GM a Team Part 3 (Transactions) unsticky plz

[zong]

-= original quote snipped =-



well, he then made a mistake by giving you that pick. Cuz he gave me that pick as a compensation for a deal (involving iggy) that was later voided due to various reasons. I own that pick, I think he forgot or something.

i got that pick from minnesota in the ratliff deal, because i traded philly MY OWN 09 2nd in the aldridge deal

[Raptors90102]

-= original quote snipped =-



i got that pick from minnesota in the ratliff deal, because i traded philly MY OWN 09 2nd in the aldridge deal

Nevermind, I have changed my trade to have the Utah 2008 second going to Atlanta instead.

As for the 2009 philly pick promise, I'll deal with the league office on it privately

[LeQuitterNotMVP]

This deal shouldn't be vetoed. The Cliippers receive a better player than Kaman in Johnson. Sure, Barganani has been a bust, but the Clips are buying low on him in this case. Maggette will probably walk in the offseason, so why should the Clips hold onto him? There's also some serious Kaman overrating going on here.

[loflin3hree5ive]

This deal shouldn't be vetoed. The Cliippers receive a better player than Kaman in Johnson. Sure, Barganani has been a bust, but the Clips are buying low on him in this case. Maggette will probably walk in the offseason, so why should the Clips hold onto him? There's also some serious Kaman overrating going on here.

Thank you.

[roseorbust]

If I get another traded vetoed I'm quitting this (Please Use More Appropriate Word) league.

Wow, glad to see we have such great mods here, who create ultimatums when people try to make sure all is fair, if you can't deal with having a deal be vetoed, quit now.

[clydestudent1276]

I am going to vote for a non veto. Its hard to judge the value of Johnson since he is having somewhat of an off year, and Kaman because he gets more invovled without Brand around. But with Maggette probably walking and a getting rid of Tim Thomas's deal, this seems like a decent trade to me.

That makes it three non-veto votes. Therefore the trade is approved.

[clydestudent1276]

FYI from now on there will be no votes for vetoing. If you feel a trade is veto worthy you send an email. If Bryant and I recieve three or more veto emails we will look into the deal and decide on a deal to deal basis. You must email within 18 hours of the trade being posted. Any questions about this new method please email one of us.

[zong]

FYI from now on there will be no votes for vetoing. If you feel a trade is veto worthy you send an email. If Bryant and I recieve three or more veto emails we will look into the deal and decide on a deal to deal basis. Any questions about this new method please email one of us.

before all this gets out of hand, i dont think its very fair for the teams involved in that trade to get scrutinized as such in a way like "under inspection" this puts improper pressure on people wanting to state their ideas, since one of the ppl involved is in the "league office" what makes this trade more special than others that it deserves "a public vote"?

[bryant08]

-= original quote snipped =-



before all this gets out of hand, i dont think its very fair for the teams involved in that trade to get scrutinized as such in a way like "under inspection" this puts improper pressure on people wanting to state their ideas, since one of the ppl involved is in the "league office" what makes this trade more special than others that it deserves "a public vote"?

Clyde could have decided on his own, but he took it upon himself to come up with a better solution since their DEFINITELY would have been backlash either way.

[#1knickfan]

-= original quote snipped =-

Wow, glad to see we have such great mods here, who create ultimatums when people try to make sure all is fair, if you can't deal with having a deal be vetoed, quit now.

I don't think the problem is with the vetoes per say. The problem is that the vetoes are stupid. Vetoes are meant to less teams from getting hosed but they are never used for those purposes. If the Spurs GM decides to trade Tim Duncan for Stephon Marbury and Wilson Chandler then that deal should be vetoed. But this Clippers deal? Please. Much worse deals have been made in real life. This one is actually fair.

[deviljets7]

-= original quote snipped =-



I don't think the problem is with the vetoes per say. The problem is that the vetoes are stupid. Vetoes are meant to less teams from getting hosed but they are never used for those purposes. If the Spurs GM decides to trade Tim Duncan for Stephon Marbury and Wilson Chandler then that deal should be vetoed. But this Clippers deal? Please. Much worse deals have been made in real life. This one is actually fair.

Agreed, I think some people have been way to quick pull to veto deals in general, this one included.

[Raptors90102]

-= original quote snipped =-



I don't think the problem is with the vetoes per say. The problem is that the vetoes are stupid. Vetoes are meant to less teams from getting hosed but they are never used for those purposes. If the Spurs GM decides to trade Tim Duncan for Stephon Marbury and Wilson Chandler then that deal should be vetoed. But this Clippers deal? Please. Much worse deals have been made in real life. This one is actually fair.

dont tell me u offered steph and chandler for duncan..

[bryant08]

I don't think anyone remembered this rule incl. myself, but if you send us a veto via e-mail, and that deal doesn't receive 3 vetoes within 18 hours of both parties accepting, you lose your right to veto. Since it doesn't seem people were aware of that for these past deals, we'll start it from now on.

[#1knickfan]

-= original quote snipped =-



dont tell me u offered steph and chandler for duncan..

Nah because even if he accepted it I knew people on this board wouldn't let me get away with it.

[bryant08]

Utah-ATL deal approved.

[skorff26]

delete

[bryant08]

I don't see Kosta Perovic on GS roster. If he was waived or unsigned in the D League. Minnesota would like to sign him.

I believe Golden State still has his rights in the D League.

[b_roy7]

Was the ORL-NJ deal approved?

[Garmfay]

Sorry I forgot to put Perovic on my roster. It's updated. Sorry

[bryant08]

Was the ORL-NJ deal approved?

My bad, it seems I never accepted it, but it is.