Atlanta Hawks

TheCelticTruth · Post #41 » by **TheCelticTruth** » Wed Apr 2, 2008 3:56 am

yeah man, there are a lot of haters and morons on realgm, not as bad as some of the other boards i see (like espn underneath articles, or like boston.com when i go on to read the newspaper)

i call 'em like i see 'em, which can be harsh at times, but i think the hawks have a more definitive future than the heat for example. no you dont have a wade, but they dont know whats gonna happen with the matrix, and you know youve got smith and horford to build around, plus some moveable pieces. i think bibbs is mostly washed up, but hes definitely refreshed playing for you, so hopefully you can stretch that out until acie is ready (i think hell be good, the guy is clutch)..or just read wiretap, if you have enough money to sign felton. you guys traded your pick this year right, cuz lawson might be an even better fit with the way you like to run

nice rafer sig BTW

Oomph · Post #42 » by **Oomph** » Wed Apr 2, 2008 10:10 am

Don't count the Pacers out so quickly, they are the only team capable of catching the Hawks for the #8 spot. Especially with JO back in action tonight's game against Indy will be a serious test.

GO PACERS!

cfan79 · Post #43 » by **cfan79** » Wed Apr 2, 2008 1:47 pm

Oomph wrote:Don't count the Pacers out so quickly, they are the only team capable of catching the Hawks for the #8 spot. Especially with JO back in action tonight's game against Indy will be a serious test.

GO PACERS!

I think the Hawks got the 8th seed. Indy's catching fire a little too late.

Hood President · Post #44 » by **Hood President** » Wed Apr 2, 2008 3:40 pm

yall will dismantle indy if yall played them. who is there number 1 option...danny granger?(no disrespect). or jermaine onel who just came back from injury and is past his prime.

cfan79 · Post #45 » by **cfan79** » Wed Apr 2, 2008 3:47 pm

Hood President wrote:yall will dismantle indy if yall played them. who is there number 1 option...danny granger?(no disrespect). or jermaine onel who just came back from injury and is past his prime.

Thanks, we just happened to be playing them tonight. They've got some nice roleplayers. Grangers actually a decent young player. Their point guard position is pretty bad though.

Hood President · Post #46 » by **Hood President** » Wed Apr 2, 2008 3:50 pm

cfan79 wrote:-= original quote snipped =-

Thanks, we just happened to be playing them tonight. They've got some nice roleplayers. Grangers actually a pretty decent young.

yeah granger is my dude. they got some role players like dunleavy, rush....i cant think of anymore. but there not going to make the playoffs.

cfan79 · Post #47 » by **cfan79** » Wed Apr 2, 2008 3:51 pm

Hood President wrote:yeah granger is my dude. they got some role players like dunleavy, rush....i cant think of anymore. but there not going to make the playoffs.

Definitely not this year. I really dislike Tinsley. He seems like he doesn't give a consistent effort. Some nights he looks great while others he looks like a d-leaguer.

Hood President · Post #48 » by **Hood President** » Wed Apr 2, 2008 4:26 pm

cfan79 wrote:-= original quote snipped =-

Definitely not this year. I really dislike Tinsley. He seems like he doesn't give a consistent effort. Some nights he looks great while others he looks like a d-leaguer.

did you see the phx game tinsley chucked in?

cfan79 · Post #49 » by **cfan79** » Wed Apr 2, 2008 8:27 pm

Hood President wrote:
did you see the phx game tinsley chucked in?

Nope, I missed it, but it looks like he put up some good numbers in it. Even though he did put up a lot of shots.