaging 4ish assists because he causes mismatches in the post and the opposing team double (or even triple team him) thus our shooters are open...When Martin gets better on his ball handling and develops some sort of turnaround jumper, opposing teams will see Martin as a HUGE threat moreso as Artest...Again, he still has a great court awareness as a SG. (Even his college scouting report says that and etc...).
SacKingZZZ
RealGM
Posts: 24,085
And1: 1,084
Joined: Feb 19, 2005
Location: "Look at me, Dave, look. Come and touch it, Dave."

 

Post#80 » by SacKingZZZ » Sun Mar 9, 2008 7:51 am

KingInExile wrote:-= original quote snipped =-


The only message Theus sent last night was that if you are not playing well, you won't be paying at the end of the game...simple as that. Miller was playing like crap all game while Spencer and Williams were making the most of the time they had on the floor. Simple choice to go with the guys who are working. Although Salmons played well early, he was starting to make dumb decisions towards the end. Simple decision to yank a guy who is showing signs of being a liability for someone else.

Don't read more into this coaching decision than is actually there. His decision had more to do with who was producing last night and less to do with "development opportunity". It just so happened that the young bigs were the ones producing.

On a similar note, Jerry made an excellent point during the game last night with respect to playing time distribution. A bunch of you are screaming "play the young guys, they need all the opportunity to develop". Well that conflicts with a critical need of Petrie's right now, which is to carefully evaluate the vets on the team so he can make some decisions on who will stay and who will go this summer. And since he will most likely be shopping some of those vets this summer, he needs to make sure he continues to showcase them to potential trading partners. I'm pretty sure Petrie is secure with the young guys he has; he has a good idea about their potential and he knows what the coaching staff will do to develop them. It's not so easy with the vets, though.



The tone of his post game was a little bit more harsh than that if my ears were hearing correctly.

If that decision can't be made now then it never will be. 2 years is plenty long enough.

Return to Sacramento Kings