ImageImage

Kohl defends why he declined the Randolph Trade...

Moderators: MickeyDavis, paulpressey25

Ruzious
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 47,909
And1: 11,582
Joined: Jul 17, 2001
       

 

Post#41 » by Ruzious » Sun Mar 23, 2008 6:20 pm

adamcz wrote:Yeah, that's the argument against it, and the argument for it is that Randolph is a much better player than anyone we were sending back. In the end I don't care whether we made the deal, but have a problem with not allowing the GM to make whatever trades he pleases involving our garbage players.

The major argument against it is that Randolph is a proven losing player. But I concur - you have to let GMs GM
LISTEN2JAZZ
RealGM
Posts: 13,295
And1: 196
Joined: Feb 21, 2005
Location: Madison
 

 

Post#42 » by LISTEN2JAZZ » Sun Mar 23, 2008 7:30 pm

Ruzious wrote:The major argument against it is that Randolph is a proven losing player.
Even compared to Bobby Simmons and Dan Gadzuric? I've got to strongly disagree with you.

Return to Milwaukee Bucks