Jordan23Forever wrote:-= original quote snipped =-
Why are you talking about Chicago when the discussion is about Paul and Kobe?
You know, play dumb if you want to.......
Moderators: Clyde Frazier, Doctor MJ, trex_8063, penbeast0, PaulieWal
writerman wrote:absolutely not. And that's in spite of the fact that there's probably no one on this board who hates Kobe's guts as much as I do.
This worship of this wet-behind-the-ears kid Paul has soared lightyears beyond the absurd here.
RobertGlory wrote:-= original quote snipped =-
we wouldn't be hyping him if he wasn't producing
what was kobe doing at 22 or his third year?????
fanofthegreats wrote:-= original quote snipped =-
^
Putting up 28-6-6 and 1st-team All-D while dominating in the playoffs en route to helping Lakers to their 2nd title?
Duiz wrote:-= original quote snipped =-
you mean 22-6-5?
EHL wrote:-= original quote snipped =-
No, he means exactly what he said. Look it up; http://www.basketball-reference.com/pla ... nko01.html
richboy wrote:
I could never say that about KG. Even though he is a great player. In some way even in his prime he is Joakim Noah with a jump shot and a little better post game. Outside of that they have the exact same skill set.
writerman wrote:absolutely not. And that's in spite of the fact that there's probably no one on this board who hates Kobe's guts as much as I do.
This worship of this wet-behind-the-ears kid Paul has soared lightyears beyond the absurd here.
Doctor MJ wrote:I don't understand why people jump in a thread and say basically, "This thing you're all talking about. I'm too ignorant to know anything about it. Lollerskates!"
saying Kobe was just the "other" significant contributing factor is a being a bit harsh on Kobe...HarlemHeat37 wrote:Kobe is a top 15 player of all-time, but we can people PLEASE state that he did it as a #2 option when the championships are mentioned..there's a significant difference between being the best player on the team and being "the other" major contributing factor on a team..