Who would have gotten the better deal?

[DH34Phan]

Bucks trade: Bobby Simmons and Dan Gadzuric

for

Knicks trade: Zach Randolph

This deal was close to happening at the trade deadline.

[spacemonkey]

Knicks...

[warren weel im]

No way the Bucks think they got the better. While ZBo is indeed a headcase, he gives you 16-10 night in and out.

[pdub15]

Bucks. Zach though prone to headcase issues gets u 16 and 10. That gives the Bucks an inside prensence which would help because Charlie V, Bogot, and Yi aren't that. They are bigs that face up and shoot jumpers. Michael Redd and Zach would be a nice 1-2 punch with Mo, Charlie, Bogot, & Yi being nice pieces around them. In the East you would definately compete.

[trwi7]

Bucks. Zach though prone to headcase issues gets u 16 and 10. That gives the Bucks an inside prensence which would help because Charlie V, Bogot, and Yi aren't that. They are bigs that face up and shoot jumpers. Michael Redd and Zach would be a nice 1-2 punch with Mo, Charlie, Bogot, & Yi being nice pieces around them. In the East you would definately compete.

I'm just curious. Have you ever seen "Bogot" play? Because your description of him is not anything close to accurate.

Anyways the Bucks win this deal hands down. I was one of the biggest advocates of this trade on the Bucks board with everybody else saying no because of his character issues and taking away the development of Yi and Bogut. I was of the opinion that if you can get rid of two overpaid bums like Gadzuric and Simmons and pick up a productive player you do it.

[DanTown8587]

Clearly the Bucks win, they trade two awful contracts of players who should not get regular minutes for a starter. Plus, how much worse does it get in Milwaukee if they make this deal?