Yeah! Last win last game=HCA Over Jazz

Christine-In-AZ · Post #1 » by **Christine-In-AZ** » Thu Apr 17, 2008 5:11 am

I have my doubts about getting to the WCF, but if we get there along with the Jazz, we now will have the home court advantage thanks to beating the Blazers.

Yeah!

impulsenine · Post #2 » by **impulsenine** » Thu Apr 17, 2008 5:19 am

IBTL.

Also... you posted this idea like seventeen times in the Blazer game thread, even after the Jazz lost.

Wassamattawityou?

Seattlesun · Post #3 » by **Seattlesun** » Thu Apr 17, 2008 5:19 am

is it possible to post anything more premature?

Christine-In-AZ · Post #4 » by **Christine-In-AZ** » Thu Apr 17, 2008 5:32 am

just trying to put some meaning into tonite's win

something FSN couldn't do

FU

Christine-In-AZ · Post #5 » by **Christine-In-AZ** » Thu Apr 17, 2008 5:33 am

impulsenine wrote:IBTL.

Also... you posted this idea like seventeen times in the Blazer game thread, even after the Jazz lost.

Wassamattawityou?

"even after the Jazz lost"

If they hadn't lost it wouldn't make sense numb nuts!

Why the abuse? If the win tonite represented home court adv with the Lakers in the WCF ...wouldn't that be of note? Something to mention.

I don't get this forum ...I'll keep trying

impulsenine · Post #6 » by **impulsenine** » Thu Apr 17, 2008 5:41 am

But .. the Jazz did lose. Before our game was halfway over. That's why Marks had a chance to show off his AWESOME shot and moves.

Aaaaand DJ got a chance to show how bad he needs to work on his shot.

I mean, I imagine that the announcers would've pointed out the importance of the game if it were, you know, important.

Christine-In-AZ · Post #7 » by **Christine-In-AZ** » Thu Apr 17, 2008 5:50 am

impulsenine wrote:But .. the Jazz did lose. Before our game was halfway over. That's why Marks had a chance to show off his AWESOME shot and moves.

Aaaaand DJ got a chance to show how bad he needs to work on his shot.

I mean, I imagine that the announcers would've pointed out the importance of the game if it were, you know, important.

It was important (apparently not to you) to win ...gave us HCA over Utah if we play in the WCF!

I'm glad Shaq and Nash didn't play, but someone at FSN should've spoke about this important FACT.

Christine-In-AZ · Post #8 » by **Christine-In-AZ** » Thu Apr 17, 2008 5:52 am

impulsenine wrote:But .. the Jazz did lose. Before our game was halfway over. That's why Marks had a chance to show off his AWESOME shot and moves.

Aaaaand DJ got a chance to show how bad he needs to work on his shot.

I mean, I imagine that the announcers would've pointed out the importance of the game if it were, you know, important.

Not at all meaning to be mean, but can't you do the math?

impulsenine · Post #9 » by **impulsenine** » Thu Apr 17, 2008 5:57 am

Ugh... OK I have been working too much. For some reason I was thinking you thought we'd *play* the Jazz. As in, during the first round.

Let it not be said I can't say when I misread something.

Ironically I predicted we'll play them, too. And homecourt would be nice vs. the Jazz.

impulsenine · Post #10 » by **impulsenine** » Thu Apr 17, 2008 5:58 am

Although, don't call people numbnuts. It's not polite and decreases the chances they'll read your posts carefully by an order of magnitude.

Post #11 » by **TASTIC** » Thu Apr 17, 2008 9:07 am

Nice point Chris, optimism is always welcome...

Frank Lee · Post #12 » by **Frank Lee** » Fri Apr 18, 2008 10:36 am

TASTIC wrote:Nice point Chris, optimism is always welcome...

I believe Socrates said it best......... 'Everything in Moderation'