F-Yeah... Trade that man to the Cavs...
A. Because IMO he's a better fit than Redd (and I would prefer him over Redd because I think he's the better player)
B. So he quits kicking our ass...
Trade Mo to the Cavs.
Moderators: MickeyDavis, paulpressey25
-
NeedsMoreCheese
- RealGM
- Posts: 43,042
- And1: 8,369
- Joined: Apr 22, 2002
-
-
trwi7
- RealGM
- Posts: 111,686
- And1: 27,269
- Joined: Jul 12, 2006
- Location: Aussie bias
-
europa wrote:The Cavs don't have anything I'd want for Redd, much less for Mo.
I would trade both to the Cavs for that LeBron fellow.
stellation wrote:What's the difference between Gery Woelful and this glass of mineral water? The mineral water actually has a source."
I Hate Manure wrote:We look to be awful next season without Beasley.
-
LUKE23
- RealGM
- Posts: 72,752
- And1: 6,957
- Joined: May 26, 2005
- Location: Stunville
-
Yeah, Cavs aren't a good trading partner for anyone if the Cavs are looking to land a star or near star player. Simply put, they don't have any pieces many teams want. Snow/Jones/Smith/Ilgauskas are all nearing the end of their careers, Wally is one-dimensional and overpaid, Varejao/West/Gibson are bench players on good teams, and Wallace is a shell of his former self and overpaid.
There isn't one guy on the roster that is either a guy you could see blossoming into a star, or a guy that is a great contract you can add as a role player.
There isn't one guy on the roster that is either a guy you could see blossoming into a star, or a guy that is a great contract you can add as a role player.