Shocking Draft Measurements

Moderators: Clyde Frazier, Doctor MJ, trex_8063, penbeast0, PaulieWal

User avatar
Joseph17
RealGM
Posts: 10,430
And1: 529
Joined: Jul 09, 2004
Location: New York
   

Re: Shocking Draft Measurements 

Post#21 » by Joseph17 » Wed Apr 9, 2008 6:15 pm

og15 wrote:-= original quote snipped =-


Without the ball, straight down the court sprint, why not? Let's add dribbling and changing directions to that, and it's a whole different story :wink:

Paul and Ellis seem a lot faster without the ball as well.
User avatar
tracey_nice
Analyst
Posts: 3,531
And1: 274
Joined: Jan 08, 2008
Location: PAUUSE

 

Post#22 » by tracey_nice » Thu Apr 10, 2008 3:30 am

Schadenfreude wrote:-= original quote snipped =-



Unfortunately, wingspan does not equate to IQ...Humphries is about two standard deviations away from being an exceptional player.

lol :clap:
og15
Forum Mod - Clippers
Forum Mod - Clippers
Posts: 50,840
And1: 33,650
Joined: Jun 23, 2004
Location: NBA Fan
 

Re: Shocking Draft Measurements 

Post#23 » by og15 » Thu Apr 10, 2008 4:57 am

joeyyowee wrote:-= original quote snipped =-


Paul and Ellis seem a lot faster without the ball as well.

Depends how you run. Some people look slow when running but they cover a lot of ground. I haven't really analyzed how these guys run, but in just a foot race, it's very possible for Lee and Williams to beat Paul and Monta. It wouldn't neccesarily look like that on the basketball court though.
User avatar
noido
Bench Warmer
Posts: 1,436
And1: 22
Joined: Jun 19, 2004

 

Post#24 » by noido » Thu Apr 10, 2008 10:46 am

NO-KG-AI wrote:-= original quote snipped =-



Not if you are 6'10, with a tiny chest, yet still boasting a 7'5 wingspan.


I think if you train for it, it should not be hard no matter your body type. Bodyweight is not particularly difficult if you train seriously and for most of these guys it is well less than bw.

Also the form required in combines is not particularly strict and these guys do want to be professional athletes.
User avatar
kooldude
Lead Assistant
Posts: 4,823
And1: 78
Joined: Jul 08, 2007

 

Post#25 » by kooldude » Thu Apr 10, 2008 11:11 am

NO-KG-AI wrote:-= original quote snipped =-



6'10 wingspan, 8'11.5 standing reach......


I meant the part about Smush Parker having almost the same standing reach.
Warspite wrote:I still would take Mitch (Richmond) over just about any SG playing today. His peak is better than 2011 Kobe and with 90s rules hes better than Wade.


Jordan23Forever wrote:People are delusional.
_BBIB_
Lead Assistant
Posts: 4,622
And1: 16
Joined: May 23, 2007

 

Post#26 » by _BBIB_ » Thu Apr 10, 2008 11:02 pm

Marvin Williams tested out pretty impressive on paper which is why I have and still am holding on to high hopes for the kid.

But man he doesn't look like he's nearly as fast as his 3/4 court sprint
Myth_Breaker
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,122
And1: 77
Joined: Jun 26, 2006
Location: Otwock, Poland
   

 

Post#27 » by Myth_Breaker » Thu Apr 10, 2008 11:04 pm

_BBIB_ wrote:Marvin Williams tested out pretty impressive on paper which is why I have and still am holding on to high hopes for the kid.

But man he doesn't look like he's nearly as fast as his 3/4 court sprint


Farmar was very quick during the tests as well, while didn't quite prove it on the court, despite being better in this regard recently.
http://wiltfan.tripod.com
Read: Edward Lucas "The New Cold War: Putin's Russia and the Threat to the West".
"So what, son, did your Poles help you?" YES, WE DID!
***** *** Kukiza i KonfederacjÄ™!

Return to Player Comparisons


cron