Wilt's Team vs Russell's Team, who wins in 7?

Moderators: Clyde Frazier, Doctor MJ, trex_8063, penbeast0, PaulieWal

Wilt's Team vs Russell's Team, who wins in 7?

Wilt's Team
6
40%
Russell's Team
9
60%
 
Total votes: 15

JordansBulls
RealGM
Posts: 60,467
And1: 5,348
Joined: Jul 12, 2006
Location: HCA (Homecourt Advantage)

Re: interesting analysis 

Post#21 » by JordansBulls » Fri Apr 4, 2008 3:34 pm

writerman wrote:
JordansBulls wrote:-= original quote snipped =-


Why wouldn't Russell be able to hold Wilt when he held him to 11.7 ppg in the 1969 finals?


Russell never "handled" Wilt, which he freely admitted. Wilt averaged 26 points and 28 rebounds against Russell, and set the single game NBA record of 55 boards against him.

http://sportscommentary.suite101.com/ar ... ports_myth

"If [the referee] is calling [the game] loose then everyone gets away with more. So, you have to handle your own man accordingly, unless it's Wilt Chamberlain. Him, you just don't handle. He's too strong. The best you can do is make him work hard."
-- Bill Russell, Go up For Glory p.100

Analysis from "A Tribute to Wilt Chamberlain"

Wilt vs. Michael Jordan: Once more, Wilt is simply more dominating. While Jordan fans are quick to point out Wilt's flaw (free throws), I can equally point out that Jordan was not that great of a 3 point shooter, unless the line is moved in (the league's attempt to help inferior players score more).

Jordan averaged 1 asst/game more than Wilt during his career, and this is while he has been enjoying the luxury of looser rules governing assists. Had the rulebook been the same back then as it now, governing assists, this number would be even.

Jordan's took more shots than Wilt, yet both averaged 30.1 ppg during their careers. As far as who was the better scorer, there is no question: During Wilt's first 7 years, he scored like no man in history. Jordan never had a 70+ point game. Wilt had 4. Jordan never averaged 38+ ppg for a season. Wilt did it 3 times. I've seen Jordan make ridiculous claims that Wilt was another Shaq, yet Jordan flaunts his ignorance. Wilt came into the league with a jump shot and used the finger-roll and fade-away as go-to moves, whereas Shaq has never developed these shots and spent years with a very raw offensive game made up of dunks. Wilt was stronger than Shaq, a better leaper, and far more schooled in the fundamentals. Furthermore, Cavs GM Wayne Embry disagrees with Jordan. He says Wilt would have no problems against today's defenses. Nearly every rules change has been made to help the defense. Against these rules, Wilt would clearly dominate.

Jordan was also much more selfish. When Wilt's coaches asked him to score, he did. When they asked him to sacrificed his scoring titles, he did. Jordan fought any attempt to cut back his shot attempts. Read about Jordan's spats with Phil Jackson. Read about how he put down Tex Winter and the triangle! Even his own teammate Horace Grant said that Jordan cared more about his points than the team. If Wilt had that selfish attitude, there is no telling how many more points he would have. Also, if you take Wilt's scoring through the same number of career games, his scoring average is higher.

Wilt is a vastly superior rebounder, and while Jordan fans will point out that "Wilt should have more, since he is a center", I counter that Jordan should have a lot more assists, since he is a guard, but the numbers do not support him. Wilt is one of the greatest passers ever at center, but Jordan isn't as dominating at his position with respect to rebounds (Oscar and Magic, for instance, are both better rebounders). And while Jordan does have more 1st team all defensive selections, keep in mind that #1) the team wasn't created until Wilt's 10th year in the league and #2) Only one center is selected vs. 2 guards. If Jordan were the greatest defensive guard ever, there would be a point, but as long as Walt Frazier is remembered, Jordan could never be better than #2.

Jordan has also received the benefit of rules changes that have been implemented to help offensive players, such as well-defined rules concerning zones, rules against hand checking, and flagrant fouls. He's been spoiled by the luxuries given to the modern player, such as chartered planes, first class hotels, superior athletic shoes, and modern sports medicine (and he still hasn't approached Wilt's minutes per game!). Jordan has benefited from the joke that has become NBA officiating, in which superstars receive preferential treatment, and Jordan has probably received more than any player in history. The steps and the fouls he gets away with are ridiculous!

Consider also that Jordan benefited from the dilution of talent in the 1990s that came from expansion, giving him inferior talent to play against, compared to the 1980s. It is no coincidence that Jordan's teammate, Dennis Rodman, said that the 1996 Bulls could not have won 70 games playing against 1980s teams. While Jordan has many accomplishments, they cannot compare to Wilt's, and while the press and the Jordan radicals try to rationalize Wilt's numbers, as you can see, it's equally easy to rationalize Jordan's, and when it comes down to it, Wilt is still the most dominating player in history, and Jordan has never came close to threatening Wilt's 100 point game or 50.4 PPG average, and scoring is supposed to be Jordan's specialty, let alone Wilt's 8.6 APG in a season, or his rebounding numbers, or his 72.7% field goal percentage.

Finally, consider each player's ability to carry a team. Wilt came into the league and carried a bad team to immediate contention. He took the 1962 Warriors, not a great team, to the 7th game of the conference finals, where they lost by 2 points on a controversial call, to the champion Celtics. Jordan, on the other hand, came into the league and joined a losing team and after 3 years, they were STILL a losing team. He was 1-9 in the playoffs and posted 3 consecutive losing seasons. The truth is, Jordan played 5 seasons without Scottie Pippen and in each of those 5 seasons, he could not win more games than he lost, and in the final 2 years, he failed to get Washington to the playoffs. Yes, he was older than Wilt when Wilt retired, but Wilt played MANY more minutes, because Jordan retired 3 times. The fact is, without great teammates, Jordan was a loser. Wilt, on the other hand, could carry a poor team much farther than Jordan, showing just how much more dominant he was.


What does Jordan have to do with this?

If you want to go that route, let's go.

As far as scoring is concerned

ALL-TIME SCORING RECORDS:
1st Place: MJ, 22 scoring records
2nd Place: Wilt, 18 scoring records

- Highest career scoring average: MJ 30.12
- Highest career playoff scoring average: MJ 33.4
- Highest career Finals scoring average: MJ 33.6 (min. 15 games)
- Highest single season scoring average: Wilt 50.4
- Highest single season playoff average: West 40.6
- Highest single series playoff average: West 46.3
- Highest single Finals series average: MJ 41.0
- Most Total Points Career: Kareem 38387
- Most Total Points Season: Wilt 4029
- Most Total Points Playoffs: MJ 5987
- Most Total Points Finals: West 1679
- Most seasons leading league in scoring: MJ 10
- Most seasons leading league in total points: MJ 11
- Most consecutive seasons leading in scoring: MJ, Wilt tied at 7
- Most 60 point games: Wilt 32
- Most 50 point games: Wilt 118
- Most 50 point games playoffs: MJ 8
- Most 40 point games: Wilt 271
- Most 40 point games playoffs: MJ 38
- Most 30 point games: MJ 563
- Most consecutive 60 point games: Wilt 4
- Most consecutive 50 point games: Wilt 7
- Most consecutive 50 point games playoffs: MJ 2
- Most consecutive 45 point games: Wilt 7
- Most consecutive 45 point games playoffs: MJ 3
- Most consecutive 40 point games: Wilt 14
- Most consecutive 40 point games rookie: AI 5
- Most consecutive 40 point games playoffs: West 6
- Most consecutive 40 point games finals: MJ 4
- Most consecutive 35 point games: Wilt 33
- Most consecutive 30 point games: Wilt 65
- Most consecutive 30 point games playoffs: Elgin 11
- Most consecutive 30 point games finals: MJ 9
- Most consecutive 20 point games: Wilt 126
- Most consecutive 20 point games playoffs: MJ 60
- Most consecutive 20 point games finals: MJ 35
- Most consecutive double figures scoring: MJ 866
- Most consecutive points in one game: Manu 24
- Most consecutive points in one game playoffs: LBJ 25
- Highest scoring game: Wilt 100
- Highest scoring game playoffs: MJ 63
- Highest scoring game finals: Elgin 61
- Highest scoring game rookie: Wilt 58
- Highest scoring all-star game: Wilt 42
- Highest scoring all-rookie game: KB 31
- Most points in 3 quarters: Wilt 69
- Most points in one half: Wilt 59
- Most points one half playoffs: Sleepy Floyd 39
- Most points in one half finals: MJ 35
- Most points one half all-star game: Rice 24
- Most points in one quarter: Gervin 33
- Most points in one quarter playoffs: Sleepy Floyd 29
- Most points in one quarter finals: Isiah 25
- Most points in one quarter all-star game: Rice 20
- Most points in OT: Arenas 16
- Most points in OT playoffs: Drexler 13
- Most points in OT in finals: Havlicek, Laimbeer,
Ainge tied at 9
- Oldest to score 50: MJ 51 at age 38
- Oldest to score 40: MJ 43 at age 40

That was just scoring, now on to the rest.

You talk about what Wilt did in the regular season, which is fine and all, but when talking about the best, what they did in the playoffs and finals is what matters. Wilt getting 55 rebounds against Russell in a meaningless regular season game doesn't matter much does it? Especially when in the finals he averages 11.7 ppg against him one year.

Wilt lost 5 series with Homecourt Advantage, 5 of them. Did the poster know that?

Here were the years.

Wilt Chamberlain (lost in
Image
"Talent wins games, but teamwork and intelligence wins championships."
- Michael Jordan
sp6r=underrated
RealGM
Posts: 20,892
And1: 13,688
Joined: Jan 20, 2007
 

 

Post#22 » by sp6r=underrated » Fri Apr 4, 2008 4:14 pm

LOL, at this thread becoming Wilt v MJ
JordansBulls
RealGM
Posts: 60,467
And1: 5,348
Joined: Jul 12, 2006
Location: HCA (Homecourt Advantage)

 

Post#23 » by JordansBulls » Fri Apr 4, 2008 4:42 pm

sp6r=underrated wrote:LOL, at this thread becoming Wilt v MJ


Tell me about it. You see the question that I asked? Very next post went totally off topic.
Image
"Talent wins games, but teamwork and intelligence wins championships."
- Michael Jordan
writerman
Banned User
Posts: 6,836
And1: 5
Joined: Sep 02, 2002

The Answer 

Post#24 » by writerman » Fri Apr 4, 2008 6:58 pm

JordansBulls wrote:-= original quote snipped =-



Tell me about it. You see the question that I asked? Very next post went totally off topic.


Russell was a great defender--however it wasn't he that "handled" Wilt. Almost invariably when Wilt had low scoring games against the Celtics, it was because they succeeded as a team in smothering his teammates and keeping them from getting Wilt the ball. They were insanely good at that, and not just against Wilt.

And yes, I'll say it--Jordan never faced anything remotely like the the perfect defensive juggernaut the Celtics, and the Russell Celtics in particular, were. Jordan played in a watered-down league when the great teams of the '80s were already finished, never won anything without an above-average group of teammates for support, and never saw a shot he didn't like, even late in his career with the Wizards when it was clear his offensive selfishness was hurting the team. It says volumes that for his career, Wilt, a center, averaged only slightly fewer apg in an era when assists weren't easily credited, than swingman Jordan did.
JordansBulls
RealGM
Posts: 60,467
And1: 5,348
Joined: Jul 12, 2006
Location: HCA (Homecourt Advantage)

Re: The Answer 

Post#25 » by JordansBulls » Fri Apr 4, 2008 7:12 pm

writerman wrote:-= original quote snipped =-



Russell was a great defender--however it wasn't he that "handled" Wilt. Almost invariably when Wilt had low scoring games against the Celtics, it was because they succeeded as a team in smothering his teammates and keeping them from getting Wilt the ball. They were insanely good at that, and not just against Wilt.

And yes, I'll say it--Jordan never faced anything remotely like the the perfect defensive juggernaut the Celtics, and the Russell Celtics in particular, were. Jordan played in a watered-down league when the great teams of the '80s were already finished, never won anything without an above-average group of teammates for support, and never saw a shot he didn't like, even late in his career with the Wizards when it was clear his offensive selfishness was hurting the team. It says volumes that for his career, Wilt, a center, averaged only slightly fewer apg in an era when assists weren't easily credited, than swingman Jordan did.


And I'll say it again that Wilt lost 5x with Homecourt Advantage. What that means is that you are supposed to win. Especially considering he was heavily favored a few of those years. 1968 his team won 62 games to Russell's 54 and had a 3-1 lead and lost with game at home. 1969 Wilt's team was heavily favored and up 3-2 and still lost including game 7 at home.
Also Wilt couldn't win as a dominant scorer like Jordan. In fact, Jordan was the only player to ever win multiple titles while winning scoring titles.
Wilt had to change his game just to win.

As far as what Wilt did, well it speaks volumes that a guy who averaged 30 ppg in the season dropped 7 ppg in the playoffs when it mattered and never once averaged 30 ppg in the finals.
No way possible is a guy whose production decreases that much in the playoffs and finals worthy of being called the best that has played.
I'm not saying that everything is going to increase, but in the postseason your numbers should at least be around what you did in the regular season not dropped that much especially in points.

Also Wilt lost in 1961 to the Syracuse Nationals who were 38-41 while his team was 46-33. Wilt's team lost to them despite the Nationals being below .500 and he got swept 3-0.
Image
"Talent wins games, but teamwork and intelligence wins championships."
- Michael Jordan

Return to Player Comparisons