I haven't read the other pages in this thread so I might be repeating a few things.
In simple terms, the Cavs are built quite well to achieve what they need to. Enough veterans that can play some defense and compliment Lebron. It's probably the best way to surround him except it would be better if there was one other solid complimentary player, the way Kobe now has Gasol. That would elevate them yet again, but what they're doing is working, and that's the bottom line.
The Warriors are one of those streaky teams that when they're on they're scary. They can light it up against anyone when they are on a roll. But there's so much inconsistencies that unless they get hot they don't have the ability to fall back and rely on their defense to keep them in games. It might have been a bit different if Biedrens was healthy all season.
Warriors and Cavaliers overrated? Hmm
Moderators: bwgood77, zimpy27, infinite11285, Clav, Domejandro, ken6199, bisme37, Dirk, KingDavid, cupcakesnake
-
- Lead Assistant
- Posts: 5,718
- And1: 45
- Joined: May 05, 2007
-
- Analyst
- Posts: 3,314
- And1: 3
- Joined: Jul 04, 2007
Gordon Bombay wrote:overrated implies that we were supposed to be something good, when clearly we werent. a better phrase would be to say that we suck horribly not that we are overrated
heres what espn.com thought about the cavs in the preseason
http://sports.espn.go.com/nba/dailydime?page=dime-ClevelandPreview0708
seems like we are right where they predicted us at
heres a gm survey on nba.com
http://www.nba.com/preview2007/gmsurvey_predictions.html
clearly the bulls and the heat should be considered more overrated than the cavs because the cavs are right where everyone thought theyd be
Orlando was massively under rated.
12th in the east ROFL
Illuminati wrote:MagicNoles is a g. Don't bring beef and there ain't no beef.