If you were an NBA Player...
Moderators: bwgood77, zimpy27, infinite11285, Clav, Domejandro, ken6199, bisme37, Dirk, KingDavid, cupcakesnake
If you were an NBA Player...
- Storm Surge
- General Manager
- Posts: 9,024
- And1: 17
- Joined: Dec 27, 2004
- Location: Houston, TX
- Contact:
If you were an NBA Player...
So you have just come off of your automatic rookie contract, got paid 2.5 million a year. You're an all star already, considered one of the top young talents in the game, on par with other stars like D-Will, LeBron, Paul etc.
You elected not to extend at all during your rookie contract, now you are an FA. Looking at max contracts from a lot of people.
Would you
1. Sign a max deal for 8 years with a losing club in rebuilding mode? Like the Seattle Supersonics?
2. Sign a 3 year MLE(4.5 million per) to play for an already legit title contender, like the Lakers, Spurs, Pistons, or Celtics. Or maybe your favorite team.
3. Go overseas to play in Australia for 50K per year.
You elected not to extend at all during your rookie contract, now you are an FA. Looking at max contracts from a lot of people.
Would you
1. Sign a max deal for 8 years with a losing club in rebuilding mode? Like the Seattle Supersonics?
2. Sign a 3 year MLE(4.5 million per) to play for an already legit title contender, like the Lakers, Spurs, Pistons, or Celtics. Or maybe your favorite team.
3. Go overseas to play in Australia for 50K per year.
-
- Lead Assistant
- Posts: 5,718
- And1: 45
- Joined: May 05, 2007
-
- Banned User
- Posts: 823
- And1: 0
- Joined: Mar 16, 2008
- Philly Fresh
- Senior
- Posts: 543
- And1: 2
- Joined: Sep 09, 2007
- nate33
- Forum Mod - Wizards
- Posts: 69,907
- And1: 22,319
- Joined: Oct 28, 2002
They don't have 8-year contracts. If I am an unrestricted free agent, I can sign a contract with a maximum length of 5-years (6 if I'm resigning with my own team).
In your hypothetical, I would look for option three: a shorter contract for less than max money but more than the MLE, even if it's a losing team. I wouldn't mind losing for 3-5 years, but I wouldn't want to be locked into a contract with a horrible franchise for the entire prime of my career.
In your hypothetical, I would look for option three: a shorter contract for less than max money but more than the MLE, even if it's a losing team. I wouldn't mind losing for 3-5 years, but I wouldn't want to be locked into a contract with a horrible franchise for the entire prime of my career.
- HumbleBumbleBee
- Analyst
- Posts: 3,486
- And1: 3
- Joined: Apr 18, 2007
- Location: The city the world calls home
- SabasRevenge!
- Assistant Coach
- Posts: 4,221
- And1: 1
- Joined: Jun 10, 2007
- Location: Portland, OR
I'd either sign for MAX money with my current team or try to work a S+T with another team. Playing for a contender would be nice, but it's not worth making a fraction of the money. If you're that good you should be able to turn your team into a contender with a halfway competent front office. I've got to say though, I'd love to play in NY.
- tracey_nice
- Analyst
- Posts: 3,531
- And1: 274
- Joined: Jan 08, 2008
- Location: PAUUSE
- BrooklynBulls
- Retired Mod
- Posts: 32,734
- And1: 2,655
- Joined: May 13, 2007
- Location: Avidly reading WillPenney.com
- Contact: