could any team go 82-0 if..................

thaAteam · Post #1 » by **thaAteam** » Tue Mar 11, 2008 10:08 pm

they had the knicks on the schedule all 82 games, they are a terrible team, probably one of the worst i have ever seen in my life, they got spanked the last few games so could one of the elite teams if healthy go perfect against the knicks

Ian4 · Post #2 » by **Ian4** » Tue Mar 11, 2008 10:09 pm

for sure against the knicks :lol:

Cevap · Post #3 » by **Cevap** » Tue Mar 11, 2008 10:10 pm

No.

Even if the 96-97 Bulls play today's knicks, they would not win all the games

exkonvict · Post #4 » by **exkonvict** » Tue Mar 11, 2008 10:12 pm

Cevap wrote:No.

Even if the 96-97 Bulls play today's knicks, they would not win all the games

Michael Jordan would average 60 points against Crawful.

TheKingNbooby · Post #5 » by **TheKingNbooby** » Tue Mar 11, 2008 10:14 pm

Naw Craw would be hot which means he ll drop 100. I really like crawford and think he gets to much hate, on a better team hes a 25 PPG player

Basileus777 · Post #6 » by **Basileus777** » Tue Mar 11, 2008 10:17 pm

No, definitely not. Every team has lapses. Ask Detroit about losing to this Knicks team.

Hell that 72 win Bulls team lost to the Raptors.

Post #7 » by **5DOM** » Tue Mar 11, 2008 10:18 pm

i seriously think 96-97 bulls would be able to.

Post #8 » by **FFBlitzace** » Tue Mar 11, 2008 10:20 pm

Crawford could get hot and lead them to victory a couple times.

Post #9 » by **Turisas** » Tue Mar 11, 2008 10:34 pm

5DOM wrote:i seriously think 96-97 bulls would be able to.

Doubt it. Remember the Bulls had off-nights as well. The Knicks beat them by 32 in 96'.

Truthiracy · Post #10 » by **Truthiracy** » Tue Mar 11, 2008 11:25 pm

No team can play perfect basketball for all 82 games.

PHANTOMPHOENIX · Post #11 » by **PHANTOMPHOENIX** » Tue Mar 11, 2008 11:32 pm

You guys underestimate the Knicks. The trick is to beat them the first dozen times. After that half the Knick roster would go AWOL and they would have to forfeit the remaining 60 games.

Post #12 » by **5DOM** » Tue Mar 11, 2008 11:38 pm

PHANTOMPHOENIX wrote:You guys underestimate the Knicks. The trick is to beat them the first dozen times. After that half the Knick roster would go AWOL and they would have to forfeit the remaining 60 games.

i overestimated your math skills

Play_Smart! · Post #13 » by **Play_Smart!** » Tue Mar 11, 2008 11:42 pm

LucerneStDoggz wrote:No team can play perfect basketball for all 82 games.

Exactly

KB20 · Post #14 » by **KB20** » Tue Mar 11, 2008 11:54 pm

The 96-97 Bulls could probably beat them at least 70 times.

Storm Surge · Post #15 » by **Storm Surge** » Tue Mar 11, 2008 11:59 pm

KB20 wrote:The 96-97 Bulls could probably beat them at least 70 times.

They would win at least 79 games, I could see them losing 3.

NY MAVURS · Post #16 » by **NY MAVURS** » Wed Mar 12, 2008 12:41 am

Calm down everyone, seriously....

PHANTOMPHOENIX · Post #17 » by **PHANTOMPHOENIX** » Wed Mar 12, 2008 1:00 am

5DOM wrote:-= original quote snipped =-

i overestimated your math skills

Why do I got a feeling there is a 70 in one of my reports that shouldn't be there.

This is why you shouldn't surf realgm and do work at the same time.

C'mon Cavs · Post #18 » by **C'mon Cavs** » Wed Mar 12, 2008 1:05 am

For as bad as the Knicks are, they have a lot of individual talent. Of course no team would beat them 82 times.

Maybe if a team played the Grizzlies (after the Gasol trade) then they could beat them 82 times. I really think that the Grizzlies are the kind of team that could lose all the games because they dont have an inside presence on defense, and they dont have a go to guy.

halfHAVOC · Post #19 » by **halfHAVOC** » Wed Mar 12, 2008 1:05 am

Post #20 » by **og15** » Wed Mar 12, 2008 1:07 am

TheKingNbooby wrote:Naw Craw would be hot which means he ll drop 100. I really like crawford and think he gets to much hate, on a better team hes a 25 PPG player

Why would he average more points on a better team? :lol: