Basically they've ranked each team by position, which includes the starter + back-ups. I found it interesting because it gives you an idea of where certain teams need to improve, such as the Bucks who are pathetic across the board...
Position - Rank
PG - 24
SG - 16
SF - 24
PF - 29
C - 18
Compare this to a successful team, like the Jazz for example:
PG - 4
SG - 18
SF - 8
PF - 3
C - 13
So their weakest position would be the Bucks second best
. I guess it confirms alot of peoples thinking, that for all the coaching chances and moronically insignificant roster additions (Voshkul, Storey etc), the fact of the matter is that the Bucks playing roster just isn't that good. While this isn't just the starters (I would be interested to see that too) it shows how important depth is in this day and age, which is something the Bucks lack significantly.
