Now its time for another fine moment with Agent Zero

Moderators: bwgood77, zimpy27, infinite11285, Clav, Domejandro, ken6199, bisme37, Dirk, KingDavid, cupcakesnake

User avatar
BirdIsDaKing
Bench Warmer
Posts: 1,497
And1: 320
Joined: Jul 09, 2005

Now its time for another fine moment with Agent Zero 

Post#1 » by BirdIsDaKing » Tue Mar 11, 2008 7:03 pm

Agent Zero Blog:

This has been a big, big thought of mine lately. I don
magicfan4life05
RealGM
Posts: 23,617
And1: 198
Joined: Jun 29, 2005
Location: Welcome back the Comeback King !

 

Post#2 » by magicfan4life05 » Tue Mar 11, 2008 7:07 pm

I consider Tony Parker a pure point guard because he only scores in transition. In half court, he really doesn
Dwight Howard on his FT struggles:

"I just think everybody needs to stop talking about it," Howard said. "There's more to life than free throws."
User avatar
ss1986v2
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,635
And1: 1
Joined: Mar 07, 2004
Location: San Antonio, Tx
 

 

Post#3 » by ss1986v2 » Tue Mar 11, 2008 7:20 pm

hes still one of my favorite players off the court. i just love the candor, regardless of whether i agree or not.
Stupidity Should be Painful!
LakerFanMan
Lead Assistant
Posts: 4,658
And1: 16
Joined: Dec 22, 2006

 

Post#4 » by LakerFanMan » Tue Mar 11, 2008 7:41 pm

Arenas is the Charles Barkley of blogs. It's awesome.
User avatar
Ming Kong!
RealGM
Posts: 24,480
And1: 31
Joined: Nov 21, 2002
Location: Jazz fan in Miami, FL.

 

Post#5 » by Ming Kong! » Tue Mar 11, 2008 7:54 pm

I really appreciate that a guy who makes millions can actually sit down and write a blog. I think he's complaining cause when people make an argument of best PGs they name Nash, Paul, Williams, Davis, Billups, Parker, etc.., but not Arenas, because he simply doesn't remind us of a PG. I'd say he's a SG who can run the ball up the court, much like Kobe has done for most of his career, but Kobe has always played along side a PG, making Kobe a clear SG.

Now with Arenas, he has Stevenson at SG, and Stevenson obviously isn't a PG, but Arenas while at PG doesn't make a whole lot of noise in the discussion for PG since his scoring outweighs his assists so much. Seriously though, if we take out Arenas from the PG discussion, and don't even include him the SG discussion, we're being very unfair to him when other PGs are similar, like Parker who averages 18.3ppg but only 5.8apg. In comparison, Nash, Paul, and Williams all average over 1 assist for every 2 points, which is much more typical of a PG.

To me Arenas is like Iverson. You can place him at the PG spot, but you'll never refer to him as a PG.
User avatar
TheKingOfVa360
General Manager
Posts: 8,326
And1: 1,663
Joined: Jun 27, 2006
Location: Orange County, California
         

 

Post#6 » by TheKingOfVa360 » Tue Mar 11, 2008 8:01 pm

Arenas is a PG and one of the best doing it. He is right up there with Nash, Paul, and Billups as the best PG's. I use to always get mad when people said Billups wasn't a PG. If he is playing a PG he is a PG period. Just like when people say Duncan isn't a PF but a Center, if he is playing PF he is a PF period.
User avatar
bill curley II
Lead Assistant
Posts: 4,594
And1: 1
Joined: Aug 05, 2004
Location: Earth

 

Post#7 » by bill curley II » Tue Mar 11, 2008 9:22 pm

magicfan4life05 wrote:
I consider Tony Parker a pure point guard because he only scores in transition. In half court, he really doesn
Moses_Malone95
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,820
And1: 28
Joined: Jan 27, 2003
Location: IUPG

 

Post#8 » by Moses_Malone95 » Tue Mar 11, 2008 9:25 pm

A point guard is someone who runs the offense and makes his teams better before he looks to score. There shouldn't be any statistical or height criteria for something that basically boils down to the role a player has on the team. I don't view Gilbert Arenas as a point guard because he looks for his shot most of the time, and brags about his scoring exploits. He's a shooting guard playing out of position.
User avatar
Wizards2Lottery
RealGM
Posts: 10,317
And1: 26
Joined: Jun 25, 2006
Location: All aboard the TANK

 

Post#9 » by Wizards2Lottery » Tue Mar 11, 2008 9:32 pm

Moses_Malone95 wrote:A point guard is someone who runs the offense and makes his teams better before he looks to score. There shouldn't be any statistical or height criteria for something that basically boils down to the role a player has on the team. I don't view Gilbert Arenas as a point guard because he looks for his shot most of the time, and brags about his scoring exploits. He's a shooting guard playing out of position.


You need to brush up on your knowledge if you don't think Arenas makes his team and teammates better.
Moses_Malone95
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,820
And1: 28
Joined: Jan 27, 2003
Location: IUPG

 

Post#10 » by Moses_Malone95 » Tue Mar 11, 2008 9:34 pm

Compared to other top point guards in the league, he doesn't do as well.
User avatar
thamadkant
Suns Forum Picker of Cherries
Posts: 16,916
And1: 8,598
Joined: Jan 06, 2007
 

 

Post#11 » by thamadkant » Tue Mar 11, 2008 10:25 pm

Arenas is a shooting guard playing the point guard position.
He makes his team mates better in that, he requires a lot of attention as he is an extremely talented scorer.

But as in running the offense and moving the ball accordingly and making plays... he is "okay" at it. Again most of the times he gets an assists its because the attention/defense was focused on him...

as opposed to Paul, Nash, Williams etc, these players... they are the director of the offense... and as shown when needed, they are THE offense sometimes.

Return to The General Board