ImageImage

Which team you like more?

Moderators: MickeyDavis, paulpressey25

What team you prefer?

Team A
9
39%
Team B
14
61%
 
Total votes: 23

User avatar
Sigra
RealGM
Posts: 15,401
And1: 1,446
Joined: Sep 08, 2005
Location: Aug 02, 2002
     

Which team you like more? 

Post#1 » by Sigra » Sat Mar 29, 2008 10:06 pm

Team A: Rose, Raja Bell, Diaw, Yi, Bogut

Team B: Lowry, Mayo, Artest, Brand, Bogut (team from my sig)


How we get Team A:
If Miami get #2 pick then we trade Mo, CV and #7 pick for #2 pick and fillers. Then we draft Rose and then we trade Redd for Bell and Diaw


How we get Team B:
We draft Mayo with our pick (if we are that lucky). Then we trade Redd and Yi for Brand, Mo for Artest and CV for Lowry.


I was thinking about this 2 ways to reshape this team but I can't decide which one I like more. Your thoughts?
User avatar
trwi7
RealGM
Posts: 111,686
And1: 27,269
Joined: Jul 12, 2006
Location: Aussie bias
         

 

Post#2 » by trwi7 » Sat Mar 29, 2008 10:07 pm

Team B.
stellation wrote:What's the difference between Gery Woelful and this glass of mineral water? The mineral water actually has a source."


I Hate Manure wrote:We look to be awful next season without Beasley.
User avatar
ReasonablySober
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 107,000
And1: 41,504
Joined: Dec 02, 2001
Location: Cheap dinner. Watch basketball. Bone down.
Contact:

 

Post#3 » by ReasonablySober » Sat Mar 29, 2008 10:10 pm

A. It loses enough to get a top 5 pick next season.

Team B probably wins enough to make the playoffs and get bounced in round 1.
skones
RealGM
Posts: 37,108
And1: 17,267
Joined: Jul 20, 2004

 

Post#4 » by skones » Sat Mar 29, 2008 10:21 pm

I think team B has legit hopes at a conference title. Obviously B.
User avatar
WEFFPIM
RealGM
Posts: 38,521
And1: 473
Joined: Nov 14, 2005
Location: WEFFPIM. I'm the real WEFFPIM.
   

 

Post#5 » by WEFFPIM » Sat Mar 29, 2008 10:40 pm

skones wrote:I think team B has legit hopes at a conference title. Obviously B.


WHAT?
ReddWing wrote:Being a fan of this team is tantamount to being in hell...There is no Christ that is coming to save us. Even if there was, we'd trade him for a 28 year old wing.
xTitan
RealGM
Posts: 17,135
And1: 2,283
Joined: Mar 03, 2006
     

 

Post#6 » by xTitan » Sat Mar 29, 2008 10:58 pm

Even though I don't see Team b as being a viable option at all.....A would easily be the choice.
Max Green
RealGM
Posts: 16,324
And1: 4,715
Joined: Jul 04, 2007
Location: Heelville
 

 

Post#7 » by Max Green » Sat Mar 29, 2008 11:23 pm

Team B and it ain't even close.
Vice President of Parker-Nation.
#Jabariunleashed
#OwnTheFuture
:wizard: Maxtradamus
User avatar
SheedsWeed
RealGM
Posts: 12,931
And1: 0
Joined: Jul 30, 2004
Location: to all the killas and the hundred dolla billas
Contact:

 

Post#8 » by SheedsWeed » Sat Mar 29, 2008 11:49 pm

Team B.
User avatar
bigkurty
General Manager
Posts: 8,212
And1: 1,511
Joined: Apr 23, 2005
Location: Gilbert, AZ
     

 

Post#9 » by bigkurty » Sun Mar 30, 2008 12:01 am

I prefer B since I think it has more championship potential so that is what I picked. However, I think pulling all that off is unlikely since it is so many trades and anything can go wrong along the way. I actually think A can happen pretty easily though and I would love that team as well. What would be really sweet is if we could win the lottery or at least the second pick and then getting Rose or possibly Beasley without trading for him. From there you can still do the Redd Trade and maybe unload Bobby, Simmons, Mo, CV, and Yi. With those 4 players and maybe a future draft pick, you might still be able to get some combo of Brand, Haslem, Lowry and/or Artest and have a line up like

Rose (our draft pick)
Raja (Redd)
Diaw (Redd)
Haslem (Mo)
Bogut

and Lowry as a backup PG for CV, and still have Yi or else

Lowry (CV)
Artest (Mo)
Beasley (our draft pick)
Brand (Redd and Yi)
Bogut

Really when you think about it, if we could somehow get a top 2 pick, we have a ton of options and could change the whole team pretty easily and get good rather quick provided the Cronies allow it and the other teams actually make these trades with us.
User avatar
Nowak008
RealGM
Posts: 14,588
And1: 4,303
Joined: Jul 07, 2006
Location: Book Publisher
Contact:

 

Post#10 » by Nowak008 » Sun Mar 30, 2008 12:17 am

I wonder if Miami would consider the #2 pick for Mo/CV +#7. I doubt that they would, but that would be awesome. Then we could deal Redd to the clips for their pick and get Mayo. :nod:
Image
John Hammond apologists:
emunney wrote:
Ron Swanson wrote: 9 YEARS!? like any of that matters


THAT LITERALLY IS HIS TENURE.
bucksbrewerspackersfan
Pro Prospect
Posts: 892
And1: 2
Joined: Jul 12, 2005
Location: Glendale
Contact:

 

Post#11 » by bucksbrewerspackersfan » Sun Mar 30, 2008 1:18 am

If I were Miami I would keep the pick unless it is a great trade and since they don't have Shaq I am sure they would want Bogut. I think Rose and Wade would be a great way to start off a rebuilding process.
User avatar
paul
RealGM
Posts: 32,398
And1: 1,038
Joined: Dec 11, 2007
 

 

Post#12 » by paul » Sun Mar 30, 2008 1:48 am

B for me
heynow
Pro Prospect
Posts: 893
And1: 0
Joined: Dec 22, 2005

 

Post#13 » by heynow » Sun Mar 30, 2008 1:52 am

I like team B.
However it would take the GM equivalent of Super Fly to put that roster together.

I just don't see how the Bucks have the pieces in place to bring back Brand and Artest.
User avatar
paulpressey25
Senior Mod - Bucks
Senior Mod - Bucks
Posts: 62,522
And1: 29,525
Joined: Oct 27, 2002
     

 

Post#14 » by paulpressey25 » Sun Mar 30, 2008 2:10 am

I'd take team A.....

Rose has a chance to be a superstar PG. I'd take that over anything else. Plus even though Yi is sucking, we also keep him with Team A.

Elton Brand might be Lt. Dan next year.....Artest is getting older and is nuts.....Sure I'd take them both on my team. But I'd rather have Rose than either of them if that is my choice.
In depth discussions here - shorter stuff on Twitter

https://twitter.com/paulpressey25
User avatar
jerrod
RealGM
Posts: 34,178
And1: 133
Joined: Aug 31, 2003
Location: The Berkeley of the midwest/ born with the intent/ to distress any government/ right of the left
     

 

Post#15 » by jerrod » Sun Mar 30, 2008 2:15 am

paulpressey25 wrote:I'd take team A.....

Rose has a chance to be a superstar PG. I'd take that over anything else. Plus even though Yi is sucking, we also keep him with Team A.

Elton Brand might be Lt. Dan next year.....Artest is getting older and is nuts.....Sure I'd take them both on my team. But I'd rather have Rose than either of them if that is my choice.



this is kinda how i feel

basically to me it comes down to brand's health, if he's the brand of the last few years than i'll take b, if not i'll go with a
User avatar
paul
RealGM
Posts: 32,398
And1: 1,038
Joined: Dec 11, 2007
 

 

Post#16 » by paul » Sun Mar 30, 2008 2:20 am

jerrod wrote:-= original quote snipped =-




this is kinda how i feel

basically to me it comes down to brand's health, if he's the brand of the last few years than i'll take b, if not i'll go with a


Agreed, it's tough to know how he'll come back.
skones
RealGM
Posts: 37,108
And1: 17,267
Joined: Jul 20, 2004

 

Post#17 » by skones » Sun Mar 30, 2008 2:32 am

WEFFPIM wrote:-= original quote snipped =-



WHAT?


I THINK TEAM B HAS THE POTENTIAL TO WIN A CONFERENCE TITLE. Easier to understand?
User avatar
WEFFPIM
RealGM
Posts: 38,521
And1: 473
Joined: Nov 14, 2005
Location: WEFFPIM. I'm the real WEFFPIM.
   

 

Post#18 » by WEFFPIM » Sun Mar 30, 2008 2:41 am

skones wrote:I THINK TEAM B HAS THE POTENTIAL TO WIN A CONFERENCE TITLE. Easier to understand?


Oh, I heard you. I was just making sure you heard you.
ReddWing wrote:Being a fan of this team is tantamount to being in hell...There is no Christ that is coming to save us. Even if there was, we'd trade him for a 28 year old wing.
skones
RealGM
Posts: 37,108
And1: 17,267
Joined: Jul 20, 2004

 

Post#19 » by skones » Sun Mar 30, 2008 2:43 am

WEFFPIM wrote:-= original quote snipped =-



Oh, I heard you. I was just making sure you heard you.


How is that so out of the question? Your team has good defenders one through five, while still being able to put the ball in the hoop. We're in the east in case you haven't noticed. Name some lineups in the east that are better than that. Better yet, there are very few starting lineups in the entire league that are that good.
User avatar
WEFFPIM
RealGM
Posts: 38,521
And1: 473
Joined: Nov 14, 2005
Location: WEFFPIM. I'm the real WEFFPIM.
   

 

Post#20 » by WEFFPIM » Sun Mar 30, 2008 2:47 am

skones wrote:How is that so out of the question? Your team has good defenders one through five, while still being able to put the ball in the hoop. We're in the east in case you haven't noticed. Name some lineups in the east that are better than that. Better yet, there are very few starting lineups in the entire league that are that good.


I can think of 10 teams in the West already, and at least 4 in the East. Team B would be a playoff team, but an Eastern Conference Finals team is a stretch in my mind.
ReddWing wrote:Being a fan of this team is tantamount to being in hell...There is no Christ that is coming to save us. Even if there was, we'd trade him for a 28 year old wing.

Return to Milwaukee Bucks