Darrell Arthur?

Draft talk all year round

Moderators: Duke4life831, Marcus

User avatar
Cruel_Ruin
Head Coach
Posts: 6,091
And1: 767
Joined: Nov 05, 2006
Location: The intersection of intellect, imagination and insanity
   

Darrell Arthur? 

Post#1 » by Cruel_Ruin » Fri Apr 4, 2008 7:03 pm

He seems to be tanking on numerous draft boards. I know he didn't have his best performances of late, but being frozen out by Kansas' guards certainly didn't help. What's the opinion about him?
Jonathan Watters
Banned User
Posts: 1,159
And1: 3
Joined: Jan 07, 2005

 

Post#2 » by Jonathan Watters » Fri Apr 4, 2008 7:11 pm

I didn't think he hurt himself against Davidson, it was Jackson making the mental mistakes on defense...
User avatar
AI2TY5
Freshman
Posts: 61
And1: 1
Joined: Jul 21, 2007

 

Post#3 » by AI2TY5 » Fri Apr 4, 2008 8:46 pm

he was expected to do a lot more this year especially with julian wright gone. he doesn't board as much as he should given his athleticism and disappears at times. that said i hope he falls to the sixers at 16. i think he actually could blossom in the nba in a more pick and roll type of offense.
User avatar
Cammo101
Mr. Mock Draft
Posts: 30,929
And1: 2,034
Joined: Feb 11, 2006
Location: Austin, TX
     

 

Post#4 » by Cammo101 » Fri Apr 4, 2008 10:11 pm

I still love the guy. He is being hurt because he plays on a balanced team and does not force shots. On a lesser team, Arthur is a 22 and 10 guy. I hope he returns for another year to show what he can do as the go to guy. If he comes out, he is a top 15 pick.
User avatar
Cruel_Ruin
Head Coach
Posts: 6,091
And1: 767
Joined: Nov 05, 2006
Location: The intersection of intellect, imagination and insanity
   

 

Post#5 » by Cruel_Ruin » Sat Apr 5, 2008 12:51 am

Cammo101 wrote:I still love the guy. He is being hurt because he plays on a balanced team and does not force shots. On a lesser team, Arthur is a 22 and 10 guy. I hope he returns for another year to show what he can do as the go to guy. If he comes out, he is a top 15 pick.


You think he is a good rebounder? He seems pretty poor in that area.
User avatar
RyGuy24
General Manager
Posts: 8,016
And1: 107
Joined: Mar 12, 2004
Location: 48 minutes of Intensity

 

Post#6 » by RyGuy24 » Sat Apr 5, 2008 1:37 am

He reminds me of a Joe Smith type of player (not the prime Joe where he put up good numbers, a litte later in the career). Solid rotation player that any team would love, but I don't know how high you take a guy like that. He's still in my top 15 for sure, though.
Image
R.I.P Red , Norm, Bullsmaniac, and pdenninggolden.
riehldeal
Banned User
Posts: 1,315
And1: 7
Joined: Jul 16, 2002

 

Post#7 » by riehldeal » Sat Apr 5, 2008 9:13 pm

Don't underestimate the type of ceiling this kid has......dude just turned 20 or will soon
Jonathan Watters
Banned User
Posts: 1,159
And1: 3
Joined: Jan 07, 2005

 

Post#8 » by Jonathan Watters » Sat Apr 5, 2008 9:46 pm

riehldeal wrote:Don't underestimate the type of ceiling this kid has......dude just turned 20 or will soon


No doubt about it.

I don't have the vivid memories of Smith at Maryland that I do of Glenn Robinson or Chris Webber (I grew up in Big Ten territory), but I can tell you that Arthur has much more of an upside than the blue-collar roleplayer Joe Smith has become. Not that he's as likely to evolve into a blue-collar roleplayer, but he certainly has some athletic gifts/skill that Smith rarely if ever utilized.
A.J.
Banned User
Posts: 12,072
And1: 1
Joined: Jul 25, 2007
Location: Houston(University of Houston in 2009)

 

Post#9 » by A.J. » Sat Apr 5, 2008 9:48 pm

I really like him. Very athletic power forward, who has potential
User avatar
UrbanLegendMD
General Manager
Posts: 8,716
And1: 11
Joined: Jul 30, 2004
Location: Pilsen

 

Post#10 » by UrbanLegendMD » Sun Apr 6, 2008 12:01 am

I think he's better than Julian Wright and he went in the lottery IIRC.
First the federal government borrowed money; then gave the money to Bank of America; then I borrowed some of that money from Bank of America and gave it to the federal government; then the federal government gave the money back to Bank of America.
Ballings7
RealGM
Posts: 24,496
And1: 2,217
Joined: Jan 04, 2006

 

Post#11 » by Ballings7 » Sun Apr 6, 2008 5:07 am

Agreed with Cammo. I think he can really be a a good player in the NBA.
The Playoffs don't care about your Analytics
DanTown8587
RealGM
Posts: 37,583
And1: 9,333
Joined: Jan 06, 2008
Location: Chicago
     

 

Post#12 » by DanTown8587 » Sun Apr 6, 2008 1:38 pm

Arthur has a huge potential money making game on the line Monday, but lets say he gives about what he has this year (12 and 6) and plays decent defense on the Double D's of Memphis, he will go teens. That stretches as high as 10 or 11, but I don't see how teams like Philly, Cleveland or Phoenix all pass on him.
...
User avatar
DFolks
Veteran
Posts: 2,933
And1: 208
Joined: Apr 25, 2007
Location: CHICAGO, illinois

 

Post#13 » by DFolks » Sun Apr 6, 2008 1:40 pm

NurbekIL wrote:I think he's better than Julian Wright and he went in the lottery IIRC.


your from Illinois as well, shame on you
DanTown8587
RealGM
Posts: 37,583
And1: 9,333
Joined: Jan 06, 2008
Location: Chicago
     

 

Post#14 » by DanTown8587 » Sun Apr 6, 2008 1:40 pm

Plus, watching that game against UNC, I really noticed (as did everyone) how poor Kansas is at decision making and how quickly they will abandon the post game, so its safe to say that if they were committed year round, every game, to getting Arthur touches than he would put up better numbers. I like his game more than Love because they are about even in terms of what you get right now and then in five years Arthur could be a potential top PF in your conference and I don't see Love as more than serviceable starter.
...
corwin
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,103
And1: 13
Joined: Jul 19, 2006

 

Post#15 » by corwin » Sun Apr 6, 2008 3:04 pm

DanTown8587 wrote:Arthur has a huge potential money making game on the line Monday, but lets say he gives about what he has this year (12 and 6) and plays decent defense on the Double D's of Memphis, he will go teens. That stretches as high as 10 or 11, but I don't see how teams like Philly, Cleveland or Phoenix all pass on him.

You're right about the Sixers. As a fan, he's on our short list with Ibaka, Jason Thompson, Robin Lopez, Thabeet, & D Green. He could easily be there at 16/17.
UGA Hayes
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 32,351
And1: 21,082
Joined: Jan 05, 2004
Location: real gm

 

Post#16 » by UGA Hayes » Sun Apr 6, 2008 3:24 pm

Still not impressed with Arthur. Hansbourough played terrible defense yesterday. Looks to me like a turnaround jumpshooter on the NBA level.
Ruzious
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 47,909
And1: 11,582
Joined: Jul 17, 2001
       

 

Post#17 » by Ruzious » Sun Apr 6, 2008 3:30 pm

Jonathan Watters wrote:-= original quote snipped =-



No doubt about it.

I don't have the vivid memories of Smith at Maryland that I do of Glenn Robinson or Chris Webber (I grew up in Big Ten territory), but I can tell you that Arthur has much more of an upside than the blue-collar roleplayer Joe Smith has become. Not that he's as likely to evolve into a blue-collar roleplayer, but he certainly has some athletic gifts/skill that Smith rarely if ever utilized.

Terp fan here - Joe Smith was limited by his very thin frame - not his athleticism. Arthur has a bigger frame to add size than Smith had at the same age - Joe was 210 as a junior. But he's still got to add a good 20 lbs of muscle to become a primetime NBA PF. I think he has the frame to do it - without losing athleticism. He should work on that turnaround jumpshot he flashed once last night. It could be a signature move for him - ala Elvin Hayes.
USballer33
Ballboy
Posts: 39
And1: 2
Joined: Jan 24, 2007

 

Post#18 » by USballer33 » Sun Apr 6, 2008 3:56 pm

I think Arthur would be perfect for the Kings at 12. He is the athletic big man needed next to Hawes for the future.
jumanji
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,678
And1: 4
Joined: Mar 24, 2004

 

Post#19 » by jumanji » Sun Apr 6, 2008 4:23 pm

DanTown8587 wrote:Plus, watching that game against UNC, I really noticed (as did everyone) how poor Kansas is at decision making and how quickly they will abandon the post game, so its safe to say that if they were committed year round, every game, to getting Arthur touches than he would put up better numbers. I like his game more than Love because they are about even in terms of what you get right now and then in five years Arthur could be a potential top PF in your conference and I don't see Love as more than serviceable starter.


Not sure where either player will be in 5 years but you think Arthur is better than Love right now?, that is pretty bazaar to me.
User avatar
UrbanLegendMD
General Manager
Posts: 8,716
And1: 11
Joined: Jul 30, 2004
Location: Pilsen

 

Post#20 » by UrbanLegendMD » Sun Apr 6, 2008 4:39 pm

DFolks wrote:-= original quote snipped =-



your from Illinois as well, shame on you


Hey, when he signed with Kansas, **** him.
First the federal government borrowed money; then gave the money to Bank of America; then I borrowed some of that money from Bank of America and gave it to the federal government; then the federal government gave the money back to Bank of America.

Return to NBA Draft