Shaq (2004-2005) or Dwight Howard (Right now)
Moderators: Clyde Frazier, Doctor MJ, trex_8063, penbeast0, PaulieWal
Shaq (2004-2005) or Dwight Howard (Right now)
-
- Lead Assistant
- Posts: 4,939
- And1: 3
- Joined: Aug 26, 2006
Shaq (2004-2005) or Dwight Howard (Right now)
Who was the better player? That was the year Shaq was pretty much healthy, playing in 73 games. Many felt he should've won MVP over Nash that year, leading the Heat to 59 wins.
Shaq (2004-2005)
22.9ppg
10.4rpg
2.7apg
2.3bpg
0.5spg
2.8topg
3.6fpg
34.1mpg
60.1%FG
46.1%FT
58.3%TS
60.1%eFG
27PER
Dwight (2007-2008)
21.7ppg
14.4rpg
1.3apg
2.3bpg
1.0spg
3.3topg
3.3fpg
38.6mpg
60.0%FG
59.3%FT
62.2%TS
60.0%eFG
23.9PER
Personally, I've got Shaq. He seemed to have a much greater impact on games.
Shaq (2004-2005)
22.9ppg
10.4rpg
2.7apg
2.3bpg
0.5spg
2.8topg
3.6fpg
34.1mpg
60.1%FG
46.1%FT
58.3%TS
60.1%eFG
27PER
Dwight (2007-2008)
21.7ppg
14.4rpg
1.3apg
2.3bpg
1.0spg
3.3topg
3.3fpg
38.6mpg
60.0%FG
59.3%FT
62.2%TS
60.0%eFG
23.9PER
Personally, I've got Shaq. He seemed to have a much greater impact on games.

-
- Banned User
- Posts: 6,437
- And1: 2
- Joined: Oct 29, 2007
Shaq just takes role players and makes them good players, takes good players and makes them superstars, and he is not guardable because of his passing ability. I don't really see why having less fouls is a good thing, I mean as long as it isn't around 4 per game, fouling isn't bad. Especially when you are a big man because you are making people pay for coming into the paint. If he averaged more offensive fouls per game, that would be bad because those are useless.
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 23,617
- And1: 198
- Joined: Jun 29, 2005
- Location: Welcome back the Comeback King !
kooldude wrote:easily Shaq for me
Dwight Howard on his FT struggles:
"I just think everybody needs to stop talking about it," Howard said. "There's more to life than free throws."
- CB4MiamiHeat
- General Manager
- Posts: 8,694
- And1: 2
- Joined: Jun 13, 2004
are we counting playoffs? cause he let me down that season in the playoffs..
I actually take Dwight, for all the talk about Shaq making his teammates better..Dwight is doing that too, players are cheating on him, leaving enough space for 3s..Orlando is one of the best 3pt shooting teams. The rebounding difference is huge.
I actually take Dwight, for all the talk about Shaq making his teammates better..Dwight is doing that too, players are cheating on him, leaving enough space for 3s..Orlando is one of the best 3pt shooting teams. The rebounding difference is huge.
- TheKingOfVa360
- General Manager
- Posts: 8,326
- And1: 1,663
- Joined: Jun 27, 2006
- Location: Orange County, California
-
- Flash3
- Retired Mod
- Posts: 52,635
- And1: 403
- Joined: Oct 21, 2004
- Location: L-I-M-R
:rofl: You can't be serious.Jemini80 wrote:Shaq just takes role players and makes them good players, takes good players and makes them superstars, and he is not guardable because of his passing ability. I don't really see why having less fouls is a good thing, I mean as long as it isn't around 4 per game, fouling isn't bad. Especially when you are a big man because you are making people pay for coming into the paint. If he averaged more offensive fouls per game, that would be bad because those are useless.
There is no way Shaq made Eddie Jones or Nick Van Exel, for example (good players, across many opinions) a superstar.
Mars wrote:You can't stop the asterisk... you can only hope to contain it.
- Flash3
- Retired Mod
- Posts: 52,635
- And1: 403
- Joined: Oct 21, 2004
- Location: L-I-M-R
Shaq was great during the regular season for us, but when it came to the post-season he was hurt, and didn't produce at nearly the same rate/pace as he did in the regular season, even missing crucial playoff games.
I didn't realize just how good Dwight's stats are this season, until now. Wow.
I didn't realize just how good Dwight's stats are this season, until now. Wow.

Mars wrote:You can't stop the asterisk... you can only hope to contain it.