David Stern: New Playoff Seeding Next Season

Moderators: bwgood77, zimpy27, infinite11285, Clav, Domejandro, ken6199, bisme37, Dirk, KingDavid, cupcakesnake

CircleCitysportsfan
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,868
And1: 81
Joined: Dec 07, 2004
Location: Hamilton County
Contact:
     

 

Post#41 » by CircleCitysportsfan » Thu Apr 3, 2008 6:17 am

Da-Met wrote:I understand why people want it changed but imo it makes the already-too-long regular season even more yawn-inducing, if the reg season has no bearing on the strategic aspect of seperate East/West bracketing.

In my perfect league, the NBA season would be like 52 games or some such number, with best of 5 playoff series.


So what's going to make up for the millions in dollars in lost revenue??? That's why the season is so long. And it's never changing.


As for the new format, i'd be all for it. This way we get the best 16 teams and the best 2 teams in the finals every year. I wonder if the East vs West matchups would be in the current finals 2-3-2 format????
lovehoops01
General Manager
Posts: 7,878
And1: 1
Joined: Nov 05, 2004
Location: Orlando

 

Post#42 » by lovehoops01 » Thu Apr 3, 2008 7:07 am

It only works if you have winners from both conferences. If the Celtics and Pistons are the only East teams to make it out of the first round and then lose to Western Conference teams, not very many people in the East will watch the playoffs because they will have no vested interest, and the ratings for the Finals and perhaps the semifinals will be worse than they already are.

Plus if the East still has eight teams in the playoffs, they aren't getting any better lottery picks.

Does any other sport do this? No. There's probably a good reason for that.

Why didn't we hear about this when the East teams were dominating? That makes me believe that West teams are behind this change because they believe it benefits them. I see no reason that the teams in the East would be behind it so I don't really expect it to be approved.
Muzzleshot
Rookie
Posts: 1,046
And1: 2
Joined: Oct 31, 2006

 

Post#43 » by Muzzleshot » Thu Apr 3, 2008 11:44 am

Some of you are giving Stern too much power.
Stern marches to the beat of the owners and if the owners don't want this playoff change to take place it won't.
Why would an owner in the east vote for this change when it would make it more difficult for them to make the playoffs in coming years (Indiana, Philly) or make it more difficult for them to get to the Finals (Detroit, Boston)?

The NFL and MLB have had two conferences/leagues meet in the Final game(s) since just about forever. Last time I checked they were both more successful as far as ratings and have had a similar disparity between the two conferences/leagues.
P2
Banned User
Posts: 4,759
And1: 1
Joined: Dec 18, 2006
Location: Beantown

 

Post#44 » by P2 » Thu Apr 3, 2008 12:38 pm

So we would still face the Hawks in the First Round. And it would be harder for the Celtics to get to the Finals, but I still like it.
User avatar
snaquille oatmeal
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 16,821
And1: 4,827
Joined: Nov 15, 2005
Location: San Diego
   

 

Post#45 » by snaquille oatmeal » Thu Apr 3, 2008 2:13 pm

Forum permissions
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot trade for basketball reasons in this forum
You cannot but I can...five rings!
Whateva
Pro Prospect
Posts: 933
And1: 92
Joined: Jun 09, 2006
Location: Spain

 

Post#46 » by Whateva » Thu Apr 3, 2008 2:36 pm

so, all the teams should play against each other the same number of games, regardless the Conference, not just the playoffs but the whole regular season, this way a #5 seed , is a #5 seed in the NBA not just in the East/West. Thats fair now.
Now, teams like Atlanta can to playoffs, while Golden State or Denver are borderline playoff teams in the West.

Return to The General Board