could any team go 82-0 if..................

That Nicka · Post #21 » by **That Nicka** » Wed Mar 12, 2008 1:28 am

5DOM wrote:i overestimated your math skills

og15 wrote:Why would he average more points on a better team?

I was thinking the same thing...

JoshB914 · Post #22 » by **JoshB914** » Wed Mar 12, 2008 1:34 am

_BBIB_ · Post #23 » by **_BBIB_** » Wed Mar 12, 2008 2:35 am

I can't believe people are serious about this.

There is no NBA team that is that much better than another NBA team where even in the face of the laws of averages that it beats that team 82 straight games.

Sure maybe a college/HS team could go 0-82, but come on.

Post #24 » by **Young_Star11** » Wed Mar 12, 2008 3:24 am

This is basically another Knick-hate thread.

Lock?

Moses_Malone95 · Post #25 » by **Moses_Malone95** » Wed Mar 12, 2008 3:45 am

Any team in this league? No, because the Knicks aren't the worst team. If an all-time team played them, then perhaps, but I doubt it. Players aren't perfect. You need a season like the NFL's in order to have undefeated records.

Hard2dhole · Post #26 » by **Hard2dhole** » Wed Mar 12, 2008 4:05 am

But it's so much fun to hate on the NY Bricks.

GJense4181 · Post #27 » by **GJense4181** » Wed Mar 12, 2008 4:25 am

You could take the All-NBA team and it wouldn't go undefeated against the Knicks for 82 games.
and I mean that.

CircleCitysportsfan · Post #28 » by **CircleCitysportsfan** » Wed Mar 12, 2008 4:52 am

It's the 95-96 Bulls you should be talking about...they were the team that won 70 (and got beat by the pacers twice

)

High 5 · Post #29 » by **High 5** » Wed Mar 12, 2008 5:09 am

It's not like all of the Knicks wins came against the Knicks.

Jemini80 · Post #30 » by **Jemini80** » Wed Mar 12, 2008 6:28 am

TheKingNbooby wrote:Naw Craw would be hot which means he ll drop 100. I really like crawford and think he gets to much hate, on a better team hes a 25 PPG player

right, I mean on a better team he would be able to play even more minutes per game than he currently does (41 per game, 2nd most in the league), and he would also be able to shoot even more than now (currently 4th in the league in field goal attempts).

On a real team, Crawford does not start, and is the 6th man off the bench in a Jason Terry-like role, except far less efficient as Terry.

thierry · Post #31 » by **thierry** » Wed Mar 12, 2008 6:46 am

That Nicka wrote:I was thinking the same thing...

I agree with the chuckle, and thinking the same thing. My exact thoughts in fact.

thierry · Post #32 » by **thierry** » Wed Mar 12, 2008 6:47 am

Jemini80 wrote:On a real team, Crawford does not start, and is the 6th man off the bench in a Jason Terry-like role, except far less efficient as Terry.

I disagree with Terry being better than Crawford. I think Crawford would be 2nd/3rd as 6th man, him and Barbosa would be at the same level with Manu clearly ahead.

Post #33 » by **NO-KG-AI** » Wed Mar 12, 2008 8:58 am

ok fellas, you had your fun :lol: