Cammo's Mock Draft (Final 4 Edition)

Draft talk all year round

Moderators: Marcus, Duke4life831

User avatar
evildallas
General Manager
Posts: 9,412
And1: 1
Joined: Aug 11, 2005
Location: in the land of weak ownership
Contact:

 

Post#21 » by evildallas » Tue Apr 1, 2008 1:14 am

If Charlotte gets Joey Dorsey in the 2nd, it would almost make up for their drafting of Sean May as a 1st a couple of years ago. As an Atlanta fan I hope he goes sooner (and I really hate not even having a single pick in the draft).
Going to donkey punch a leprechaun!
User avatar
DmoneyH3
Pro Prospect
Posts: 757
And1: 1
Joined: Apr 08, 2007
     

 

Post#22 » by DmoneyH3 » Tue Apr 1, 2008 1:17 am

Russell Westbrook over Donte Greene for Portland's 1st rounder. We already have Jones and Webster as SF 3 pt specialists.
Image
User avatar
Cammo101
Mr. Mock Draft
Posts: 30,856
And1: 2,011
Joined: Feb 11, 2006
Location: Austin, TX
     

 

Post#23 » by Cammo101 » Tue Apr 1, 2008 1:54 am

DmoneyH3 wrote:Russell Westbrook over Donte Greene for Portland's 1st rounder. We already have Jones and Webster as SF 3 pt specialists.


Donte Greene can be so much more than a 3 point specialist. He could make Portland disgustingly good in a few years if he lives up to his potential.
PacerGuy
Analyst
Posts: 3,126
And1: 0
Joined: Feb 05, 2006
Location: Indy

 

Post#24 » by PacerGuy » Wed Apr 2, 2008 6:34 am

Cammo,
As a Pacer fan, what team do you think might be most willing to trade a 1st Rd. pick. I know it all depends on an offer, but in general, what is the lowest pick that might be had? IN had true need @ PG & PF/C. That said, I still agree if the draft went the way you have it IN would likely pick EG, but we would still have needs.
Larry Bird, You are now on the Clock! ( 3/24/08 )
User avatar
Cammo101
Mr. Mock Draft
Posts: 30,856
And1: 2,011
Joined: Feb 11, 2006
Location: Austin, TX
     

 

Post#25 » by Cammo101 » Wed Apr 2, 2008 6:47 am

PacerGuy wrote:Cammo,
As a Pacer fan, what team do you think might be most willing to trade a 1st Rd. pick. I know it all depends on an offer, but in general, what is the lowest pick that might be had? IN had true need @ PG & PF/C. That said, I still agree if the draft went the way you have it IN would likely pick EG, but we would still have needs.


The bigger question is what exactly does Indy have to offer? Indy could probably trade their pick for both NJ picks and take Collison and Hibbert. Portland's pick is said to be available, though I am not sure Indy has anything they want all that badly. A Dunleavy deal could be possible, but if I had to guess Indy will have a hard time moving up. Trading down and picking up NJ's picks and taking Hibbert and Collison or Love and Collison could be a better route to go for Indy.
cdash
Analyst
Posts: 3,253
And1: 0
Joined: Feb 11, 2008

 

Post#26 » by cdash » Wed Apr 2, 2008 9:50 pm

Hibbert would fit in the Pacers' offense about as well as adding a big chunk of cement to the starting five. I dont really understand how we can trade our pick for both NJ picks, seeing as how their top pick is looking to be better than Indiana's right now..?
DanBlazer
Junior
Posts: 329
And1: 10
Joined: Jun 26, 2007
Location: Sydney

 

Post#27 » by DanBlazer » Thu Apr 3, 2008 7:14 am

Do you think Greene will become a much better player than Martell Webster? Because Martell is a 3pt specialist and I think he is a good athlete but he just isnt used the right way in Portland and doesnt have enough plays run for him. Still, the question I ask is do you believe Greene is enough of an upgrade over Martell to warrant taking him at 13? I havent seen much of him this year but I hear that he still has a lot of room to improve.
User avatar
Cammo101
Mr. Mock Draft
Posts: 30,856
And1: 2,011
Joined: Feb 11, 2006
Location: Austin, TX
     

 

Post#28 » by Cammo101 » Thu Apr 3, 2008 2:31 pm

bigd213 wrote:Do you think Greene will become a much better player than Martell Webster? Because Martell is a 3pt specialist and I think he is a good athlete but he just isnt used the right way in Portland and doesnt have enough plays run for him. Still, the question I ask is do you believe Greene is enough of an upgrade over Martell to warrant taking him at 13? I havent seen much of him this year but I hear that he still has a lot of room to improve.


I think Greene can become a poor man's Rudy Gay.
Goldbum
Analyst
Posts: 3,302
And1: 651
Joined: Jul 12, 2001
Location: Salt Lake City, Utah
     

 

Post#29 » by Goldbum » Fri Apr 4, 2008 7:32 am

Like it as a Blazer fan. Really like the 2nd round, however a poster on the Blazer board with a reliable source said earlier in the year that Pritchard had targetted Bayless and Westbrook so I'm just not sure PDX would pass 0n him.
From Portland to Reno to Vegas to LA to SLC and on to HotLanta. Winning at life. Too Blessed to be Stressed
User avatar
PhilipNelsonFan
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 17,246
And1: 6
Joined: Oct 11, 2004

 

Post#30 » by PhilipNelsonFan » Fri Apr 4, 2008 8:25 am

Goldbum wrote:Like it as a Blazer fan. Really like the 2nd round, however a poster on the Blazer board with a reliable source said earlier in the year that Pritchard had targetted Bayless and Westbrook so I'm just not sure PDX would pass 0n him.


No dude. This draft is too good to pass up. Hickson and Ibaka are excellent prospects and Greene is good if really raw. Pritchard would be very happy with a draft like this even if there's no Bayless and Westbrook. Arguably the best players available were drafted at every spot, and with solid value.
Tim Lehrbach wrote:I will break the Rose Garden.
Ruzious
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 47,909
And1: 11,582
Joined: Jul 17, 2001
       

 

Post#31 » by Ruzious » Fri Apr 4, 2008 2:26 pm

I think it's a good mock.

The 2 things I'd bet on are that Batum will go lower (I think much lower), and Love will go higher.
Goldbum
Analyst
Posts: 3,302
And1: 651
Joined: Jul 12, 2001
Location: Salt Lake City, Utah
     

 

Post#32 » by Goldbum » Sat Apr 5, 2008 11:57 pm

PhilipNelsonFan wrote:-= original quote snipped =-



No dude. This draft is too good to pass up. Hickson and Ibaka are excellent prospects and Greene is good if really raw. Pritchard would be very happy with a draft like this even if there's no Bayless and Westbrook. Arguably the best players available were drafted at every spot, and with solid value.
If you look @ his mock Westbrook is still available and PDX takes Greene. My point was not that we wouldn't want Greene or that would be disappointed with this Draft, just that KP wouldn't take Greene with Westbrook still available.
From Portland to Reno to Vegas to LA to SLC and on to HotLanta. Winning at life. Too Blessed to be Stressed
ahartleyvu
Bench Warmer
Posts: 1,352
And1: 60
Joined: May 01, 2007

 

Post#33 » by ahartleyvu » Sun Apr 6, 2008 12:21 am

Surprised this hasn't been mentioned yet. Augustin 6th!?
DanDanE420
Pro Prospect
Posts: 767
And1: 47
Joined: May 16, 2005

 

Post#34 » by DanDanE420 » Sun Apr 6, 2008 12:36 am

Greene= Tim Thomas. It's almost uncanny.
User avatar
Cammo101
Mr. Mock Draft
Posts: 30,856
And1: 2,011
Joined: Feb 11, 2006
Location: Austin, TX
     

 

Post#35 » by Cammo101 » Sun Apr 6, 2008 1:23 am

Westbrook is by far the most overrated player in this years draft. Undersized SG who plays very out of control. I would take Donte Greene over him 100 times out of 100.
User avatar
RyGuy24
General Manager
Posts: 8,016
And1: 107
Joined: Mar 12, 2004
Location: 48 minutes of Intensity

 

Post#36 » by RyGuy24 » Tue Apr 8, 2008 1:04 am

Cammo101 wrote:Westbrook is by far the most overrated player in this years draft. Undersized SG who plays very out of control. I would take Donte Greene over him 100 times out of 100.


Yeah, take the guy who can't shoot, rebound, defend, or dribble worth a damn. I don't approve of guys who choose to take over half of their attempts as 3's and make them at a terrible %. He's also can't create a lick of offense, and i've seen a bunch of Cuse games. He's extremely slow laterally on D as well, and gets blown by alot unless Cuse is in their zone.
Image
R.I.P Red , Norm, Bullsmaniac, and pdenninggolden.
User avatar
ReasonablySober
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 108,154
And1: 42,403
Joined: Dec 02, 2001
Location: Cheap dinner. Watch basketball. Bone down.
Contact:

 

Post#37 » by ReasonablySober » Tue Apr 8, 2008 1:05 am

Citizen.Eras3d wrote:I hope you're wrong for the Bucks sake.


QFT.
User avatar
Cammo101
Mr. Mock Draft
Posts: 30,856
And1: 2,011
Joined: Feb 11, 2006
Location: Austin, TX
     

 

Post#38 » by Cammo101 » Tue Apr 8, 2008 1:33 am

RyGuy24 wrote:-= original quote snipped =-



Yeah, take the guy who can't shoot, rebound, defend, or dribble worth a damn. I don't approve of guys who choose to take over half of their attempts as 3's and make them at a terrible %. He's also can't create a lick of offense, and i've seen a bunch of Cuse games. He's extremely slow laterally on D as well, and gets blown by alot unless Cuse is in their zone.


This guy was a freshman, cut him a break. These were a lot of the same arguements people had against taking Rudy Gay.
User avatar
Cammo101
Mr. Mock Draft
Posts: 30,856
And1: 2,011
Joined: Feb 11, 2006
Location: Austin, TX
     

 

Post#39 » by Cammo101 » Tue Apr 8, 2008 1:34 am

Citizen.Eras3d wrote:I hope you're wrong for the Bucks sake.


Williams, Redd, Gallinari, Yi, and Bogut would be a good young team IMO. Gallinari will do a lot of the dirty work the rest of those guys won't. He is very underrated by people cause they have not seen much of him.

Return to NBA Draft