ImageImage

Landing another lotto pick.

Moderators: MickeyDavis, paulpressey25

midranger
RealGM
Posts: 39,434
And1: 11,238
Joined: May 12, 2002

Landing another lotto pick. 

Post#1 » by midranger » Mon Mar 10, 2008 6:06 am

I read somewhere (I honestly can't remember where) that the Clippers may be interested in dealing their lotto pick for established talent. The thought being that Brand, Kaman, and Maggette are ready now, but need some help. Specifically, help at the SG and PG.

Bucks Trade:
Michael Redd
Charlie Villanueva

Bucks Get:
Tim Thomas
Cuttino Mobley
Clippers Pick Currently #6


Clippers Trade:
Tim Thomas
Cuttino Mobley
Pick

Clippers Get:
Michael Redd
Kyle Lowry


Memphis Trades:
Kyle Lowry

Memphis Gets:
Charlie Villanueva

Leaves the Clippers with a starting lineup of...

Lowry
Redd
Maggette
Brand
Kaman

Leaves us with two lotto picks and two contracts that are more manageable and a year shorter than Redd alone. We'd have a big time glut at SF, so Simmons and/or Thomas would have to be moved in a separate deal.
User avatar
trwi7
RealGM
Posts: 111,686
And1: 27,269
Joined: Jul 12, 2006
Location: Aussie bias
         

 

Post#2 » by trwi7 » Mon Mar 10, 2008 6:08 am

I would do it.
stellation wrote:What's the difference between Gery Woelful and this glass of mineral water? The mineral water actually has a source."


I Hate Manure wrote:We look to be awful next season without Beasley.
midranger
RealGM
Posts: 39,434
And1: 11,238
Joined: May 12, 2002

 

Post#3 » by midranger » Mon Mar 10, 2008 6:09 am

It only works if we really like the talent in the top half of the lotto.
Please reconsider your animal consumption.
midranger
RealGM
Posts: 39,434
And1: 11,238
Joined: May 12, 2002

 

Post#4 » by midranger » Mon Mar 10, 2008 6:21 am

Follow-Up Trade Alert

Bell
Gadzuric
Simmons

to Denver for

Kenyon Martin
Steven Hunter

Leaves us with...

Mo Williams
Cuttino Mobley
Desmond Mason
Yi
Bogut

Kenyon Martin
Tim Thomas
Ramon Sessions
David Noel

2 Mid-Lotto picks
Please reconsider your animal consumption.
User avatar
Nowak008
RealGM
Posts: 14,588
And1: 4,303
Joined: Jul 07, 2006
Location: Book Publisher
Contact:

 

Post#5 » by Nowak008 » Mon Mar 10, 2008 6:39 am

Sounds pretty fair for the Bucks and Clips. Don't see the griz trading lowry for CV though.

Trading Redd for their pick would be great. Hopefully that would mean two top 8 picks. The possibilities would be endless.

Bayless/Mayo
Collison/Gordon
Mayo/Gallinari
Collison/Mayo

:droop:
Image
John Hammond apologists:
emunney wrote:
Ron Swanson wrote: 9 YEARS!? like any of that matters


THAT LITERALLY IS HIS TENURE.
LISTEN2JAZZ
RealGM
Posts: 13,295
And1: 196
Joined: Feb 21, 2005
Location: Madison
 

 

Post#6 » by LISTEN2JAZZ » Mon Mar 10, 2008 12:59 pm

I like this trade. I posted a similar one a week ago, saying that between us and the Clippers we should put together one contending team, and one rebuilding team. Either send us Brand for Yi and our lotto pick, or have us send Redd for their pick.
skones
RealGM
Posts: 37,108
And1: 17,267
Joined: Jul 20, 2004

 

Post#7 » by skones » Mon Mar 10, 2008 1:12 pm

Another idea that may or may not be possible with the Clippers:

Redd
Mo

for

Mobley
Thomas
Livingston
Thornton
2008 1st via LAC
User avatar
worthlessBucks
RealGM
Posts: 22,566
And1: 4,932
Joined: Jan 26, 2005
Location: Bucks Logo
   

 

Post#8 » by worthlessBucks » Mon Mar 10, 2008 1:28 pm

I'm all for targeting the Clippers pick (have had my sights on it for awhile). I saw a thread regarding them trading the pick on the Blazers board, didn't see a story though but that might be where you saw the topic midranger.

skones wrote:Another idea that may or may not be possible with the Clippers:

Redd
Mo

for

Mobley
Thomas
Livingston
Thornton
2008 1st via LAC

I'm thinking the Clippers would want something else if they give us Livingston, Thornton, and their #1 in 08. Livingston is also a free agent, so not sure how possible this scenario is.

Frankly, almost everyone on this team (and within the organization) needs to go. Redd, Mo, Gadz, Bobby, Bell, etc..every one of them should be explored in deals and I can't really comprehend how **** stupid our management is to not make 1 single move at the deadline.

In any event, we'll probably find a way to screw up building a team correctly even when we possess 2 top 10 lottery picks.
skones
RealGM
Posts: 37,108
And1: 17,267
Joined: Jul 20, 2004

 

Post#9 » by skones » Mon Mar 10, 2008 1:31 pm

Yeah, but my thinking was them trading the rights of Livingston, is that possible?
msiris
RealGM
Posts: 10,982
And1: 2,249
Joined: Jul 25, 2005
Location: Central Wisconsin

 

Post#10 » by msiris » Mon Mar 10, 2008 1:38 pm

Would any of you take a chance on drafting Thabeet? If we got an extra pick I would.
Ride the tank
User avatar
trwi7
RealGM
Posts: 111,686
And1: 27,269
Joined: Jul 12, 2006
Location: Aussie bias
         

 

Post#11 » by trwi7 » Mon Mar 10, 2008 1:40 pm

msiris wrote:Would any of you take a chance on drafting Thabeet? If we got an extra pick I would.


I would.
stellation wrote:What's the difference between Gery Woelful and this glass of mineral water? The mineral water actually has a source."


I Hate Manure wrote:We look to be awful next season without Beasley.
User avatar
jerrod
RealGM
Posts: 34,178
And1: 133
Joined: Aug 31, 2003
Location: The Berkeley of the midwest/ born with the intent/ to distress any government/ right of the left
     

 

Post#12 » by jerrod » Mon Mar 10, 2008 2:32 pm

what kind of value does livingston have do you guys think?
User avatar
trwi7
RealGM
Posts: 111,686
And1: 27,269
Joined: Jul 12, 2006
Location: Aussie bias
         

 

Post#13 » by trwi7 » Mon Mar 10, 2008 2:35 pm

jerrod wrote:what kind of value does livingston have do you guys think?


About as much value as you or me. He still is recovering from that knee injury.
stellation wrote:What's the difference between Gery Woelful and this glass of mineral water? The mineral water actually has a source."


I Hate Manure wrote:We look to be awful next season without Beasley.
skones
RealGM
Posts: 37,108
And1: 17,267
Joined: Jul 20, 2004

 

Post#14 » by skones » Mon Mar 10, 2008 3:28 pm

trwi7 wrote:-= original quote snipped =-



About as much value as you or me. He still is recovering from that knee injury.


Which is why his rights are a good get. Low risk, high reward.
midranger
RealGM
Posts: 39,434
And1: 11,238
Joined: May 12, 2002

 

Post#15 » by midranger » Mon Mar 10, 2008 3:49 pm

I highly doubt that the Clipps would trade Livingston for next to nothing at this point.
User avatar
jerrod
RealGM
Posts: 34,178
And1: 133
Joined: Aug 31, 2003
Location: The Berkeley of the midwest/ born with the intent/ to distress any government/ right of the left
     

 

Post#16 » by jerrod » Mon Mar 10, 2008 3:52 pm

midranger wrote:I highly doubt that the Clipps would trade Livingston for next to nothing at this point.


yeah, they have very little to lose at this point, he'll stay loyal to them and if he's not back by the time his contract is up he'll resign for short term small deal and keep trying
skones
RealGM
Posts: 37,108
And1: 17,267
Joined: Jul 20, 2004

 

Post#17 » by skones » Mon Mar 10, 2008 4:12 pm

If the deal were good enough, I think they'd willingly use him to sweeten the pot. It depends if they believe Mo could lead that team.
User avatar
BrewCityBBQ
Analyst
Posts: 3,107
And1: 79
Joined: Jul 21, 2004
Location: Zombie Dust
     

 

Post#18 » by BrewCityBBQ » Mon Mar 10, 2008 4:27 pm

If I were GM, I would do this without batting an eye.

Pick up another 1st rounder to go with ours and we can really be rebuilding instead of half rebuilding and half trying to win now.

Return to Milwaukee Bucks