ImageImage

Willing to give the backcourt another chance??

Moderators: MickeyDavis, paulpressey25

Max Green
RealGM
Posts: 16,324
And1: 4,715
Joined: Jul 04, 2007
Location: Heelville
 

Willing to give the backcourt another chance?? 

Post#1 » by Max Green » Mon Mar 24, 2008 10:59 pm

I know the majority of people here want either Mo, Redd or both gone. There's a alot of valid reasons that have been posted as far as trading both, citing there defense, chuckem's style of play, low IQ, etc... But when they play up to ability there one of the best starting backcourts in the NBA. Given they both make some tweaks to there game, like showing a renewed effort on defense, running and letting the offense come to them, (Which I think will happen if we bring in the right GM and a good coach) I'm willing to give them another chance and I would like to keep both instead of trading them.

My question is, what would it take for them and the Bucks organization to do for you to be willing to Mo & Redd another chance to be our starting backcourt next year??
User avatar
Fort Minor
Lead Assistant
Posts: 4,722
And1: 70
Joined: Sep 29, 2005
       

 

Post#2 » by Fort Minor » Mon Mar 24, 2008 11:01 pm

Defend at an above average level. Every night.

So no, I don't see tem ever making me want to give the duo together another chance. The only way I'd give either of them a chance is if one of them is shipped out.
BuckPack wrote:People still listen to Gery?
jbone
Senior
Posts: 560
And1: 0
Joined: May 28, 2006

 

Post#3 » by jbone » Mon Mar 24, 2008 11:03 pm

greg pappovich for HC.

thats the only man who could get either of them to play a lick of D
User avatar
ReasonablySober
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 107,000
And1: 41,504
Joined: Dec 02, 2001
Location: Cheap dinner. Watch basketball. Bone down.
Contact:

 

Post#4 » by ReasonablySober » Mon Mar 24, 2008 11:11 pm

I don't particularly care for much of what I hear on ESPN radio, but I was listening over lunch today and Tim Legler was discussing something I've been saying here for years: a team's defends only as well as its star player. He cited the Nugs. They've got an All-NBA defender in Camby but as a team they defend like crap because their two stars, Iverson and 'Melo, basically could give a **** on that end. When the stars won't defend, how can they get on guys like Kleiza and Smith and Carter when they don't either?

The Bucks need that star player, and one that is willing to defend. It's why I don't understand the love for Collison or Smith or other role players in this upcoming draft. Unless one of them ends up an All-NBA type, their defense won't amount to much when nobody else wants to commit on that end.

I'd do whatever it took to land that stud we need. If it's at PG (Rose) then hope for the #2 or trade up. If it's Mayo, do the same. Neither are outstanding on that end, but they're better than what we have and both have the potential to be stars IMO.
User avatar
BuckFan25226
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,707
And1: 1,091
Joined: Jan 30, 2006
Location: Wauwatosa, WI

 

Post#5 » by BuckFan25226 » Mon Mar 24, 2008 11:13 pm

No.
"didnt you watch the game with the raptors?bucks is also a playoff team ,they have enough ability to find wins from dalas and utach,
blow jazzs bitches and mavericks bitches out !"

- yiyiyi
User avatar
jerrod
RealGM
Posts: 34,178
And1: 133
Joined: Aug 31, 2003
Location: The Berkeley of the midwest/ born with the intent/ to distress any government/ right of the left
     

 

Post#6 » by jerrod » Mon Mar 24, 2008 11:15 pm

i'd be ok with both back if we brought in a respected defensive oriented coach and added a good defender at the 4 or 3.

otherwise i think redd should bounce
User avatar
THE DINJ
Starter
Posts: 2,005
And1: 121
Joined: Jun 25, 2006
Location: Madison, WI
   

 

Post#7 » by THE DINJ » Mon Mar 24, 2008 11:16 pm

Get an actual coach in here and you can sign me up.
EastSideBucksFan
RealGM
Posts: 18,710
And1: 4,490
Joined: Jan 31, 2006
Contact:
 

 

Post#8 » by EastSideBucksFan » Mon Mar 24, 2008 11:17 pm

I'm definitely willing to give Mo and Redd another shot at playing together.


BUT, it's going to take at least two things to happen.


1) An experienced head coach that they will listen to.

2) A stud defensively at the 3 spot. Shawn Marion would be perfect, although I doubt we have what it takes to get him (that we're willing to give up)
Andrew34r
Assistant Coach
Posts: 3,831
And1: 2
Joined: Mar 17, 2006
Location: AZ
     

 

Post#9 » by Andrew34r » Mon Mar 24, 2008 11:17 pm

This season was their last chance as far as im concerned...there is basically nothing that can be done where I wouldnt think they need to be broken up.

And this is coming from a guy who defended them up until about the mid-way point this year. Im done with the pair. I would be okay with keeping one of them. And I also think whatever team that the other one goes to will benefit from having one of those two on their team. They are very talented players but just a terrible combo together as everyone by now should know.
User avatar
jerrod
RealGM
Posts: 34,178
And1: 133
Joined: Aug 31, 2003
Location: The Berkeley of the midwest/ born with the intent/ to distress any government/ right of the left
     

 

Post#10 » by jerrod » Tue Mar 25, 2008 12:03 am

EastSideBucksFan wrote:I'm definitely willing to give Mo and Redd another shot at playing together.


BUT, it's going to take at least two things to happen.


1) An experienced head coach that they will listen to.

2) A stud defensively at the 3 spot. Shawn Marion would be perfect, although I doubt we have what it takes to get him (that we're willing to give up)



man, you totally copied my answer :o
LISTEN2JAZZ
RealGM
Posts: 13,295
And1: 196
Joined: Feb 21, 2005
Location: Madison
 

 

Post#11 » by LISTEN2JAZZ » Tue Mar 25, 2008 12:18 am

Stupidity is doing the same thing over and over while expecting different results.
User avatar
jerrod
RealGM
Posts: 34,178
And1: 133
Joined: Aug 31, 2003
Location: The Berkeley of the midwest/ born with the intent/ to distress any government/ right of the left
     

 

Post#12 » by jerrod » Tue Mar 25, 2008 12:19 am

adamcz wrote:Stupidity is doing the same thing over and over while expecting different results.



i think that's insanity


one of those is kind of insulting
User avatar
LUKE23
RealGM
Posts: 72,752
And1: 6,957
Joined: May 26, 2005
Location: Stunville
       

 

Post#13 » by LUKE23 » Tue Mar 25, 2008 12:21 am

Yeah, that is insanity, but stupidity wouldn't be very far behind if they keep the backcourt together. I see no possible way it can work.
User avatar
europa
RealGM
Posts: 44,919
And1: 471
Joined: Jun 25, 2005
Location: Right Behind You

 

Post#14 » by europa » Tue Mar 25, 2008 12:23 am

The best the Bucks can do with Redd as a starter is be a fringe playoff team.

The best the Bucks can do with Mo as a starter is be a lottery team.

It's time to aim higher.
Nothing will not break me.
El Duderino
RealGM
Posts: 20,545
And1: 1,328
Joined: May 30, 2005
Location: Working on pad level

 

Post#15 » by El Duderino » Tue Mar 25, 2008 12:28 am

adamcz wrote:Stupidity is doing the same thing over and over while expecting different results.


Well said adam
LISTEN2JAZZ
RealGM
Posts: 13,295
And1: 196
Joined: Feb 21, 2005
Location: Madison
 

 

Post#16 » by LISTEN2JAZZ » Tue Mar 25, 2008 12:31 am

El Duderino wrote:
Well said adam
Thanks, but I got the quote wrong.

:oops:

(good catch, Jerrod and Luke)
User avatar
jerrod
RealGM
Posts: 34,178
And1: 133
Joined: Aug 31, 2003
Location: The Berkeley of the midwest/ born with the intent/ to distress any government/ right of the left
     

 

Post#17 » by jerrod » Tue Mar 25, 2008 12:31 am

that's funny and all, but just to clarify, adding a defender and a new respected coach is not the same thing
Max Green
RealGM
Posts: 16,324
And1: 4,715
Joined: Jul 04, 2007
Location: Heelville
 

 

Post#18 » by Max Green » Tue Mar 25, 2008 12:41 am

jerrod wrote:that's funny and all, but just to clarify, adding a defender and a new respected coach is not the same thing


Exactly. Let's surround them with equal or more talented players along with a good coach and then let's see what happens.
LISTEN2JAZZ
RealGM
Posts: 13,295
And1: 196
Joined: Feb 21, 2005
Location: Madison
 

 

Post#19 » by LISTEN2JAZZ » Tue Mar 25, 2008 12:49 am

How could we possibly afford to pay Mo and Redd $25 million a year plus have more talented players?
Chuck Diesel
RealGM
Posts: 17,587
And1: 11,556
Joined: May 23, 2004

 

Post#20 » by Chuck Diesel » Tue Mar 25, 2008 12:59 am

I'd do a Michael Redd, Charlie Villaneuva deal to NO David West and Mike James

Return to Milwaukee Bucks