Redd, Mo and Gadz for Starbury and Malik Rose?

[NotYoAvgNBAFan]

by taking on the expiring contracts of starberry and rose, and essentually just giving away redd and M o for nothing but expiring contracts, that would appear to me that those in favor of this trade would also be in favor of tanking another season away. it seems odd you want to give away our best players for expiring contracts, but you always seem against tanking. any deal involving starberry for redd would have to include unprotetcted lottery draft picks.

wouldn't keeping Larry K as coach accomplish the same thing?

You dont have to get rid of Redd but you can get it done with Simmons, Gadzuric and Williams for sure.

Just do it!

[MajorDad]

I first thought trading simmons for Starbury might be a good idea. But the problem with Starberry is he would actually want to play. his selfish me first attitude is not one I'd want as a mentor to a young point guard. If the Bucks actually traded for starberry, I'd want them to waive him jus t like portland waived francis.

At this stage in his career he has become a very bitter person; a coach killer, and a one man team. There is no starberry in the word TEAM. .

[jerrod]

you don't want to waive him, you want to keep him away from the team but on the roster so you can trade him as an expiring next year

[wichmae]

he expires at that seasons end not the following.

Once he is eligible to be traded again in the offseason that following offseason is when he comes off the books...

[Rockmaninoff]

I said this a thousdand times and you are repeating it here instead of giving me credit for having said it.

You all do that to me all the time that bugs the hell out of me...at times.

You don't have to explain it to me bro, I know exactly how you feel. I've been preaching exit stage left for Mo and CV since I saw that pre-season game up in Minneapolis. I've been talking about how a precisely structured offense is the key to an excellent defense. I've been saying that Krystkowiak would fail due to his inability to overcome politics since he was hired. I said that Philadelphia was a solid team since last season, and that all they needed was a starting power forward (CV), and now I'm reading their very own fans echo that sentiment. I've been saying defense at the point and at the 3, and a scoring big 3 of Redd, Yi, and Bogut, since the beginning of time. Then you have a 6th man that can sub for 2 positions and kill the other teams bench, and the other three members of the rotation off the bench should provide complimentary, non-redundant skills and body types. I've been pontificating addition by subtraction since the jump. Identify your scorers, compliment them, set it up in a structure, and go win some damn games! But, I digress...

I would do Williams, Villanueva, Gadzuric, and 2007 1st round draft pick

for

Marbury, Robinson, Balkman, Lee, and 2008 and 2010 2nd round pick

I would enjoy a rotation of...

Sessions/Robinson
Redd/Bell
Balkman/Simmons
Yi/Lee
Bogut/Lee

...it pleases my rebounding and defense aesthetics, while also satisfying my Redd, Yi, and Bogut percision offense with Sessions at the helm. If it sucks, then at least we got rid of some bad contracts. I emailed this to Harris in December. He was too attached to Mo.