This thread isn't to denigrate Thornton; he has played well this season, and the praise for his game is certainly deserved. However, I do wonder whether those suggesting him as a future star are missing one variable: his age.
Thornton is a beast, but at age 24, shouldn't he be much more impressive than his 18-21 year old counterparts? 12.7/4.5 on a TS% of .505 is solid as a rookie, but loses some of its lustre when one considers that he is older than six All-Stars this year (and four-fifths of the Eastern Conference starting line-up).
I ask because it is very difficult to find an easy comparison; there are virtually no players who have come through the college ranks, made their debuts so late, and went on the stardom. Only Dikembe Mutombo and David Robinson fit the bill, and both entered the league fully formed. Of course, the reverse is true; no college player save those two has entered and made such an immediate impact, nor showed the same kind of potential. Looking over the numbers, Brent Barry (another Clipper, coincidentally) is the closest comparator in terms of rookie success for a 24 year old.
So...is Al Thornton a late-bloomer who should be judged as an outstanding rookie and likely star, or just a physically mature 24 year old who is more likely to plateau than ascend?
Al Thornton: Future star, or 'veteran rookie'?
Moderators: Clyde Frazier, Doctor MJ, trex_8063, penbeast0, PaulieWal
Al Thornton: Future star, or 'veteran rookie'?
- Schad
- Retired Mod
- Posts: 58,529
- And1: 18,041
- Joined: Feb 08, 2006
- Location: The Goat Rodeo
-
Al Thornton: Future star, or 'veteran rookie'?

**** your asterisk.
- dockingsched
- Retired Mod
- Posts: 56,660
- And1: 23,966
- Joined: Aug 02, 2005
-
i don't think he's destined for stardom, i do however think his game will improve more than a player his age would be expected. having seen him play all season, his game reminds u of someone who only played one yr in college. he's all athleticism, with very raw skills. you'd think his game would be more refined but its not.
"We must try not to sink beneath our anguish, Harry, but battle on." - Dumbledore
- Texas Longhorns
- Banned User
- Posts: 4,005
- And1: 3
- Joined: Jan 08, 2008
- Location: Cockrell School of Engineering
- Contact:
- NO-KG-AI
- Retired Mod
- Posts: 44,088
- And1: 20,040
- Joined: Jul 19, 2005
- Location: The city of witch doctors, and good ol' pickpockets
dcash4 wrote:i don't think he's destined for stardom, i do however think his game will improve more than a player his age would be expected. having seen him play all season, his game reminds u of someone who only played one yr in college. he's all athleticism, with very raw skills. you'd think his game would be more refined but its not.
Beautiful, well put, QFT, agreed, etc.
Doctor MJ wrote:I don't understand why people jump in a thread and say basically, "This thing you're all talking about. I'm too ignorant to know anything about it. Lollerskates!"
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 21,602
- And1: 30
- Joined: Oct 10, 2006
- Location: why you take out my sig for?
-
- Forum Mod - Raptors
- Posts: 92,223
- And1: 31,807
- Joined: Oct 14, 2003
-
I dunno, I don't think the age is all that important. He's a rookie, so you expect certain elements of a rookie season to affect most rookies the same way. He's got the physical traits necessary for success, now he just has to let coaching and hard work build his skills up to match his athleticism. I think he'll be fine, I think he can definitely be like Corey Maggette (only smarter) and a repeat All-Star.
Will it happen? *shrugs*
But I don't think his late start precludes him from being an All-Star two or three times.
Will it happen? *shrugs*
But I don't think his late start precludes him from being an All-Star two or three times.